{"id":89187,"date":"2022-11-30T06:00:12","date_gmt":"2022-11-30T10:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?p=89187"},"modified":"2022-11-30T02:32:44","modified_gmt":"2022-11-30T06:32:44","slug":"can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/","title":{"rendered":"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>Last month I asked <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/10\/can-pluralism-work-american-higher-education\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">whether pluralism can work<\/a> in American higher education. What are the possibilities? What are the potential pitfalls? Today I want to ask what might be an even more intriguing question: Can pluralism work in <em>Christian<\/em> higher education? What would that even mean? To explore these questions, I\u2019m thinking in conversation with George Marsden\u2019s excellent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Soul-American-University-Revisited-Postsecular\/dp\/0197607241\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Soul of the American University <\/em>Revisited: <em>From Protestant to Postsecular<\/em><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/10\/417rTVEjRbS.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-87835 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/10\/417rTVEjRbS-197x300.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"197\" height=\"300\"><\/a>As I explored last time, in his updated 2021 edition of his original 1994 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Soul-American-University-Establishment-Established\/dp\/0195070461\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Soul of the American University<\/em> <\/a>Marsden argues in a new final chapter before the new epilogue that commitment to diversity is the only moral commitment left in many secular colleges and universities. As I <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/10\/can-pluralism-work-american-higher-education\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">summarized<\/a>, he likewise argues that there are some real benefits to this commitment:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\"><em>Even at institutions that are mostly concerned with setting students up for economic success, this commitment at least works to grant this opportunity to more people. Diversity as a framework also lends itself to the very sort of ideological pluralism that Marsden called for in the first edition of Soul, namely the opportunity for explicit faith perspectives to have a seat at the table of scholarly conversation. Plus, a commitment to ideological and social diversity is necessary for a modern democracy to succeed, so a worthy mindset in which to train students.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>He also elaborates a drawback. Again, as I <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/10\/can-pluralism-work-american-higher-education\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">summarized<\/a>,<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\"><em>In short, humans are naturally tribal creatures and if universities make the one moral value diversity without a concurrent attempt to provide some sort of unifying vision of the good, we are all rather likely to retreat into our subcultures and to perceive other groups distrustfully. Marsden therefore joins contemporary commentators calling for some modern version of Martin Luther King, Jr.\u2019s beloved community. He realizes the challenges: what is outside the pale? When ought a campus to exclude a student group or an intellectual perspective for being insufficiently tolerant and when is that itself intolerance? It\u2019s actually not an easy question; all readers of this essay would probably agree that some things ought to be excluded, but we would likely disagree on where the line is.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>Could Christian higher education perhaps add something of value to the search to maximize the benefits of pluralism as a prominent moral value in American higher education while minimizing its drawbacks? \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_89193\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-89193\" style=\"width: 225px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/Baylor_Pat_Neff_2-scaled.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-89193 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/Baylor_Pat_Neff_2-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\"><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-89193\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><em>Pat Neff Hall, the administrative building of Baylor University. Courtesy of Wikimedia Commons because I didn\u2019t think to just take a picture today.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Because Marsden identifies the problem of pluralism, namely how to do it well, as the higher education moral question of the moment\u2014and rightly so I think\u2014I found the epilogue to this edition perplexing, even as I appreciated much about it. Entitled \u201cAn Unexpected Sequel: A Renaissance of Christian Academia,\u201d the epilogue traces the rise of interest among communities of scholars broadly associated with evangelical Protestantism in giving concerted thought to relating their faith to their scholarship and teaching. It covers the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries.<\/p>\n<p>And unless I missed it, there is not a single woman or person of color mentioned among the many names discussed in the chapter. As a reminder, Marsden does integrate the contributions of diverse Christian (and non-Christian) scholars, by name, into earlier parts of the book. So he is not ignoring that part of the Christian scholarly community. But he misses an opportunity to analyze the increasing importance of these scholars to the conversation about Christian scholarship in the book\u2019s conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>Now some of this is because Marsden gave pride of place in his narrative to the discipline of philosophy, which is notorious for how slow it has been to incorporate scholars who are women and people of color. He did so in part because of the discipline\u2019s chronological priority\u2014particularly in its Calvin College incarnation\u2014in framing the contemporary conversation on these issues. But in part I suspect he also did it out of humility, as the story could just as easily have been told through the lens of our discipline of history. Yet even if you told the story through our lens, Marsden\u2019s generation of evangelical scholars would look a little more inclusive, but not much.<\/p>\n<p>So I think we need to bring the story more robustly up to the present. The twenty-first century section of the chapter talks in more generalities, rather than in terms of particular figures like the earlier section. Some of this makes sense inasmuch as this was a time of flowering of Christian academic institutions. He shouts out Baylor\u2014thanks, George!\u2014as a relative success in thoughtfully integrating a distinctly Christian identity into a Protestant research university. And this section of the book also contains its single greatest passage: \u201cBy the 1990s, one of Notre Dame\u2019s aspirations was to be ranked as high academically as it was in football. That goal was surpassed some years later, though due only partially to a rise in academic standing\u201d (384). He likewise notes the increasing intellectual cooperation between Protestant and Catholic scholars, and not just because of our common experience with football fluctuations.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/31CtcfsmDAL.jpeg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-89190 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/31CtcfsmDAL-189x300.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"189\" height=\"300\"><\/a>What is missing, I think, is an analysis of how this chapter and the previous chapter tie together. <strong>What do Christian scholars and institutions have to offer an American higher educational landscape that is right to emphasize the need for social diversity, but is crying out for a compelling vision of the good that crosses social categories?<\/strong> Marsden briefly notes the tension that faculty at CCCU institutions were generally more politically and socially diverse than donors. Because most evangelical Protestant traditions lack any sort of magisterium to say what is in and out of doctrinal bounds, as Adam Laats has argued in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Fundamentalist-Keeping-American-Higher-Education\/dp\/0190665629\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><em>Fundamentalist U<\/em><\/a>, these institutions always have, to a certain extent, to play instead to public opinion within the tribe, which makes moving the intellectual or political needle of the church tricky. By contrast, Marsden notes that \u201cunlike more conservative Protestant constituencies and institutions, the outlooks of serious practicing Catholics come in a wide variety, from ultraconservative and traditionalist to highly liberal and progressive. These Catholics may worship together but seemingly disagree on just about everything else\u201d (388).<\/p>\n<p>But as I have argued before in <em>Fides et Historia<\/em>, all branches of Christianity have the resources to do this: \u201c[A]t least one of the reasons that there will be women and men from every nation, tribe, people, and language worshipping God together in the life to come (Rev 7:9) is that each sex and each culture has a unique experience of the effect of the gospel on our lives. Like facets of a diamond reflecting the divine image, we need to see and hear from one another in order to appreciate the fullness of the beauty of who God is.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">[1]<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Perhaps this is a way that Christian scholars and Christian institutions of higher education at our best can help to solve the problem of pluralism: by modeling it.<\/strong> If we are already platforming and listening to Christians different from us\u2014be it in terms of sex, race, denomination, or politics\u2014we can continue. If we see deficiencies here in our own lives, we can grow. <strong>Our common commitment to Christ enables us to do what it seems odd in the world to do: to disagree vehemently and still come together around a common purpose.<\/strong> Then the beautiful way that Marsden closes this edition may come true:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 40px\">One lesson of the past would seem to be that Christian and other religiously based higher education is better off when it recognizes, as is easy to do in our postsecular age, that it is a minority enterprise in a richly diverse society. As such, it will not be able to impose its will on others, but, rather, its challenge will be to make itself so attractive in its practices and outlooks that, despite its inevitable imperfection, others will admire it and want to emulate some of its qualities. As Thomas Kuhn observes in <em>The Structure of Scientific Revolutions<\/em>, people are persuaded of the merits of an alternate view not so much by argument as by how that view works for its followers: \u201cThey can say: I don\u2019t know how the proponents of the new view succeed, but I must learn whatever they are doing, it is clearly right\u201d (389).<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>With permission, this<\/em>\u00a0<em>post is adapted from my contribution to a roundtable on\u00a0<\/em>The Soul of the American University Revisited\u00a0<em>that will be published in a future issue of the journal\u00a0<\/em>Fides et Historia.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">[1]<\/a> Andrea L. Turpin, \u201cWhose Stories We Tell and How We Tell Them: Honoring Christ in Choosing Topics and Analytical Lenses,\u201d Roundtable on Christian Scholarship: For Such a Time as This, <em>Fides et Historia<\/em> 51:1 (Winter\/Spring 2019): 94\u201399, 95\u201396.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last month I asked whether pluralism can work in American higher education. What are the possibilities? What are the potential pitfalls? Today I want to ask what might be an even more intriguing question: Can pluralism work in Christian higher education? What would that even mean? To explore these questions, I\u2019m thinking in conversation with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4182,"featured_media":89193,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5634,118],"tags":[5453,2137,3109,2780,2340,293,9085,9222],"class_list":["post-89187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-andrea-turpin","category-education","tag-adam-laats","tag-baylor-university","tag-calvin-college","tag-christian-colleges","tag-fides-et-historia","tag-george-marsden","tag-the-soul-of-the-american-university","tag-university-of-notre-dame"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Anxious Bench\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-11-30T10:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-11-30T06:32:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/Baylor_Pat_Neff_2-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"576\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Andrea L. Turpin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@AndreaLTurpin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Andrea L. Turpin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/\",\"name\":\"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2022-11-30T10:00:12+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2022-11-30T06:32:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/d11ddf3d184349409e2d9c37c203e7dc\"},\"description\":\"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/\",\"name\":\"Anxious Bench\",\"description\":\"The Relevance of Religious History for Today\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/d11ddf3d184349409e2d9c37c203e7dc\",\"name\":\"Andrea L. Turpin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6ac81ef33365b73332e2b97f481ce3f8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6ac81ef33365b73332e2b97f481ce3f8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Andrea L. Turpin\"},\"description\":\"Andrea L. Turpin is Associate Professor of History at Baylor University and a Resident Scholar at Baylor\u2019s Institute for the Study of Religion. She holds degrees from Princeton University, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and the University of Notre Dame. Her research focuses on nineteenth- and twentieth-century American history, especially religious and intellectual history, women\u2019s and gender history, and the history of higher education. Andrea is the author of A New Moral Vision: Gender, Religion, and the Changing Purposes of American Higher Education, 1837-1917, which explores how the entrance of women into U.S. colleges and universities shaped changing ideas about the moral and religious purposes of higher education in unexpected ways, and in turn profoundly shaped American culture. The book has won three awards: the 2018 biennial Linda Eisenmann Prize from the History of Education Society, the 2017 Lilly Fellows Program Biennial Book Award, and Baylor University\u2019s 2016 Guittard Book Award for Historical Scholarship. Her current book project, tentatively entitled\u00a0A Debate of Their Own: Educated Women in the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy, positions college-educated women as key players in the narrative of the Protestant fundamentalist-modernist controversy of the early twentieth century, the split between theological and social liberals and conservatives which many credit with giving birth to the modern culture wars. Andrea serves on the Council of the American Society of Church History and is co-chair of the Higher Education affinity group of the History of Education Society. She has also blogged at Religion in American History. You can follow her on twitter @AndreaLTurpin.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.baylor.edu\/history\/index.php?id=86138\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AndreaLTurpin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/aturpin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?","description":"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?","og_description":"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/","og_site_name":"Anxious Bench","article_published_time":"2022-11-30T10:00:12+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-11-30T06:32:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":576,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/168\/2022\/11\/Baylor_Pat_Neff_2-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Andrea L. Turpin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@AndreaLTurpin","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Andrea L. Turpin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/","name":"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-11-30T10:00:12+00:00","dateModified":"2022-11-30T06:32:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/d11ddf3d184349409e2d9c37c203e7dc"},"description":"Can Christian higher education add something new to the conversation on how best to pursue pluralism in American higher education?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/2022\/11\/can-pluralism-work-in-christian-higher-education\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can Pluralism Work in Christian Higher Education?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/","name":"Anxious Bench","description":"The Relevance of Religious History for Today","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/d11ddf3d184349409e2d9c37c203e7dc","name":"Andrea L. Turpin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6ac81ef33365b73332e2b97f481ce3f8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/6ac81ef33365b73332e2b97f481ce3f8?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Andrea L. Turpin"},"description":"Andrea L. Turpin is Associate Professor of History at Baylor University and a Resident Scholar at Baylor\u2019s Institute for the Study of Religion. She holds degrees from Princeton University, Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, and the University of Notre Dame. Her research focuses on nineteenth- and twentieth-century American history, especially religious and intellectual history, women\u2019s and gender history, and the history of higher education. Andrea is the author of A New Moral Vision: Gender, Religion, and the Changing Purposes of American Higher Education, 1837-1917, which explores how the entrance of women into U.S. colleges and universities shaped changing ideas about the moral and religious purposes of higher education in unexpected ways, and in turn profoundly shaped American culture. The book has won three awards: the 2018 biennial Linda Eisenmann Prize from the History of Education Society, the 2017 Lilly Fellows Program Biennial Book Award, and Baylor University\u2019s 2016 Guittard Book Award for Historical Scholarship. Her current book project, tentatively entitled\u00a0A Debate of Their Own: Educated Women in the Fundamentalist-Modernist Controversy, positions college-educated women as key players in the narrative of the Protestant fundamentalist-modernist controversy of the early twentieth century, the split between theological and social liberals and conservatives which many credit with giving birth to the modern culture wars. Andrea serves on the Council of the American Society of Church History and is co-chair of the Higher Education affinity group of the History of Education Society. She has also blogged at Religion in American History. You can follow her on twitter @AndreaLTurpin.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.baylor.edu\/history\/index.php?id=86138","https:\/\/twitter.com\/AndreaLTurpin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/author\/aturpin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4182"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89187"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89187\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/89193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/anxiousbench\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}