Just in case someone missed the media blitz over the last month or so.\u00a0 You always know when you begin seeing stories about the shoes this actor wears, or who that actress is dating, that a movie is on the horizon.\u00a0 From the beginning, the MSM has loved Potter, and has been one of the chief promoters of its empire.\u00a0 Why, I don\u2019t know.\u00a0 Popular culture is everything nowadays.\u00a0 But the fact that so much of our modern media loves the franchise suggests it probably isn\u2019t because Harry Potter is jot and tittle a rewording of the Christian gospel, despite what some Christian Potter fans would like to believe.\u00a0 <\/p>\n
In fact, one of the weirdest phenomenons in the whole story of Potterville has been the backlash against religious fundamentalists that has been almost as, well, radical as the original fundamentalist reaction to the books.\u00a0 While the usual suspects came out at the beginning and labeled Harry Potter as the textbook of Satan, a stalwart bunch of Christian fans of the series fired back.\u00a0 Not only was it not of the Devil, but soon it became a reflection of the Eternal Truth, where every page and paragraph oozed Christian Gospel.\u00a0 More than that, some (oddly enough in the blogosphere) went so far as to suggest only idiots or those whose spiritual being was somehow deficient could ever miss the fact that the Potter Saga deserved to be placed somewhere between Matthew and John.<\/p>\n
Perhaps it\u2019s just me, and maybe because I haven\u2019t read all seven of the books, but from what folks have said, what Rowling has said, and the general response to the books has suggested, I must be dumb or spiritually inept.\u00a0 For I don\u2019t see a series of books written by a sage scholar of the deepest insights trying to promote the orthodox Christian faith.\u00a0 I see a woman who, as my oldest boy has said in so many words, is a decent author but a phenomenally brilliant and capable business woman.\u00a0 One of her greatest gifts (powers should we say) is the ability to speak to a diverse range of fans and convince them that she is writing for them.\u00a0 She\u2019s not dead.\u00a0 She didn\u2019t pass from this world a hundred years ago, where debates about her intentions and themes are the stuff of academic theory.\u00a0 She\u2019s alive in the Internet age.\u00a0 And yet she still maintains groups of fans who insist she speaks to them, that her books are a celebration of post-modern new age occultism, or a validation of European secular liberal values, or a tome laying down the framework of the traditional Christian faith for a new generation.\u00a0 All insist they are right because she is more brilliant than a Washington politician when it comes to saying just enough, but never more. <\/p>\n
I have my own opinions, of course.\u00a0 And it\u2019s not because I have anything against the books.\u00a0 I think they are cute; the early ones especially are nice children\u2019s books.\u00a0 Prisoner<\/em> is my favorite, and I think the best of the series.\u00a0 The later ones perhaps had her\u00a0overreaching her writing abilities.\u00a0\u00a0But overall they appear\u00a0rather inoffensive, and have a\u00a0few nice lessons like self sacrifice and loyalty.\u00a0 There are also a few lessons not so nice, particularly the idea that authority is always to be resisted and when you\u2019re the good guy, there\u2019s no rules, just right.\u00a0 <\/p>\n As for why the change in style and, to be blunt, quality?\u00a0 Some of the confusion could be, like my oldest (and our resident expert on the Potter books) said, her books appear to have two distinct phases.\u00a0 The early ones, when she was just beginning, appear to be part of an overall storyline that she was developing that find its crescendo in the third book, Prisoner of Azkaban.<\/em>\u00a0 Somewhere between book four (Goblet of Fire<\/em>) and book five (Order of the Phoenix<\/em>), things change.\u00a0 Many fans, and critics, argue the books loose a little there, are not as well written, and generally try to go too many directions at once.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n Why?\u00a0 My guess is, and at least one theory I read suggests, she realized a major change had to happen.\u00a0 The first books give every impression that Harry was the tragic hero, doomed to die or suffer some Frodo-like fate to save the world.\u00a0 But as HP became the first fruits of the new era of international market access, a development that has opened the door to unprecedented success for such stellar works as the Twilight<\/em> series and Avatar<\/em>, it became clear a major change had to take place.\u00a0 Harry could never, ever die.\u00a0 No way.\u00a0 There is a multi-billion dollar international Potter Corp. to consider.\u00a0 Get rid of Harry, and it\u2019s all over.\u00a0 My other boys attest that while still somewhat popular, Harry Potter has been eclipsed by other works over the last year or so. Harry had to live, to go on, for multi-billion dollar corporations must be maintained. <\/p>\n Yet even a cursory reading of the early books suggests Harry was being set up as the great, tragic hero, something Rowling herself hinted at many times in early interviews.\u00a0 So when it became clear that killing off Harry would have been like killing off Mickey Mouse, changes had to happen.\u00a0 Other characters had to be elevated so that when the time came, and the promised final<\/em> book was released, the \u2018tragedy\u2019 would still happen \u2013 in that key figures who had become major players could still be offed in order to fulfill the requisite \u2018this is an unusually tragic tale for a kid\u2019s book\u2019 \u2013 while keeping the principles alive for that magical day when Rowling could forget her lifelong promise (that there would only and ever be seven Potter books), and begin laying the groundwork for more At least that\u2019s my guess.\u00a0 All of this is to say be careful how one plows into the modern artificial world of popular culture.\u00a0 If corporate heads and politicians are merely corporate heads and politicians, that may sometimes apply even to those whose products we admire.\u00a0 Sure, for those who looked at Harry Potter and said it\u2019s of the Devil, unless you can prove it beyond \u2018it has wizards doesn\u2019t it?\u2019, consider backing off and not making the Christian faith look stupid.\u00a0 But for those who attempted to elevate it to the level of St. Rowling and the Holy Potter, consider that she simply might be a decent author who is a\u00a0brilliant business woman, promoting a mixture of\u00a0classical themes that Christianity certainly can claim, but also infusing it with plenty of European post-modern notions of individualism, anti-authority, and affirmation of anyone for any reason who does anything as long as they are not a baddie.\u00a0 And when the magic dust has finally settled, its main purpose may have been\u00a0focused on maintaining yet one more multi-billion dollar corporation above all things.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Just in case someone missed the media blitz over the last month or so.\u00a0 You always know when you begin seeing stories about the shoes this actor wears, or who that actress is dating, that a movie is on the horizon.\u00a0 From the beginning, the MSM has loved Potter, and has been one of the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2805,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nreturns for the stockholders<\/strike> books for her loyal fans. <\/p>\n