Note to Sorkin: We know what you are doing. You think if you create a Christian character, and make her cute and smart, that you are then covered to say every nasty rotten, bigotted thing you want about Christians.<\/p>\n
It doesn\u2019t. You can\u2019t.<\/p>\n
For the record, we know what you\u2019re doing. It\u2019s called\u2026 <\/p>\n
..to?ken?ism? \/?to?k??n?z?m\/ Pronunciation[toh-kuh-niz-uhm] \u2013noun
1. the practice or policy of making no more than a token effort or gesture, as in offering opportunities to minorities equal to those of the majority.
2. any legislation, admissions policy, hiring practice, etc., that demonstrates only minimal compliance with rules, laws, or public pressure: Admitting one woman to the men\u2019s club was merely tokenism.<\/p>\n
Bigotted people do tokenism to cover their asses from charges of being bigotted. Just to say.<\/p>\n
And I\u2019d get really mad about it, except that I think the audience is going to reject Studio 60<\/em> as just more really lame exercise in Hollywood narcissim. <\/p>\n So, getting mad about the intolerance of \u201ccrazy Christians\u201d would be swinging at a pitch in the dirt.<\/p>\n So, we\u2019ll just pray for you instead. On some level, it\u2019s fascinating how much we Christians are getting to you.<\/p>\n P.S. Some folks are claiming thatthe writing in Studio 60<\/em> was remarkably stellarly fantastic the amazing like of which we have never seen before. Yawn. So not true. And here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n Bad writing is a writer telling the audience how to feel. In last night\u2019s episode, we were supposed to believe that an episode of a SNL clone show that pilloried Christians was somehow brave and daring. See, that\u2019s where the writing tripped up. We were being told that savaging Christians for laughs was a rare act of courage, spitting in the eye of the cowering network establishment that dwells in mind-numbing terror of the awesomely powerful group which will foreverafter be known as CHR_STIANS(!) for fear of saying the complete name and bringing down their all-consuming wrath. <\/p>\n In fact, savaging Chr_stians on everything from SNL<\/em> to Law and Order<\/em> to the Brooklyn Museum of Art has become commonplace and . So, the show was telling us that a character was being brave, when in fact, he was being trite. This is the definition of bad writing.<\/p>\n If Sorkin et al. really<\/em> wanted to brave it would have been easily achieved. Have the controversial skit be called, \u201cCrazy Violent Religion of Peace!\u201d or \u201cMelancholic Rich Secular Jews!\u201d or \u201cNutty Inconsistent Liberals\u201d. See, that would have been brave. And shocking.<\/p>\n The joke is, pillorying Chr_stians in this particular moment of history is as close to ostrich head in the sand syndrome as could be imagined. Yeah, let\u2019s all rip the Chr_stians for imagined attacks on free speech while the Mulims are coming at us hurling amonium nitrate and literally taking away your right to life. The Chr_stians you hate will certainly be the ones dying to save you.<\/p>\n Sheesh.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Note to Sorkin: We know what you are doing. You think if you create a Christian character, and make her cute and smart, that you are then covered to say every nasty rotten, bigotted thing you want about Christians. It doesn\u2019t. You can\u2019t. For the record, we know what you\u2019re doing. It\u2019s called\u2026 ..to?ken?ism? \/?to?k??n?z?m\/ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1121,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n