Editor\u2019s Note: You will most likely not want to read this until you\u2019ve seen the film. You have seen the film\u2026 right?<\/em><\/p>\n The introduction to Pixar\u2019s newest film, \u201cUp,\u201d is utterly shocking. While some of us went in expecting something \u201ccute,\u201d wanting to be distracted from the typical trials of everyday life, and perhaps wanting our sons and daughters to be shielded from them, others of us went in expecting to have to make an extra effort to suspend our disbelief, with the understanding that this was a movie primarily about making a house fly.<\/p>\n What we got instead was an opportunity to approach real life in a way that was utterly realistic and at the same time utterly hopeful. What we found was that this film was not <\/strong>really<\/strong><\/em> about a flying house at all.<\/strong><\/p>\n Entertainment culture is dominated these days by two lenses through which to look at life: Cynicism and Naivete. Offerings such as The Daily Show, Late Night television, Angels and Demons, Green Day\u2019s 21st Century Breakdown all present a highly suspicious look at the world. They submit to the audience the suggestion that those who are supposed to be looking out for us are actually looking out for themselves. Even worse, they tend to suggest that all of life is hopeless and only useful as a means of comedy. We laugh so that we do not cry.<\/p>\n On the other hand, previous Disney films, romantic comedies, and the more current and specific \u201cNight at the Museum 2\u201d \u00a0all view the world with an absolute certainty that the glass is indeed half full. Often, conflict exists only for a short time, and only to be overcome totally and absolutely by the end of the program. They suggest that while life may not be easy, it is in fact \u201csimple.\u201d Evil is clearly marked as evil and good is either easily identified or simply summed up as \u201cfollowing your heart.\u201d<\/p>\n In fact, adherants to both of these viewpoints, cynicism and naivete, suffer from a lack of complexity in the way they view life<\/strong>. In an effort to make sense of life, they distort it so that it fits into their own warped perspective. Reality isn\u2019t quite ignored, but it is carefully spun.<\/p>\n We are these adherants. We all suffer with a displeasure and discontentment with reality as it is. The cynic in us interprets that which doesn\u2019t go according to plan as a purely negative development. The naive in us refuses to acknowledge that our man-made plans may in fact be flawed. This is a disease none of us is immune from, and it becomes particularly pointed when Christians begin applying it to our belief about God and the way He works in the world and our lives.<\/p>\n This is why \u201cUp\u201d is such a special film. It takes both cynicism and naivete head on, and as a result rings completely and utterly true. Carl Frederickson, the archetypal old cynical man finds a friend in Russell, a classic naive Wilderness Scout. They both find that dreams don\u2019t always come easy and aren\u2019t always achievable, that people aren\u2019t always easily pegged as mean or annoying. Most importantly, they learn not only that hardships, tragedies and struggles are a regular and consistent part of life, but that they are opportunity for growth, surprise, and moments of pure grace.<\/p>\n By the end of the film, you realize, along with the characters, just how much more rich their lives are as a result of their dreams and hopes previously being crushed, not just once, but over and over by divorce, a tree, bad health, death, a disappointing role-model, and geographical distance.<\/p>\n No, the story isn\u2019t really about a flying house at all. That would be too simple, and if that was what it was about, the ending would have been very sad indeed. Of course the cynic would delight in such an ending. After all, that\u2019s what life is really like sometimes, right? The naive would hate such an ending, preferring the old man get to where he always wanted to go.<\/p>\n Neither of those endings would satisfy me, because the story\u2019s about much more than whether or not that house gets where Carl wants it to go. It\u2019s about two characters whose lives were changed for the better\u2026 just after they were changed for the worse. That\u2019s grace, and that\u2019s beautiful.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" How Pixar’s new film destroyed cynicism and defied the naive. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1206,"featured_media":3741,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7,8,11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured","category-film","category-headline"],"yoast_head":"\n