{"id":70516,"date":"2019-02-16T19:01:39","date_gmt":"2019-02-17T02:01:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?p=70516"},"modified":"2019-02-16T20:09:33","modified_gmt":"2019-02-17T03:09:33","slug":"is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html","title":{"rendered":"“Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Where<\/a>
A 2013 photograph of the United States Supreme Court building, taken from the dome of the U.S. Capitol in Washington DC \u00a0 \u00a0(Wikimedia Commons public domain image)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

I\u2019m happy \u2014 to put it mildly \u2014 that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that conservative majority will grow. \u00a0In a recent case, though, I believe that the conservative majority ruled incorrectly and I find myself agreeing with Justice Elena Kagan in dissent:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

New York Times<\/em>: \u00a0\u201cIs Religious Freedom for Christians Only? \u00a0Domineque Hakim Marcelle Ray wanted an imam by his side when he was executed. The Supreme Court said no.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

National Review<\/em>: \u00a0\u201cThe Supreme Court Upholds a Grave Violation of the First Amendment\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Get Religion<\/em>: \u00a0\u201cSolid, if low key, coverage of Muslim inmate executed in Alabama \u2013 without his imam present\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Religious leaders and believers must unite to strengthen our freedom to teach what we have in common, as well as to teach and exercise our very real religious differences. We must walk shoulder to shoulder on the same path in order to secure our freedom to pursue our separate ways when that is necessary according to our distinctive beliefs. We must also insist on our constitutional right to exer-cise our beliefs and to voice our con-sciences on issues in the public square and in the halls of justice. These are the rights of all citizens, including religious believers, leaders, and organizations. \u00a0<\/strong>(Elder Dallin H. Oaks, \u201cStrengthening the Free Exercise of Religion\u201d [Part III], 16 May 2013)<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

This proposal that we unite more effectively does not require any examination of the doctrinal differences among Christians, Jews, and Muslims, or even an identification of the many common elements of our beliefs. All that is necessary for unity and a broad coalition along the lines I am suggesting is a common belief that there is a right and wrong in human behavior that has been established by a Supreme Being. All who believe in that fundamental should unite more effectively to preserve and strengthen the freedom to advocate and practice our religious beliefs, whatever they are. We must walk together for a ways on the same path in order to secure our freedom to pursue our separate ways when that is necessary according to our own beliefs. . . .<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

I am not proposing a resurrection of the so-called \u201cmoral majority,\u201d which was identified with a particular religious group and a particular political party. Nor am I proposing an alliance or identification with any current political movement, tea party or other. I speak for a broader principle, non-partisan and, in its own focused objective, ecumenical.<\/strong> \u00a0(<\/span>Elder Dallin H. Oaks, \u201cPreserving Religious Freedom,\u201d speech given at Chapman University School of Law on 4 February 2011 [Part V])<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t condone what\u00a0Domineque Ray did. \u00a0I also don\u2019t condone what Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) said<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cA Shameful Tolerance\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cDon\u2019t Accept Omar\u2019s Phony Alibis for Hate\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cUnion for Traditional Judaism calls for Omar and King to resign\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

***<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

On a brighter note:<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u201cMeet Sadaf Jaffer, America\u2019s first female Muslim mayor\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Posted from Richmond, Virginia<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0 I\u2019m happy \u2014 to put it mildly \u2014 that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that conservative majority will grow. \u00a0In a recent case, though, I believe that the conservative majority ruled incorrectly and I find myself agreeing with Justice Elena Kagan in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1019,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3286,66,1769,2100,2097,2358],"class_list":["post-70516","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-constitution","tag-islam","tag-muslim","tag-religious-freedom","tag-religious-liberty","tag-supreme-court"],"yoast_head":"\n"Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?"<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Sic et Non\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T02:01:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-17T03:09:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/186\/2015\/04\/2013_U-1.S._Supreme_Court_Building.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dan Peterson\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html\",\"name\":\"\\\"Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?\\\"\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-17T02:01:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-17T03:09:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\"},\"description\":\"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"“Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?”\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/\",\"name\":\"Sic et Non\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045\",\"name\":\"Dan Peterson\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dan Peterson\"},\"description\":\"\\\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\\\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?\"","description":"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?\"","og_description":"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html","og_site_name":"Sic et Non","article_published_time":"2019-02-17T02:01:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-17T03:09:33+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/186\/2015\/04\/2013_U-1.S._Supreme_Court_Building.jpg"}],"author":"Dan Peterson","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dan Peterson","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html","name":"\"Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?\"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-17T02:01:39+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-17T03:09:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045"},"description":"    I'm happy -- to put it mildly -- that the Supreme Court of the United States is now pretty solidly conservative. \u00a0Indeed, I hope that that","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/2019\/02\/is-religious-freedom-for-christians-only.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"“Is Religious Freedom for Christians Only?”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/","name":"Sic et Non","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/77113e9b09701bd1599fa272c4f65045","name":"Dan Peterson","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5ed1a72d26805e35a503e3167599df7c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dan Peterson"},"description":"\"Life was very unsatisfying until I discovered Dan's blog, which gave me a reason to live.\" (gemli, 7 November 2019)","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/author\/danpeterson"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70516","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1019"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70516"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70516\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70516"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70516"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/danpeterson\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70516"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}