Nacho wrote, \u201cWhat those basic themes do is really open up a three-pronged crisis (Norman Denzin): 1) A crisis of Representation (we cannot capture direct lived experience. Such experience is constituted textually. This renders the connection between experience and text problematic also). 2) A crisis of Legitimation ( if we have a crisis of representation, how do we legitimate validity, generalizability, etc.), and 3) A crisis of Praxis (how do we act, how do we effect change in society if its nature is essentially marked by textuality).\u201d<\/p>\n
1 \u2013 Wasn\u2019t this covered in Kant\u2019s first critique (Pure Reason)?<\/p>\n
2 \u2013 see comment for 1.<\/p>\n
3 \u2013 Wasn\u2019t this covered in Kant\u2019s second critique (Practical Reason) and the Groundwork for a Metaphysics of Morals<\/span>?<\/p>\n 4 \u2013 the crisis of beauty (I just made that up, so that I could toss in Kant\u2019s third critique \u2013 on aesthetics, or Judgement)<\/p>\n I know I\u2019m being a bit flippant (I just spent 4 months working on Kant and have come to appreciate the guy, that\u2019s all). And now I childishly demand that any philosophy be explained in its relation to Kant. \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogger.googleusercontent.com\/tracker\/7907151-113161768738286505?l=americanbuddhist.blogspot.com\")
<\/div>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"