CNA\/EWTN News<\/a>).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic.<\/p>\n\t\u201cPart of freedom is going to have to be the right to disagree about the truth,\u201d Ryan Anderson, a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, proposed at \u201cUnfinished Business: The Atlantic LGBT Summit\u201d on Dec.10.<\/p>\n
\tAnderson was addressing the topic of civil rights and civil liberties, with regard to the proposed anti-discrimination Equality Act.<\/p>\n
\tAlthough the Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that same-sex marriage is legal nationwide, there are still \u201cdisparate views\u201d on marriage and sexuality, he noted. The \u201cbig question\u201d is whether these views will co-exist or beliefs in traditional marriage will be silenced by federal anti-discrimination legislation.<\/p>\n
\t\u201cDo we want to impose an orthodoxy for the entire nation, enforceable by law, or do we want to let this solve itself out by saying that diversity and pluralism and tolerance is really the best of the American tradition?\u201d he asked.<\/p>\n
\t\u201cAnd so you can agree to disagree, and peaceful coexistence is acknowledging that there are going to be people who disagree with you, and they still have the right to think what they think and live their lives in accordance with those beliefs.\u201d<\/p>\n
\tThe Equality Act, introduced in July, would create a protected class of sexual orientation and gender identity \u2013 just as race is protected against unlawful discrimination in the Civil Rights Act \u2013 and it would extend anti-discrimination protections for sexual orientation and gender identity to areas of employment, housing, credit, jury duty, and education.<\/p>\n
\tIt would apply to public accommodations, which were originally defined as places like hospitals, gas stations, restaurants, and theaters in the Civil Rights Act, but would now mean most any private business that serves the public, Anderson explained in a Nov. 30 report.<\/p>\n
\tSupporters like the Human Rights Campaign claim that although same-sex couples can legally marry in all 50 states, they can be refused goods like housing because of their marriage status, and can supposedly be \u201cfired simply for getting married and wearing their wedding ring to the office the next day.\u201d Broad anti-discrimination protections are needed to ensure this doesn\u2019t happen, they argue.<\/p>\n
\tThe bill was introduced in the House this past summer. It currently sits in the House Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice and has 170 co-sponsors in the House and 39 in the Senate, all Democrats or Independents.<\/p>\n
\tPublications like the New York Times and Minneapolis Star-Tribune have endorsed the bill, and corporations like PayPal, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple and Microsoft have supported \u201cLGBT non-discrimination protections,\u201d according to the Human Rights Campaign.<\/p>\n
\tDemocratic presidential candidates Hillary Clinton, Bernie Sanders, and Martin O\u2019Malley have endorsed it, as well as the White House.<\/p>\n
\t\u201cThat bill is historic legislation that would advance the cause of\u00a0equality\u00a0for millions of Americans,\u201d stated White House press secretary John Earnest on Nov. 10. He added that it would enhance civil liberty protections while maintaining religious freedom.<\/p>\n
\tLegal experts have warned that while the bill contains many \u201cgood\u201d anti-discrimination protections of civil liberties, it is so broad and vague that it could easily be used to silence the religious beliefs of anyone who believes that marriage is between a man and a woman.<\/p>\n
\tFor instance, its prohibitions on \u201cexclusion,\u201d \u201charassment,\u201d and \u201cunfair treatment\u201d could be interpreted as a ban on voicing moral opposition to same-sex marriage because such statements could discomfort someone else.<\/p>\n
\tThere are already lawsuits against small businesses that refuse to cater same-sex weddings, Anderson noted at the Atlantic summit. He gave the example of Washington state florist Barronelle Stutzman, who has employed gay people before and served same-sex couples but not same-sex weddings. She faces a discrimination lawsuit from the ACLU and the State of Washington for not serving a same-sex wedding.<\/p>\n
\tThis clash of beliefs is ultimately a test of a free and pluralistic society, Anderson said. Instead of free and public debate about the nature of marriage and sexuality, and the freedom of business owners to operate according to their religious beliefs, federal legislation could force everybody to respect one set of beliefs.<\/p>\n
\tAnd this legislation is by nature \u201ca very blunt instrument\u201d and \u201cnot a finely-tuned, finely-crafted mechanism for fixing these problems,\u201d Anderson said. People aren\u2019t just going to change their deeply-held religious beliefs \u201covernight,\u201d and \u201cit would be a mistake if the government tried to do that under the penalty of law.\u201d<\/p>\n
\tThe Equality Act doesn\u2019t even contain \u201cmeager\u201d religious liberty protections, he explained in his Nov. 30 report, and nullifies any protections under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act for a person who believes that marriage is between a man and a woman and is \u201ccharged with \u2018discrimination\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n
\tReligious freedom is higher than civil law, Anderson maintained, citing James Madison that \u201cthere\u2019s a duty that takes precedent to civil society, and that\u2019s a duty that every individual owes to the Creator, in how he or she understands the nature of that Creator and the nature of that duty.\u201d<\/p>\n
\tMadison saw religious freedom as a \u201cnatural right,\u201d he added, and recognized that \u201cthe government can\u2019t coerce religious action, they can\u2019t place undue burdens on religious practice.\u201d<\/p>\n
\tThis is already the case with pacifists who refuse the military draft and pro-life doctors who refuse to perform an abortion, he explained. Although the Supreme Court recognized a woman\u2019s legal right to an abortion in Roe v. Wade, he said, that decision did not recognize the duty that all doctors must perform abortions.<\/p>\n
\t\u201cWhat the Equality Act would do is more or less render a belief that\u2019s common to all of the Abrahamic faith traditions \u2013 so Orthodox Jews, Roman Catholics, Evangelical Christians, Latter-Day Saints, and many other people, who share that belief system wouldn\u2019t be able to live it out at their workplace, at their school, at their charity,\u201d Anderson said.<\/p>\n
\n
![](\"https:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~ff\/catholicnewsagency\/dailynews?d=yIl2AUoC8zA\")
<\/a>\n<\/div>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/feeds.feedburner.com\/~r\/catholicnewsagency\/dailynews\/~4\/ZiqqPRY2rXg\")
<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic.<\/p>\n
\t“Part…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1031,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-12324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-us"],"yoast_head":"\n
Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Catholic News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.catholicnewsagency.com\/images\/size340\/Bride_wedding_marriage_Credit_Brandon_Morgan_via_Unpslash_CNA_5_20_15.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"CNA Daily News\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"CNA Daily News\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/\",\"name\":\"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/35d4bd7addc580050842c844a11575f1\"},\"description\":\"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/\",\"name\":\"Catholic News\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/35d4bd7addc580050842c844a11575f1\",\"name\":\"CNA Daily News\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f1180c7dca7995d4a997aac72a3a88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f1180c7dca7995d4a997aac72a3a88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"CNA Daily News\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.catholicnewsagency.com\/\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/author\/cna-daily-news\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?","description":"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?","og_description":"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/","og_site_name":"Catholic News","article_published_time":"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.catholicnewsagency.com\/images\/size340\/Bride_wedding_marriage_Credit_Brandon_Morgan_via_Unpslash_CNA_5_20_15.jpg"}],"author":"CNA Daily News","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"CNA Daily News","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/","name":"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-15T10:01:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/35d4bd7addc580050842c844a11575f1"},"description":"Washington D.C., Dec 15, 2015 \/ 03:01 am (CNA\/EWTN News).- The future of a diverse and pluralistic public square is at stake in the debate over marriage and sexuality, said one legal scholar at an event in D.C. sponsored by the Atlantic. “Part...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/2015\/12\/will-we-be-allowed-to-disagree-about-marriage-in-the-future\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Will we be allowed to disagree about marriage in the future?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/","name":"Catholic News","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/35d4bd7addc580050842c844a11575f1","name":"CNA Daily News","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f1180c7dca7995d4a997aac72a3a88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8f1180c7dca7995d4a997aac72a3a88a?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"CNA Daily News"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.catholicnewsagency.com\/"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/author\/cna-daily-news\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1031"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=12324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/12324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=12324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=12324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/catholicnews\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=12324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![](\"https:\/\/www.catholicnewsagency.com\/images\/size340\/Bride_wedding_marriage_Credit_Brandon_Morgan_via_Unpslash_CNA_5_20_15.jpg\")
<\/p>\n