![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/55\/2011\/11\/BirthOfChrist.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n LOGOS LOGIC
\n\t\t\t (John 1. 1-18)<\/p>\n
TRAILING CLOUDS OF GLORY
\nTallula Bankhead was undoubtedly one of the most flamboyant and colorful women of her era. She talked loud, she dressed loud, she was not known for her subtlety. She was also not much given to attending church. But on one occasion she heard that there was to be some real pageantry and ceremony at the local Catholic Cathedral for a famous bishop was coming to town for a special worship service. She decided she wanted to go and see what was happened. Characteristically, she got there early so she could have the seat of her choosing (realizing I suppose that \u2018many are called but pews are chosen\u2019) and she positioned herself right on the aisle in the second row so she could look down the aisle and see the whole procession. <\/p>\n
The service began promptly on time with the organ cranking up, and then the acolytes and the crucifier started down the aisle followed by the choir, the priests of that particular diocese and finally the bishop himself. The bishop was decked out in a shimmering gold robe, and he had chosen to perform the role of carrying the incenser himself. As he began to proceed down the aisle he was swinging the incenser mightily to the rhythm of the music, and the clouds of incense were going up. Indeed one could say that the whole congregation was getting incensed so permeating was the smell. Finally the bishop reached the spot where Tullula was positioned, standing as was the whole congregation for the procession, and instinctively she reached out and tugged on the bishop\u2019s robe as he went by and said\u2014 \u201cDarling your gown is divine, but your purse is on fire.\u201d \t<\/p>\n
The Son of God, unlike the bishop, did not enter the world trailing clouds of glory nor was there a great congregation standing at attention when he came. As we learn at every Christmas, Jesus came into the world in a humble manner and by humble means\u2014a feeding trough in the back of some relative\u2019s house in all probability It has been said that he came this way to make clear that no one, and no condition of life was beneath his dignity. He stooped to conquer, he condescended so we might be lifted up. <\/p>\n
\tBut lest we think that Jesus only came from Bethlehem into this world, the prologue to the Gospel of John suggests a much longer journey from a place much further away, a journey set in motion from before the foundation of the world. The first paragraph of John\u2019s Gospel is actually part of a hymn, or at least hymnic prose, and it tells the story of the Word. We are meant to hear echoes of the beginning of Genesis\u2014 \u201cin the beginning God created the heavens and the earth\u201d. How did he do it? By speaking a word into the void. Our Evangelist is telling us that God\u2019s work of creation had a sequel which was without equal\u2014 the work of redemption.<\/p>\n
WORD UP, ABOUT THE WORD THAT CAME DOWN <\/p>\n
\tIt was C.S. Lewis who said when the author of the play walks on the stage, you know that the play is over, but in this case we are being told that the author of the whole human drama has come on the scene to fix and finish what we had marred and messed up. He is called here the Word or in Greek the Logos. Our Evangelist believes that where a person has come from, and how far they have come tells us a lot about that person and indeed this is true. It is being suggested that we should in one sense judge a person by how far they have come in life, not how far they have gone. Some people after all are born on third base and think they hit a triple. <\/p>\n
\tBut in the case of the Logos there could have been no one who came from further away or longer ago, and no who could have come further to save you and me. The Evangelist says that the Word existed before the foundation of the universe, indeed the Word was co-creator of the universe, such that human creatures were all made in his image. Indeed it even goes so far as to call \u2018the Word\u2019 God here. We learn later in the hymn that it is the only begotten Son of God who is called both the Word and God in this hymn, which means there is more than one person in the Godhead. This is, to say the least heavy stuff. God in the end didn\u2019t just send another angelic or a merely human messenger, be it prophet, priest or king. God cared enough to send the very best\u2014 God came in person, in the person of the only begotten Son. <\/p>\n
\tBut why is he called the Word or Logos here? Because the author wants to make clear that if you are trying to figure out the mind, the wisdom, the logic, the sense of God you need to consider his only begotten Son. He is God\u2019s plan for redemption come in the flesh. The Son of God may not be all we would like to know about God, but in terms of salvation it is all we need to know about God. God comes as Jesus, and we may trust that God is indeed like Jesus. If you want to figure out the character, nature, plan, hopes, dreams of God, you only need look at his Son\u2014 he\u2019s the spitting image of the Father.<\/p>\n
DARKNESS AT THE EDGE OF DAWN<\/p>\n
But this story is very much like a Rembrandt painting\u2014there is darkness which surrounds and frames the piercingly bright light of the Word. Imagine a creator God who made creatures who rejected him. Nothing can be more tragic than when children repudiate their parents, but this is exactly what we are told was afoot in the human drama\u2014 \u201che came unto his own, but his own received him not.\u201d Jesus the Jew arrives in Judea saying \u201cfamily I am home\u201d, and the locals received him not, indeed the so-called king of the Jews tries to kill him. He stands up in the synagogue in Nazareth, and his neighbors receive him not. In John\u2019s Gospel we are even told that Jesus\u2019 brothers, befuddled and bewildered and envious of their brother (like the story of Joseph and his brothers), did not believe in him during his ministry (Jn. 7.5). Jesus instead had to enlist the least, the last, and the lost as his disciples, IRS men and fishermen and revolutionaries, an odd gaggle of geese, and they often appear not as the Magnificent Twelve but as the Dirty Dozen, or better said, as the DUH-CIPLES. Jesus\u2019s kin and neighbors and Jewish relatives didn\u2019t exactly role out the red carpet for him. His own disciples don\u2019t quite understand him. <\/p>\n
\tIn John\u2019s Gospel, the prologue is everything to understanding what follows, because unless you know where Jesus actually came from, which is to say, from God and as God, you are not going to understand Jesus. His story will sound more like a fractured fairy tale than the Gospel truth if you do not know this essential truth\u2013 that Jesus is the incarnation of God. John puts it this way\u2014 \u201cthe Word took on flesh\u201d.
\nThe pre-existent divine Son of God took on a human nature in the womb of Mary without ceasing to be the divine Son of God. That\u2019s a mouth full and it is called the Incarnation. John Donne put it this way\u2014 \u201ctwas much when man was made like God long before\/ but that God should be made like man, much more\u201d. <\/p>\n
The mind, the character, the nature, the plan of God was all revealed in this one person\u2014 Jesus. It\u2019s a staggering assertion. That is God\u2019s logic and the logical solution to our dilemma. We sometimes thing, as the British would say, that it is over-egging the pudding to say that this person or that person is \u201cthe greatest person who ever lived\u201d but in this case, there is no human rhetoric grand enough to encompass this truth. Jesus is hands down the greatest person to have ever existed.
\nIn John\u2019s Gospel if you know that the Word came from God, as God, and returns to God, you know the whole arc of the story of the Son of God. The earthly ministry is just the middle act of the drama, and you all know how befuddling it can be to come in, in the middle of movie\u2013 even more so in the middle of the story of our redemption.<\/p>\n
LOGOS LOGIC<\/p>\n
One of my college chums was Thomas V. Morris. We took religion and philosophy classes together at Carolina and he went on to become a famous philosopher teaching at Notre Dame, winning national college teacher of the year awards. He now spends his time speaking to Fortune 500 companies about a philosophy of business and success and lives at Wrightsville Beach N.C. Lucky Him! <\/p>\n
While he was still at Notre Dame he wrote an important book entitled \u201cThe Logic of God Incarnate\u201d. One of the profound things he says in this book is not that God came so we could know he was real, and could even identify with God (as the popular song says \u201cwhat if God was one of us\u2026.\u201d) though that is true. No, the Logic of God Incarnate involves the notion that Jesus did not come just to hang out with us, or show God was real. We needed more than just to know that God cared.
\nRather Jesus came to die for us. We needed more than just an answer to the question\u2014 is God real and can He relate to human beings? We need a solution to the human dilemma. The dilemma may be summed up as follows\u2013 that we have all fallen and we can\u2019t get up. Jesus himself explains the Logic of the Logos coming in person when he says \u201cthe Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve and to give his life as a ransom in place of the many.\u201d Jesus was the man born to die. It is a paradoxical logic, but nonetheless one we can not live without if the least the last and the lost are to become the first the most and the found. <\/p>\n
In John\u2019s Gospel Jesus doesn\u2019t just give the resurrection he is the resurrection. He doesn\u2019t just offer life, he is eternal life. He doesn\u2019t just show the way, he is the way\u2014and when he says \u201cbefore Abraham was, I am\u201d he is claiming to have existed before the time of Abraham, indeed to have existed as God before all time. This is the Savior who came to us in the person of Jesus. The question is\u2014 could we possibly take in, comprehend, grasp anything this monumental, this stupendous?
\nWe might well be led to feel like that Peanuts strip where Charlie, Lucy and Linus are looking up at the clouds and describing what they imagine they see in the clouds. Linus speaks first and says \u201cI see Beethoven composing a piano sonata\u201d. Lucy says, \u201cI see Van Gogh painting his famous Starry Night painting\u201d. She then turns to Charlie Brown and says \u201cWhat do you see Charlie Brown?\u201d He responds: \u201cI was going to say I see a ducky and a pony, but I think I\u2019ll just hush.\u201d Perhaps we feel a bit like Charlie Brown in the presence of this great wonder and mystery. It has been said of this Gospel that in John, Jesus bestrides the stage of history like a God, or it has also been said that this Gospel is shallow enough for a baby to wade in, but deep enough for an elephant to drown. How true\u2014 can we possibly understand the logic of this plan and this person the divine Son of God?<\/p>\n
THE LAST WORD
\n\tWell yes in fact we can. God boiled the whole salvation plan down into a one-man mission, sending his only begotten Son to pull it off, and on top of which, his Son sent the Holy Spirit so we could understand it, and be convicted, convinced, and converted. In the Prologue we come to a climax when it says \u201cand we beheld his glory, glory as of the only begotten of the Father. For the Law came through Moses, but grace and truth through Jesus Christ.\u201d If we unpack this a bit here is a short course in Johannine vocabulary\u2014 light in this poem means revelation, life means salvation, glory means the radiant presence of God, grace means God\u2019s undeserved favor, and hopefully truth speaks for itself. Certainly when Jesus came, Truth spoke for himself. <\/p>\n
We are being told its one stop shopping with Jesus\u2014 he is all the things we need wrapped up in one person to save the soul, renew the mind, give hope to the heart, heal the wounds of outrageous fortune, bind us together, create a more perfect union of believers, save the world. And best of all we are being told that if the first disciples, who were theologically challenged, could receive it, believe it, even begin to understand it\u2014if they could see the radiant presence of God in the face of Jesus, so can we. <\/p>\n
\tI must leave you with a final story. I was sitting in the lobby of Joseph-Beth Booksellers in Lexington the other day and there was a mother with her ever so inquisitive child trundling along beside her. The child kept asking his mother about hell. He asked, \u201ccould I ever do something bad enough to go to hell?\u201d His mother said \u201cI can\u2019t imagine a child doing something that bad.\u201d He kept pressing the issue. But \u201cwho would guard me and keep me from going there? You are my mommy, you wouldn\u2019t let me go there, would you? You would rescue me, right?\u201d The young boy\u2019s mother on the verge of both exasperation and tears said \u201cof course we would rescue you, your parents love you and would never allow you to go there.\u201d This seemed to satisfy him.
\nJohn\u2019s Gospel has a similar answer. It says that though we have in fact gone into the dark, though we have in fact loved darkness more than light, though we have lost our way, though we may feel we could never comprehend, never mind deserve to be saved, yet \u201cGod so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son such that whosoever believes in him, shall not perish, but have everlasting Life.\u201d God came all the way down the stairsteps of heaven to rescue his lost and straying children, he came in the person of Jesus, he called us by name, he took us by the hand, and he will not lead us astray\u2014 and each one us, each one us has an opportunity to behold his glory, receive his grace, and know his truth. And that indeed is the logic of the Logos, the Word which came down and took on flesh. <\/p>\n
AMEN<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
LOGOS LOGIC (John 1. 1-18) TRAILING CLOUDS OF GLORY Tallula Bankhead was undoubtedly one of the most flamboyant and colorful women of her era. She talked loud, she dressed loud, she was not known for her subtlety. She was also not much given to attending church. But on one occasion she heard that there was […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":91,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2302","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n