{"id":63277,"date":"2018-07-25T10:58:27","date_gmt":"2018-07-25T16:58:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?p=63277"},"modified":"2018-09-05T09:52:57","modified_gmt":"2018-09-05T15:52:57","slug":"the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html","title":{"rendered":"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"BC's<\/a>
Victoria, British Columbia, by night \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the Middle Ages and only began to flourish again when theology was dethroned in the Renaissance, thus restoring freedom of thought. \u00a0(The insinuation is that religion has always been an obstacle to science, and that, even today, if religion were to disappear, scientific progress would accelerate.)<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

James Hannam\u2019s\u00a0The Genesis of Science: How the Christian Middle Ages Launched the Scientific Revolution<\/em>\u00a0(Washington DC: Henry Regnery, 2011) argues that this picture of medieval and Renaissance science is simplistic and distorted, if not altogether false. \u00a0Here\u2019s a passage from the book:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

To add insult to injury, historians have long assumed that the frequent attacks on Aristotelians in the sixteenth and seventeenth century were aimed at the obduracy of medieval natural philosophy. \u00a0For instance, Galileo tells the following story in his Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems<\/em> (1632) . . . \u00a0To understand the story, it is necessary to know that Aristotle believed that the nervous system centered on the heart and not the brain. \u00a0\u201cOne day,\u201d Galileo tells us, speaking through a character in the dialogue, \u201cI was at the home of a very famous doctor in Venice.\u201d \u00a0While he was there, the doctor was carrying out an anatomical dissection. \u00a0Galileo continues:<\/span><\/p>\n

He happened to be investigating the source and origin of the nerves. \u00a0The anatomist showed the great bundle of nerves leaving the brain and passing through the neck, extending down the spine and branching out through the whole body. \u00a0Only a single strand as fine as a thread arrived at the heart. \u00a0The anatomist has been exhibiting and demonstrating everything with unusual care because he knew one of those present was a follower of Aristotle. \u00a0Turning to him, the anatomist asked whether he was finally satisfied that nerves originated in the brain and not the heart. \u00a0The Aristotelian thought for a while before he said, \u201cYou have shown me this so clearly that I would be forced to admit that you were right, if only Aristotle himself did not contradict you.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

Generations of historians believed that this story and Montaigne\u2019s anecdote [dcp: see my previous entry in this series] were aimed at the natural philosophers of the Middle Ages. \u00a0Only recently has it become apparent that their targets were one-eyed Aristotelian humanists who had completely lost the medieval critical attitude towards the Philosopher. \u00a0(217)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now this<\/em> is interesting:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cEvidence detected of lake beneath the surface of Mars\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

And here\u2019s a (slightly) related piece from elsewhere in the solar system:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cProbing the mystery of Pluto\u2019s glaciers: Glaciers seen on the dwarf planet appear to violate physics, prompting a search for explanation.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Incidentally, according to exhibits in the Royal British Columbia Museum, which we visited a couple of days ago, views of Vancouver Island in the last ice age have been undergoing fairly radical revision lately. \u00a0It seems that the island wasn\u2019t entirely under ice, but that flora and fauna were flourishing in certain areas. \u00a0Here\u2019s a journalistic discussion of the subject:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cA mammoth shift in thinking on Vancouver Island\u2019s Ice Age history\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Posted from Victoria, British Columbia<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0 A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the Middle Ages and only began to flourish again when theology was dethroned in the Renaissance, thus restoring freedom of thought. \u00a0(The insinuation is that religion has always been an obstacle […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1019,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sic et Non\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-07-25T16:58:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-05T15:52:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/files\/2018\/07\/Victoria_BC_-_harbor_at_night_01_20232280449.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html\",\"name\":\"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-07-25T16:58:27+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-05T15:52:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\"},\"description\":\"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/\",\"name\":\"Sic et Non\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\",\"name\":\"Dan Peterson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dan Peterson\"},\"description\":\"\\\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\\\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)","description":"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)","og_description":"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html","og_site_name":"Sic et Non","article_published_time":"2018-07-25T16:58:27+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-05T15:52:57+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/files\/2018\/07\/Victoria_BC_-_harbor_at_night_01_20232280449.jpg"}],"author":"Dan Peterson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dan Peterson","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html","name":"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-07-25T16:58:27+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-05T15:52:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045"},"description":"    A recurring trope among critics of religious belief is the claim that scientific inquiry was stifled by the Roman Catholic Church during the","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2018\/07\/the-reactionary-renaissance-part-b.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Reactionary Renaissance (Part B)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/","name":"Sic et Non","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045","name":"Dan Peterson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dan Peterson"},"description":"\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1019"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63277"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63277\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}