A History of the Bible<\/em>.<\/p>\nWhile acknowledging much that is positive about the book, Swaim launches a basic attack on the historical critical method that it exemplifies. His complaint is that if we follow these principles as consistently and logically as John Barton does, we are basically left with nothing. That critical approach is in a sense an exercise in nihilism. Might that description fit such efforts in some cases? Certainly. But they don\u2019t apply to Barton.<\/p>\n
Let me offer Exhibit A in John Barton\u2019s defense. Here is Swaim:<\/p>\n
Historical-critical theories on the New Testament are a little more amenable to empirical corroboration. The dominant paradigm on the origins of the Gospels, for example, holds that the Synoptic accounts were second-century compilations of rumors and exaggerated tales about Jesus, written and edited long after anybody had any firm information about the man and his deeds. But the Gospels, as Richard Bauckham cogently demonstrated in his 2006 book \u201cJesus and the Eyewitnesses,\u201d simply aren\u2019t written that way. The Gospel-writers frequently use names, dates, specific locations and odd details, as if to invite readers to verify their claims. Mr. Bauckham\u2019s book shook the field of New Testament studies when it appeared. Mr. Barton, scandalously in my view, doesn\u2019t mention the book or list it in his lengthy bibliography. <\/em><\/p>\nYou might want to read that again, as it is so off the wall.<\/p>\n
Let me begin with Swaim\u2019s \u201cdominant paradigm\u201d sentence, which is simply incorrect at every stage, almost in every word. Please find me a competent scholar on the Synoptics who dates them in the second century. A near universal consensus gives the original date of Mark as around 70-75, and Matthew and Luke in the next twenty years or so, before the mid-90s. And do remember the sheer size of the field we are talking about, which is inconceivably vast.<\/p>\n
If there is debate in the field, it is between people like me who hold to the genuine \u201cdominant paradigm\u201d theory of dating (ie 70-90 or so) versus those who favor earlier dates, pre-70. None of those periods counts as second century. Clearly, that goes far beyond a mere chronological quibble. The standard dating for the Synoptics means that they were written at a time when authors or editors had access to direct personal, family, and communal traditions going back to the 30s, which would not be the case if they were second century.<\/p>\n
Almost as solid a consensus holds that the Synoptics draw on direct and extensive sources of strictly contemporary information for the events of Jesus\u2019s era. A sizable and respectable group of scholars believes that Mark is drawing on some contact with Peter himself. It is precisely because the apostolic generation is dying out that Mark seemingly determined to collect what could be found of their experiences and stories. By the start of the second century, quotations from all the Synoptics are appearing in Christian writings.<\/p>\n
I seriously have no idea where Swaim, who is as I say a smart and curious writer, found that utterly weird \u201cdominant paradigm\u201d sentence, which describes something more like a Da Vinci Code<\/em> approach than any accurate reflection of Biblical scholarship. The views he portrays are absolutely, categorically, not dominant, or even fringe respectable. Where on earth is he getting this?<\/p>\nI won\u2019t say much about Bauckham here, as he will be the subject of another blog in in the near future. Suffice it to say that I deeply admire all his writings, and that book in particular. But as summarized by Swaim, the account of Eyewitnesses<\/em> is so generic as to be misleading. It is awfully easy to find ancient writings that \u201cfrequently use names, dates, specific locations and odd details, as if to invite readers to verify their claims,\u201d and which turn out to be forged, wrong, or misleading. And while Bauckham\u2019s book was well and respectfully received, it was nothing like the bombshell in the playground of the Biblical scholars that Swaim implies. They read it, admired its intelligence and critical acumen, and absorbed its arguments where appropriate. The contrast that Swaim suggests between Bauckham and the bulk of \u201chistorical critical\u201d scholars does not exist.<\/p>\nPersonally, I would have tended to include Bauckham\u2019s book in the bibliography of a book like this, but the range of possible works from which to choose is, again, enormous.<\/p>\n
I have no problems with critical reviews of any book, but they should not make statements that are flat wrong. Why did the Journal<\/em> let this one through?<\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton Swaim. I say that before disagreeing with him in a major way on his most recent offering, a highly critical reading of John Barton\u2019s important new book A History of the Bible. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001,"featured_media":48036,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[1762,5658,2073,5664,5661],"class_list":["post-47937","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-philip-jenkins","tag-barton-swaim","tag-john-barton","tag-new-testament","tag-richard-bauckham","tag-synoptics"],"yoast_head":"\n
When Reviews Go Strange<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When Reviews Go Strange\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Anxious Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-13T04:29:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-07-16T20:48:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2019\/07\/71UfpYW6qsL.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"509\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Philip Jenkins\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Philip Jenkins\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/\",\"name\":\"When Reviews Go Strange\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-07-13T04:29:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-07-16T20:48:38+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e\"},\"description\":\"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When Reviews Go Strange\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\",\"name\":\"Anxious Bench\",\"description\":\"The Relevance of Religious History for Today\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e\",\"name\":\"Philip Jenkins\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Philip Jenkins\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/philipjenkins\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When Reviews Go Strange","description":"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When Reviews Go Strange","og_description":"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/","og_site_name":"Anxious Bench","article_published_time":"2019-07-13T04:29:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-07-16T20:48:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":509,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2019\/07\/71UfpYW6qsL.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Philip Jenkins","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Philip Jenkins","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/","name":"When Reviews Go Strange","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-13T04:29:09+00:00","dateModified":"2019-07-16T20:48:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e"},"description":"When I read the excellent reviews offered by the Wall Street Journal, I always enjoy pieces by the versatile, well-informed, and wide-ranging Barton","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2019\/07\/when-reviews-go-strange\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When Reviews Go Strange"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/","name":"Anxious Bench","description":"The Relevance of Religious History for Today","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/aad511b5351a70dfdcd6c16b8c84b98e","name":"Philip Jenkins","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/187a8a071797bcef6623a84299fe91c8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Philip Jenkins"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/philipjenkins\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47937","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47937"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47937\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/48036"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47937"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47937"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47937"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}