{"id":11791,"date":"2015-02-22T01:21:46","date_gmt":"2015-02-22T06:21:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/?p=11791"},"modified":"2015-03-13T22:46:17","modified_gmt":"2015-03-14T02:46:17","slug":"forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/","title":{"rendered":"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards&#8211; Part Four"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/55\/2015\/02\/rrh.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/55\/2015\/02\/rrh.jpg\" alt=\"rrh\" width=\"183\" height=\"176\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-11767\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In his chapter about Matthew\u2019s use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative claims about Jesus and linking them to specific OT texts, often citing those texts, and in the birth narrative especially using fulfillment formulae. He begins by noticing the ways in which Matthew 24 modifies Mk. 13, the apocalyptic discourse, for instance by specifying that the \u2018abomination\u2019 will take place in the Holy Place, the Temple. It is Matthew who makes crystal clear that Jesus is the fulfillment of Israel\u2019s Scriptures,with some ten quotations using the fulfillment formula (Mt. 1.22-23; 2.15,17-18,23; 4.14-16; 8.17;12.17-21; 13.35; 21.4-5, and 27.9 and some late mss. have this formula at 27.35, though this is likely an interpolation based on Jn. 19.24 as Hays says on p.120). As Hays notes, about half of these formulae appear before Jesus is even baptized (if you add 2.5-6 and 3.3).  So Hays concludes \u201cIsrael\u2019s sacred history is presented by Matthew as an elaborate figurative tapestry designed to point forward to Jesus and his activity.\u201d (p. 37).   There are about 61 quotations of the OT in Matthew, and so as Hays says, the formula quotations make up a distinct minority of them.  This is not counting the many allusions or echoes. <\/p>\n<p>Then there is the indirect suggestion along the way that Jesus is the fulfillment not just of texts and prophecies and even institutions like the Temple sacrifices, but he is the fulfillment of OT precursors like Moses, David, the Suffering Servant (and I would add, though Richard doesn\u2019t, Solomon and Wisdom).<\/p>\n<p>Richard makes much of the fact that from the outset Jesus is presented as Emmanuel, namely the embodied presence of Israel\u2019s God.  But in what sense is God made manifest in Jesus (p. 39)?  Hays of course draws attention to the \u2018out of Egypt I called my son\u2019 to show that not only is Jesus depicted as God manifest, but also as the one in whom the fate of Israel is embodied and enacted.  The question is, whether Jesus is just seen as the fulfiller of Israel\u2019s mission and purpose, or in fact Israel narrowed down to just one true Israelite. The use of Hos. 11.1 of Jesus raises this question quite directly.  On p. 41 Hays concludes \u201cThe fulfillment of the prophet Hosea\u2019s words can be discerned only through an act of imagination that perceives the figural correspondence between the two stories of the exodus and the gospel\u201d (p. 41).   He takes Mt. 2.17-18 where Jerm.31 is being cited as an example of metalepsis, in other words, the larger Jeremiah context is alluded to (see 31.15-17 in toto) and the knowing of it helps fill out what Matthew is driving at. <\/p>\n<p>Another good example of making something more explicit in Matthew than we find in the parallel in Mark is the story of Jesus\u2019 walking on water and getting into the disciple\u2019s boat cf. Mk. 6.51-52 where the disciples fail to understand due to hardening of the spiritual arteries, but in Mt. 14.33 they worship Jesus and call him the true Son of God. This is one of various worshipping of Jesus scenes in this Gospel\u2013the magi (2.2,11), the leper (8.2), the ruler of the synagogue (9.18), the Canaanite woman (15.25), the mother of James and John (20.20), the two Marys (28.9), the disciples at the resurrection appearance in Galilee (28.17). <\/p>\n<p>I do find it somewhat strange that on p. 46  Richard suggests that Jesus takes the place of the Law, as well as the place of the divine presence previously attributed to the Shekinah (p. 46).  Surely what takes the place of the Law or further fills out the Law, is the teaching of Jesus for instance in the Sermon on the Mount.  In any case, the reason Jesus\u2019 words will not pass away is because his words are God\u2019s Words  see Is. 40.7-8.  Only God can make that sort of claim about their words. <\/p>\n<p>An interesting parallel is drawn between Gen. 28 and Mt. 28 where Jesus says he is with the disciples until the end of the age. Jesus now stands in the place where the Lord God stood in Jacob\u2019s dream (p. 50).  Hays makes the case that Matthew incorporated the Markan material that makes a distinction between Jesus and God, while at the same time heightening the material which emphasizes in a more direct way the divine identity of Jesus.  On p. 53 he says that Jesus and God are not simply identified, the relationship is complex.  In other words, there is a more drastic reorganization of Israel\u2019s religious language in Matthew than in Mark.          <\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In his chapter about Matthew\u2019s use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative claims about Jesus and linking them to specific OT texts, often citing those texts, and in the birth narrative especially using fulfillment formulae. He begins by noticing the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In his chapter about Matthew&#039;s use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In his chapter about Matthew&#039;s use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Bible and Culture\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-02-22T06:21:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-14T02:46:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/files\/2015\/02\/rrh.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Ben Witherington\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ben Witherington\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/\",\"name\":\"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-02-22T06:21:46+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-14T02:46:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/67da39aff728f9d015878d198839df4b\"},\"description\":\"In his chapter about Matthew's use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards&#8211; Part Four\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/\",\"name\":\"The Bible and Culture\",\"description\":\"A One-Stop Shop for All Things Biblical and Christian\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/67da39aff728f9d015878d198839df4b\",\"name\":\"Ben Witherington\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8cf1998568f0b6ccbd63f56b44d47303?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8cf1998568f0b6ccbd63f56b44d47303?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ben Witherington\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/author\/benw333\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four","description":"In his chapter about Matthew's use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four","og_description":"In his chapter about Matthew's use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/","og_site_name":"The Bible and Culture","article_published_time":"2015-02-22T06:21:46+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-14T02:46:17+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/files\/2015\/02\/rrh.jpg"}],"author":"Ben Witherington","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ben Witherington","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/","name":"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards-- Part Four","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-02-22T06:21:46+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-14T02:46:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/67da39aff728f9d015878d198839df4b"},"description":"In his chapter about Matthew's use of the OT, Richard begins by making the valid point that Matthew shows far less reticence than Mark in making narrative","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/2015\/02\/22\/forward-thinking-on-reading-backwards-part\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Forward Thinking on Reading Backwards&#8211; Part Four"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/","name":"The Bible and Culture","description":"A One-Stop Shop for All Things Biblical and Christian","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/67da39aff728f9d015878d198839df4b","name":"Ben Witherington","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8cf1998568f0b6ccbd63f56b44d47303?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8cf1998568f0b6ccbd63f56b44d47303?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Ben Witherington"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/author\/benw333\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/91"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/bibleandculture\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}