{"id":2450,"date":"2013-11-22T03:32:17","date_gmt":"2013-11-22T07:32:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?p=2450"},"modified":"2013-11-11T17:10:57","modified_gmt":"2013-11-11T21:10:57","slug":"the-sign-of-jonah","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/","title":{"rendered":"THE SIGN OF JONAH"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but absolute 100% literalism is impossible, because there are at least a few Biblical verses that nobody can accept in pure literal form. The obvious example is Joshua 10.12-13, which assumes that the Sun rotates around the earth. \u201cThe sun stopped in the middle of the sky and delayed going down about a full day.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

As a basis for discussion, though, I offer one example that I have often used in classes. In my opinion, it is a clear example of how a Biblical author used and adapted original materials. I\u2019d like to know what other readers think.<\/p>\n

I have written about reading documents historically<\/a>, in order to find which of multiple versions might be the earlier or more authentic. Whenever I\u2019m teaching about Christian origins or the early Church, I inevitably get into matters of scriptural authority, which is deeply sensitive for many students. There\u2019s one passage in particular \u2013 or rather, one pair of texts \u2013 that I find very useful for illustrating critical approaches to the New Testament in a way that gets students\u2019 attention.<\/p>\n

This is the Sign of Jonah, which features in passages in Mark (12: 39-42) and Luke (11. 29-32). The two texts have such close verbal resemblances that they must have a common origin. Because they are in Matthew and Luke but not Mark, most (but not all) scholars would attribute them to the lost gospel source Q<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Jesus is talking about prophetic signs. He refers to the Queen of the South, who traveled to see Solomon, and also the sign of the prophet Jonah. According to Luke<\/p>\n

For as Jonas was a sign unto the Ninevites, so shall also the Son of man be to this generation.<\/em> \u2026 The men of Nineveh shall rise up in the judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: for they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here <\/em>(KJV)
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

Matthew\u2019s reading is similar, but with a critical difference:<\/p>\n

For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale\u2019s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. The men of Nineveh shall rise in judgment with this generation, and shall condemn it: because they repented at the preaching of Jonas; and, behold, a greater than Jonas is here.<\/em><\/p>\n

In Luke, Jonah is a prophet who calls to repentance. In Matthew, he is relevant because of the direct parallels between his experience and Jesus\u2019s approaching burial and Resurrection. Matthew\u2019s version offers an explicit prophecy of the Resurrection.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Let us assume that these texts come from a common original. I then ask my students which of the two is likely to reflect the original more closely. We really have two options to consider:<\/p>\n

A. Luke\u2019s reading is earlier and closer to Q. In that case, Matthew has subsequently expanded or adapted the original in accordance with doctrines of the emerging Church, and its efforts to find prophetic foretastes of the Christian story.<\/p>\n

B. Matthew\u2019s reading is earlier and closer to Q. The original text included a prophecy of the Resurrection, which Luke has omitted.<\/p>\n

Of the two, it is very difficult to argue against option A, if only because it is so wildly improbable that an author like Luke would have edited out a prophecy \u2013 in Jesus\u2019s own words! \u2013 that would so precisely have served the evangelist\u2019s purposes. On the other hand, it is easy to imagine an author placing such prophecies retroactively into a narrative, as Matthew seems to have done.<\/p>\n

Perhaps the Resurrection element in Matthew\u2019s discourse originated as a midrashic comment or an editorial explanation by the author, which subsequent rewritings transformed into part of a quotation attributed to Jesus. Ancient Greek scribes knew nothing of quotation marks.<\/p>\n

I honestly don\u2019t see any alternative to seeing in these passages an editorial reworking of an earlier source to bring it into accord with the church\u2019s post-Resurrection teaching.<\/p>\n

I suppose a skeptical academic could draw wild and wonderful conclusions from that point: \u201cLook! The gospels attribute to Jesus something he didn\u2019t say! The whole New Testament is bogus!\u201d Obviously, there\u2019s no need to resort to such inverted fundamentalism. What the Jonah story shows, convincingly, is that the Gospels, like the rest of the New Testament, were written by people who had come to faith, and that faith informed their work. Nothing surprising there. Moreover, standard methods of historical criticism can help us determine just how the authors have interpreted their sources.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but absolute 100% literalism is impossible, because there are at least a few Biblical verses that nobody can accept in pure literal form. The obvious example is Joshua 10.12-13, which assumes […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[1270,534,536,535],"class_list":["post-2450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-philip-jenkins","tag-biblical-literalism","tag-historical-criticism","tag-q-gospel-source","tag-sign-of-jonah"],"yoast_head":"\nTHE SIGN OF JONAH<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"THE SIGN OF JONAH\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Anxious Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2013-11-22T07:32:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-11-11T21:10:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/files\/2013\/11\/Joshua-Commanding-the-Sun-to-Stand-Still-Upon-Gibeon-1816--300x194.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Philip Jenkins\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Philip Jenkins\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/\",\"name\":\"THE SIGN OF JONAH\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-11-22T07:32:17+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-11-11T21:10:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e\"},\"description\":\"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"THE SIGN OF JONAH\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\",\"name\":\"Anxious Bench\",\"description\":\"The Relevance of Religious History for Today\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e\",\"name\":\"Philip Jenkins\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Philip Jenkins\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/philipjenkins\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"THE SIGN OF JONAH","description":"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"THE SIGN OF JONAH","og_description":"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/","og_site_name":"Anxious Bench","article_published_time":"2013-11-22T07:32:17+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-11-11T21:10:57+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/files\/2013\/11\/Joshua-Commanding-the-Sun-to-Stand-Still-Upon-Gibeon-1816--300x194.jpg"}],"author":"Philip Jenkins","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Philip Jenkins","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/","name":"THE SIGN OF JONAH","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-11-22T07:32:17+00:00","dateModified":"2013-11-11T21:10:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e"},"description":"For many Christians, Biblical literalism is a fraught subject. My own theory is that one can be conservative to different degrees about such matters, but","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2013\/11\/the-sign-of-jonah\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"THE SIGN OF JONAH"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/","name":"Anxious Bench","description":"The Relevance of Religious History for Today","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e","name":"Philip Jenkins","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Philip Jenkins"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/philipjenkins\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2450"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2450\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}