Pornography is single-handedly one of the worst epidemics facing the Evangelical church today. There are a myriad of other factors which appear to be eroding the Western church from the inside-out, yet Evangelicals scarcely address the root of the problem of pornography within the church. On the whole, human sexuality is undergoing an existential crisis. Yet the church is placed squarely in the midst of this crisis, often not even addressing its own underlying issues until far too late. Leader after leader (after leader!) disqualifies himself through sexual misconduct, all the while the name of Christ is slandered. Lest we focus on only Evangelical leaders though, sexual misconduct, including rampant use of porn, is very much present within the laity of the church.<\/p>\n
Researchers have shown the phenomena physically alters the structure of our brains<\/a>. We even know desensitization occurs<\/a>, as warped views of human sexuality increase in order to even experience sexual gratification. Furthermore, we are fully aware of the correlation<\/a> between sex trafficking<\/a> and the multi-billion dollar porn industry<\/a>. We are also startlingly aware of the correlation between viewing pornography and committing sex-crimes<\/a>. It also isn\u2019t shocking to find that an individual engaging in private infidelity through porn is more likely<\/a> to carry out the physical expression if given the opportunity, even though both result in an\u00a0increased likelihood of divorce<\/a>.<\/p>\n One might be tempted to look at these things from a purely clinical perspective, but Scriptural precedent clearly establishes a direct correlation between all forms of sexual perversion and a hatred of God and our fellow man. Yet Evangelical Christians are still participating in these deeds of darkness without much forethought to the long-term consequences. Here we stand, at the precipice of cultural, sexual anarchy, enjoying the same titillating nonsense this world so eagerly digests. What is dumbfounding to me is how we continue to see Evangelical leaders fall after allegations of sexual misconduct \u2013 yet we fail to draw the proper correlation back to the epidemic that is sexual immorality. Why? We hedge our definitions.<\/p>\n I vividly remember the first time I was exposed to pornography as a child. I was seven years old. Seven<\/em>. These were the days of latchkey children; both parents would be working whilst their children exercised dominion over their neighborhoods. Long summer days were filled with bike-riding, scratch games of street hockey or baseball, and the regular mischief any child gets into when they have hours of free time before mom and dad come home.<\/p>\n On one such day my neighbor\u2019s children easily conned me into riding our bikes past the highway \u2013 something we were all strictly forbidden of. We made our way past the busy road, closing our eyes as we darted across lanes of traffic with \u201cno handlebars\u201d, and found the familiar trails we had worn bare. This time though, we took a new path, one my friends assured me would lead us to stumble upon something cool when we \u201cgot there\u201d.<\/p>\n We rode for about ten minutes until we reached a small clearing the new path had taken us to. While there were many amenities for the homeless man who made this patch of grass his abode, the three I remember are the Penthouse magazine, a liter of gin, and a pack of smokes. All three of us partook in the spoils of our find \u2013 and incidentally enough, those three items which rocked our adolescence provided the fodder for a plethora of pitfalls. I was seven years old. Seven.<\/em><\/p>\n My son, if sinners entice you, do not yield to them (Proverbs 1:10).<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n While there are many object lessons bound within my own story \u2013 parents would do well not to base decisions upon fear, but rather, act with prudential foresight into the very real, ever-present devastation that sin brings. My experience was 24 years ago. I am a man now equipped to deal with the baggage and weight of sin, but then I was not. I had no clue what I was getting myself into, nor did I recognize the consequences of this folly would be so long-lasting.<\/p>\n I did not have a father who trained me in Scripture and pleaded with me to avoid sexual sin. I grew up in a home that glorified sexual exploits at a young age (my father was an unbeliever until my early 20\u2019s). Thus, when I entered middle school and heard the tales of my father\u2019s youthful indiscretions, my pre-pubescent awkwardness was at its height. I was not confident. I was not able to attract women in that manner. Of course, I didn\u2019t quite understand, beyond a vague notion of \u201csaving yourself for the one you love\u201d, that this was completely unhealthy for a twelve year-old, let alone a warped view of sexuality as it were.<\/p>\n But, I had my old standby. Porn, though hard to come by at first, was an easy outlet for my bumbling misunderstanding of sexuality. Even though I had to be sneaky because there was this sense of privatized shame attached to it, the explosion of the internet made it easy for kids. We were learning how to use it at the same time as our parents and teachers \u2013 and we were quicker students. We could already navigate past firewalls and security filters; we could clear our browser history; we could fool adults into thinking there was nothing sketchy about our internet usage.<\/p>\n Quite the opposite was true though. This was a time when the internet was still relatively new \u2013 so even if you didn\u2019t know these work-arounds, you could type in a given number of innocuous keywords that would bring up pornography as you were researching for a school paper. Anyone who grew up during this timeframe knows what I speak of. Natural curiosity implanted a sense of easy mischief, one we could feign innocence in if we got caught by the librarian simply because even when you weren\u2019t looking for porn it turned up<\/em>.<\/p>\n I bring this foray into my personal history up because I don\u2019t sense my experience to be all that unique. Sure \u2013 perhaps few were introduced to a Penthouse magazine when they were seven, but those in my age group surely found themselves introduced to porn much earlier than anyone would have imagined. Yet it would be absolute folly to imagine this problem was relegated to my youth and does not affect younger (and older) generations \u2013 especially as the statistics show quite the contrary.<\/p>\n While not fully up-to-date, Pornhub\u2019s 2017 Year in Review[1]<\/a> has shown the website catered to some 28.5 billion visitors. In terms of SEO count, that\u2019s 81 million unique visitors per day. They further boasted of 24.7 billion searches in the year, which they say translates to about 50,000 searches per minute, or 800 searches per second. If that\u2019s not easy enough to compute \u2013 they break it down a bit more practically for readers. Incidentally, that\u2019s the same number of burgers that McDonalds sells every second.<\/p>\n In one year, the hours of porn uploaded to the site translated into 68 years if watched non-stop. The staggering amount of data being used to stream the website\u2019s data was 118 GB per second \u2013 something the article boasts is enough to fill the storage of all the world\u2019s iPhones. Put another way: in just five minutes, Pornhub\u2019s servers transmits more data than the entire contents of the New York Public Library\u2019s 50 million books.<\/p>\n While the data is limited \u2013 it doesn\u2019t compare any statistical data of underage users\u00a0\u2013 it does clearly show the majority of users are those aged 18-34 (61%). And if you think this is just a young male\u2019s problem \u2013 you are surely mistaken. The average proportion of women world-wide is approximately 26%, showing a steady increase from year to year in every country (save Russia). Given the rapidly increasing figures, it shouldn\u2019t be terribly long before men and women are on equal footing. Remember, these figures are from just one<\/em> porn website.<\/p>\n Then we can take the results of Barna\u2019s 2016 study<\/a>, which shows people do not define pornography in clear-cut terms. Rather, they define porn on the basis of the function it serves; if it is meant for arousal, its porn. Thus, most would define pornography outside of the bounds of things meant for entertainment purposes, even if the sexual depictions were graphic in nature. Keeping this in mind, the poll revealed 21% of youth pastors and 14% of pastors admit they currently<\/strong> struggle with pornography. Furthermore, teens and young adults overwhelmingly speak of pornography in neutral, accepting, or encouraging ways. Only 1 in 20 young adults, and 1 in 10 teens, believed viewing pornography was morally wrong.<\/p>\n Even more recently, we find Gallup\u2019s study<\/a> revealing the current social acceptance of pornography has grown 7% from last year, with 43% of people believing it is morally acceptable. While the isolated statistics are fascinating in and of themselves in showing the steady growth of acceptance in nearly every category, the alarming trend for religious individuals has also seen an increase. 22% of those holding that religion is very important to them believe pornography is morally acceptable, followed by 50% for those who say religion is moderately important, and 76% percent of those who say religion is not very important to them at all.<\/p>\n While those outside of organized religion are at higher rates of acceptance, nearly 1 in 4 who claim religion is highly important to them still view pornography as morally acceptable. This is with a loose definition of porn that doesn\u2019t see nudity as anything pornographic \u2013 so in terms of sexually immoral content as defined by Scripture (Gal. 5:19), those statistics, staggering as they are, still do not accurately reflect the problem amongst Christians. By that criteria alone \u2013 and especially in terms of the current reader who claims Christ whilst dismissing the last two sentences, we\u2019ve already lost the battle.<\/p>\n We easily justify ingesting pornographic expressions in popular culture because it isn\u2019t as racy as the hardcore porn we have to go and find at the click of a mouse. We ogle those whom we\u2019d be ashamed of if they were our daughters and praise that in ourselves which we would be ashamed of in our sons. We seek to find the proverbial line, which we utterly bind in subjectivity, and toe it \u2013 occasionally slipping over to the wrong side from time to time. We feel the shame connected to that, yet are perplexed at why we can\u2019t quite be free from the bondage of sexual sin.<\/p>\n I am convinced that many don\u2019t commit adulterous affairs \u2013 not out of a love for God \u2013 but because they wouldn\u2019t know how to carry one out without getting caught or they simply just don\u2019t have the opportunity provided to them. If this weren\u2019t true, it seems that pornography wouldn\u2019t be such a huge issue within the church for men and women. Porn offers a similar experience without the inherent risks of that physical expression \u2013 yet interestingly, the stats demonstrate those with a porn addiction are more than twice as likely to seek out that physical expression. The point being, porn is as much of a pit of death that Solomon warns of as the one enticing you into their bedroom; they lead to the same place.<\/p>\n Incidentally, Solomon also describes this same individual as brutish and utterly senseless. The adverb he uses in Proverbs 7:22 describes his sudden interest in the harlot as that which we would describe idiomatically as \u201cin the blink of an eye\u201d. He has no second thoughts about his actions, but is impulse-driven, like cattle led to slaughter, or the foolish criminal who simply goes from shackle to shackle. The harlot is so enticing to him that he literally shows no hesitation as he goes to his own destruction.<\/p>\n When we deny a metaphysics of personhood the sole enterprise becomes one in which men and women seek pleasure. In essence, pleasure is the vehicle through which people have come to identify themselves. Any form of human expression outside of human sexuality (i.e. the sexually chaste) is seen as un-whole. It is the fundamental degradation of humanity itself as it debases that which is unique in all humans (the Imago Dei) in favor of that which makes us similar to all other mammals: sex.<\/p>\n Women are viewed as the sole objects of pleasure, and they are encouraged in the midst of a #MeToo era to explore sexual fetishes<\/a> that perpetuate the misogyny they rally against. Men are in a perpetual state of adolescence wherein they seek sexual expression without the risks of human interaction and the messiness of relationships. Behind each of these distortions of sexuality is the faulty notion that in some capacity, sexuality is intrinsically linked to what confers personhood<\/a>.<\/p>\n This is not merely a moral crisis \u2013 it is an existential crisis, namely, because people have removed any purpose to sexuality other than pleasure. If we sense pornography does not facilitate this with abundant ease, we are na\u00efve at best. If we sense the church has not bought into this lie, well, the statistic show otherwise. The experience of young men and women struggling with porn in our churches demonstrates otherwise. The percentage of pastors who are being ousted due to sexual misconduct also demolishes this notion. The amount of ministry leaders keeping their sin private, if the above statistics are even accurate, also exhibit the contrary.<\/p>\n We live in a culture that consumes pornography at the same rate as hamburgers \u2013 and we don\u2019t see that as an absolutely terrifying<\/em> trend. We don\u2019t see the correlation between rampant sexual misconduct and the liberalization of the church \u2013 and the increased acceptance of sexual immorality behind her doors. We don\u2019t see these things because we don\u2019t properly understand humanity in terms of relation to God, but instead, we see it in terms of sexuality. Thereby, people adopt an ethic of harm or purpose when it comes to deriving meaning and understanding of sexuality, yet neither of these will do enough.<\/p>\n No, we must understand sexuality in terms of ontology \u2013 that is, how we relate to God, rather than mere, moral aesthetics. Any consumption of pornography within the churched simply demonstrates how low a view of God, truth, and virtue we possess, yet how high a view of man we maintain as we\u00a0cling to our sin<\/a>. It is no small wonder we see such strong ties to sexually immoral behavior and idolatry within the Scriptures. May God have mercy on us \u2013 for though we don\u2019t see it, the Evangelical church is in existential crisis as she relates to human sexuality and flourishing. The canary in the coal mine is dead.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\nA Personal Excursus<\/h4>\n
General Statistics<\/h4>\n
Pornography: Not Simply a Crisis for the Unbeliever<\/h4>\n
Porn: Not simply a Moral Crisis \u2013 But an Existential One<\/h4>\n