Being conscious of this fact is an essential first step in avoiding the too-often egregious bias of Western scholarship on all things \u201coriental.\u201d <\/strong><\/p>\nI mentioned two foundations that serve the philosopher\/ethicist in understanding Buddhist ethics, vis. anthropology and philology.<\/p>\n
~<\/p>\n
Only with these two foundations largely in place has the sub-discipline of Buddhist ethics been able to emerge in a meaningful way. And this emergence is a very recent event in Western academic history. So recent, in fact, that it is difficult to pinpoint even the decade of its origins. In this talk I shall survey some of the history of studies in Buddhist ethics. While that history extends well over 100 years, the massive expansion of work in Buddhist ethics in just the last 35 years will dominate my discussion this evening. I shall conclude by discussing some contemporary work and debates in Buddhist ethics and suggest where the field will hopefully go in the coming years.<\/p>\n
1970s<\/h2>\n
In 1979 Frank Reynolds published \u2018Buddhist Ethics: A Bibliographical Essay\u2019 in the Religious Studies Review<\/em>. His review begins, \u2018Unfortunately, modern scholars have devoted relatively little attention to the study of Buddhist ethics. The works on the topic are neither extensive nor, for the most part, impressive\u2019 (p.40). Remarking on Reynolds\u2019 bibliographic essay, Charles Prebish notes that, \u2018It is \u2026 revealing that over one hundred years of publications on Buddhist ethics could be condensed into eight journal pages despite Reynolds\u2019 exhaustive and comprehensive search\u2019 (1996, p.297). However, an early expansion of thought on Buddhist ethics did occur just as Reynolds\u2019 article was going to press.<\/p>\nThese early works coincided with the publication of two influential books on Comparative Religious Ethics. The first, simply titled Comparative Religious Ethics<\/em> (1978) by David Little and Sumner B. Twiss, proposed a tripartite system for classifying religious ethics. This system, they proposed, could serve as a \u2018descriptive universal\u2019 (pp. 119 and 225), applicable to all religious systems in the service of understanding and comparing their distinctive features. The system, in brief, created a hierarchy, beginning at the most basic level of an agent\u2019s situational application of basic norms. The second level of analysis comes at the validation of those norms; which for Little and Twiss would either be in the form of natural laws or duties (deontological) or ultimate goals (teleological). Finally, they suggested a category of vindication, looking at metaethical concepts and discussions, or the reasons given for accepting or rejecting certain validations. This tripartite theory is just one of many that have been proposed for better understanding religious, and specifically Buddhist, ethics.<\/p>\nIn 1978, the year that Little and Twiss\u2019 book came out, a panel on Therav\u0101din Buddhist ethics was convened at the annual American Academy of Religion meeting. The next year, papers from that panel were published in a special \u2018Focus on Therav\u0101da Buddhist Ethics\u2019 in the Journal of Religious Ethics. Four papers were given, each suggesting unique conceptual frameworks in order to account for the variety of ethical statements being examined. Harvey Aronson began the series by critiquing the kammic-nibbanic framework proposed by Winston King and adopted by Melford Spiro and instead suggested that we view Buddhist ethics through the categories of lokiya<\/em> and lokuttara<\/em>, or worldly and supramundane, activity. Frank Reynolds likewise criticized previous categories, this time going back to the sociologists Max Weber (1946) and Louis Dumont (1970), and suggested a four-fold analysis, again borrowing categories from within Buddhism<\/a>. These are the path-winning monk, the ordinary monk, the bodhisattva king, and the ordinary Buddhist layperson, which he believed \u2018provide a comprehensive yet differentiated overview of the norms which have informed and structured the component elements of traditional Therav\u0101da societies\u2019 (1979, p.20).\u00a0 Joanna Macy and Donald Swearer, the other two authors featured, also dove into the work of discussing and devising conceptual frameworks. In their introduction to the papers, journal editors James Childress and Frank Reynolds suggested that:<\/p>\nThe debate is not whether the conceptual frameworks can and should be used, but their degree of precision and specification, their source, and their illuminative power. [And they warn that:] Hardened conceptual tools may break as much as they dig out, and inappropriate tools may damage the terrain. (Childress and Reynolds 1979, p.4)<\/p>\n
Thus the 1970s promised to give way to work dealing with Buddhist ethics from a variety of conceptual frameworks. All that would be needed was greater philosophical acuity, coupled with ever more data from anthropologists, historians, and philologists. Or so it seemed.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we \u2018bring\u2019 to the study \u2013 even if it is simply in the wording of our questions \u2013 can often shape our research and understanding of the religion. Being conscious of this fact is an essential first […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":118,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n
Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"American Buddhist Perspectives\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/files\/2012\/03\/IMG_1393-11-300x225.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Justin Whitaker\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Justin Whitaker\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html\",\"name\":\"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/abfb8f851f671638c4c7536b963f9da9\"},\"description\":\"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 – the 1970s\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/\",\"name\":\"American Buddhist Perspectives\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/abfb8f851f671638c4c7536b963f9da9\",\"name\":\"Justin Whitaker\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/817b6fba8ae056aaff4f9bdc84347d72?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/817b6fba8ae056aaff4f9bdc84347d72?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Justin Whitaker\"},\"description\":\"I am an almost-life-long Montanan; a baptized Catholic; an ardent Atheist; a practicing Buddhist; a lover of Wisdom. I have a BA and almost an MA in (Western) Philosophy from the University of Montana-Missoula, an MA in Buddhist Studies from Bristol University, UK, and I am currently working on a Ph.D. in Buddhist Ethics at the U of London. My main academic foci are early Buddhist ethics and Kant (odd combination, I know). I also study Western ethics, Tibetan Buddhism, Theravada, Comparative philosophy, and Environmental ethics. I also like photography, running, drinking wine, and eating peanut butter (often in that order).\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/author\/justinwhitaker\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s","description":"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s","og_description":"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html","og_site_name":"American Buddhist Perspectives","article_published_time":"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/files\/2012\/03\/IMG_1393-11-300x225.jpg"}],"author":"Justin Whitaker","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Justin Whitaker","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html","name":"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 - the 1970s","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00","dateModified":"2012-03-25T01:20:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/abfb8f851f671638c4c7536b963f9da9"},"description":"In my last post I opened with the importance of orientation in our studies of Buddhist ethics. What we 'bring' to the study - even if it is simply in the","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/2012\/03\/studies-in-buddhist-ethics-2-the-1970s.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Studies in Buddhist ethics 2 – the 1970s"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/","name":"American Buddhist Perspectives","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/abfb8f851f671638c4c7536b963f9da9","name":"Justin Whitaker","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/817b6fba8ae056aaff4f9bdc84347d72?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/817b6fba8ae056aaff4f9bdc84347d72?s=96&d=identicon&r=pg","caption":"Justin Whitaker"},"description":"I am an almost-life-long Montanan; a baptized Catholic; an ardent Atheist; a practicing Buddhist; a lover of Wisdom. I have a BA and almost an MA in (Western) Philosophy from the University of Montana-Missoula, an MA in Buddhist Studies from Bristol University, UK, and I am currently working on a Ph.D. in Buddhist Ethics at the U of London. My main academic foci are early Buddhist ethics and Kant (odd combination, I know). I also study Western ethics, Tibetan Buddhism, Theravada, Comparative philosophy, and Environmental ethics. I also like photography, running, drinking wine, and eating peanut butter (often in that order).","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/author\/justinwhitaker"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/118"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/americanbuddhist\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/83\/2012\/03\/IMG_1393-11.jpg\" "\\"Sunset")
<\/a>