{"id":61766,"date":"2018-06-07T20:09:47","date_gmt":"2018-06-08T02:09:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?p=61766"},"modified":"2018-09-05T09:53:35","modified_gmt":"2018-09-05T15:53:35","slug":"more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html","title":{"rendered":"More on the &#8220;Masterpiece Cakeshop&#8221; Case"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_39516\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-39516\" style=\"width: 597px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/186\/2017\/01\/800px-SupremeCourt3.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-39516\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/186\/2017\/01\/800px-SupremeCourt3.jpg\" alt=\"SCOTUS bldg. DC USA\" width=\"597\" height=\"401\"><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-39516\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The United States Supreme Court building \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0(Wikimedia Commons public domain)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court\u2019s controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0<i>Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission:<\/i><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/a-victory-for-religious-liberty-and-for-liberty-in-general.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cA victory for religious liberty, and for liberty in general\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Here, now, is a follow-up to that entry:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>First, I\u2019m grateful to Michael Schroth for bringing the following piece to my attention. \u00a0It\u2019s by the distinguished jurist and Stanford law school professor Michael McConnell, whom I was once privileged to co-host for a small event many years ago when he was teaching at the University of Utah. \u00a0(He is not, by the way, a Latter-day Saint, and never has been.) \u00a0In my judgment this is a very clearly-written and persuasive little essay, and I hope that all of the readers here who are interested in the recent Supreme Court case will give it careful attention. \u00a0It was written back in March, nearly three months before SCOTUS issued its ruling:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/reason.com\/volokh\/2018\/03\/06\/dressmakers-bakers-and-the-equality-of-r\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cDressmakers, Bakers, and the Equality of Rights\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The great George Will responds to the ruling in <em>National Review<\/em>:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2018\/06\/masterpiece-cakeshop-supreme-court-decision-free-speech-temporary-respite\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cSCOTUS Gives Free-Speech Advocates Temporary Respite in\u00a0<em>Masterpiece Cakeshop\u201d<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Writing in <em>First Things<\/em>, Professor Darel Paul shares Wills\u2019s sense that the decision represents less of a victory than many defenders of religious freedom and the First Amendment had hoped for and, at the first, thought that they had been given:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.firstthings.com\/web-exclusives\/2018\/06\/no-victory-for-religious-liberty\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cNo Victory for Religious Liberty\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Andrew McCarthy, writing in <em>National Review<\/em>, is even more pessimistic about the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/2018\/06\/masterpiece-cakeshop-setback-liberty\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201c<i>Masterpiece Cakeshop<\/i>\u00a0Is a Setback for Liberty\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>Christianity Today<\/em> provides a helpfully varied (but supportive) commentary on the ruling that includes passing incidental mention of the LDS Church:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianitytoday.com\/news\/2018\/june\/supreme-court-masterpiece-cakeshop-same-sex-weddings.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cWill Supreme Court Cake Ruling Actually Help Christian Businesses?\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop case tests religious and LGBT rights, but justices choose the narrow way.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Some will be interested in this:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dissent-supreme-court-wedding-cake-shop-case_us_5b15ce75e4b0129b529d3a12\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cThe Key Part Of RBG\u2019s Dissent In The Supreme Court \u2018Cakeshop\u2019 Case: \u00a0\u201cI strongly disagree\u2026 with the Court\u2019s conclusion that Craig and Mullins should lose this case,\u201d Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg wrote.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The <a href='https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/library\/mormonism' target='_blank'>Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints<\/a> issued an official response to the SCOTUS decision on the day that it was announced:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.deseretnews.com\/article\/900020551\/lds-church-responds-to-supreme-court-ruling-about-baker-same-sex-wedding-case.html?utm_source=Mormon+Times&amp;utm_campaign=8ecbca4af0-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_06_06_10_24&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_c5601155fb-8ecbca4af0-510700241\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cLDS Church responds to Supreme Court ruling about baker, same-sex wedding case\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><span style=\"color: #993300;\">***<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #993300;\"><strong>\u201cI have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.\u201d<\/strong> \u00a0(Thomas\u00a0Jefferson to Benjamin Rush, 23 September 1800, in <em>Papers of Thomas Jefferson<\/em>\u00a032:168)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\">Posted from Richmond, Virginia<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0 \u00a0 I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court\u2019s controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission: \u00a0 \u201cA victory for religious liberty, and for liberty in general\u201d \u00a0 Here, now, is a follow-up to that entry: \u00a0 First, I\u2019m grateful to Michael [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1019,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61766","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>More on the &quot;Masterpiece Cakeshop&quot; Case<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court&#039;s controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"More on the &quot;Masterpiece Cakeshop&quot; Case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court&#039;s controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sic et Non\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-08T02:09:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-05T15:53:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/files\/2017\/01\/800px-SupremeCourt3.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html\",\"name\":\"More on the \\\"Masterpiece Cakeshop\\\" Case\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-08T02:09:47+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-05T15:53:35+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\"},\"description\":\"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court's controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"More on the &#8220;Masterpiece Cakeshop&#8221; Case\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/\",\"name\":\"Sic et Non\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\",\"name\":\"Dan Peterson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dan Peterson\"},\"description\":\"\\\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\\\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"More on the \"Masterpiece Cakeshop\" Case","description":"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court's controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"More on the \"Masterpiece Cakeshop\" Case","og_description":"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court's controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html","og_site_name":"Sic et Non","article_published_time":"2018-06-08T02:09:47+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-05T15:53:35+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/files\/2017\/01\/800px-SupremeCourt3.jpg"}],"author":"Dan Peterson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dan Peterson","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html","name":"More on the \"Masterpiece Cakeshop\" Case","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-08T02:09:47+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-05T15:53:35+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045"},"description":"&nbsp; &nbsp; I posted an entry the other day about the United States Supreme Court's controversial 4 June decision in the case of\u00a0Masterpiece Cakeshop v.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/06\/more-on-the-masterpiece-cakeshop-case.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"More on the &#8220;Masterpiece Cakeshop&#8221; Case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/","name":"Sic et Non","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045","name":"Dan Peterson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dan Peterson"},"description":"\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61766","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1019"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61766"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61766\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61766"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61766"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61766"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}