{"id":13651,"date":"2017-10-02T13:13:08","date_gmt":"2017-10-02T17:13:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=13651"},"modified":"2017-10-02T13:13:08","modified_gmt":"2017-10-02T17:13:08","slug":"apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html","title":{"rendered":"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"Umpires\"<\/p>\n

(3-5-17)<\/p>\n

*****<\/p>\n

I envision in my head how various people and groups will react to some apologetics analysis of mine, all the time. The problem is, I don\u2019t feel that I can adjust my apologetics analyses according to how they will be received<\/em>. I can do my best in \u201capproach.\u201d I can seek to be as gentle and diplomatic as I can, of course (though, sadly, we all fail again and again on that score).<\/p>\n

But I can\u2019t<\/em> and won\u2019t in fact<\/em> ever please everyone<\/em>, anymore than the apostles and Jesus could please everyone in their time, with the primal Christian message.<\/p>\n

I write in one way to (mostly) fellow Catholics. In that instance, it\u2019s an \u201cin-house\u201d discussion\u201d or \u201ctalking shop.\u201d That includes most of the writing that I do. It\u2019s mainly a Catholic audience, and one that is far more theologically educated than the average.<\/p>\n

But when I\u2019m talking to individuals, I will likely use a completely different tone and emphasis and approach, according to what the other person believes (as much as I can determine that): as I try always to meet people where they are at, according to the Pauline approach, \u201cI have become all things to all men.\u201d<\/p>\n

That said, many times people won\u2019t like what I write and defend. It\u2019s all part of the package of apologetics. Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone. And yes, sometimes they blow calls, too, being fallible humans.<\/p>\n

But the nature of the profession is to always be unpopular with someone<\/em>. They can hardly help that. They gotta call \u2019em as they see \u2019em. It\u2019s part of the package, and no one becomes an umpire, not fully knowing what to expect.<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s what I do as an apologist. Whenever we say \u201cx is a false doctrine\u201d or \u201cy is an immoral practice\u201d or \u201cmarriage is between a man and a woman, as has always been taught by historic Christianity, and the Bible\u201d or \u201cMary is a perpetual virgin\u201d or \u201cthe pope is infallible when he binds the entire Church to a particular dogma\u201d or \u201cProtestantism departed in several (not all) respects from historic Christianity and the apostolic succession\u201d (and a thousand other things that we deal with), then we\u2019re automatically in big trouble with many of the folks who sincerely, honestly believe the things that we are critiquing as false and\/or wrong.<\/p>\n

Thus, apologists are always thought ill of at any given time by good numbers of people with opposing viewpoints, up to and including contempt, and in extreme cases, even hatred. I\u2019ve been blasted or misrepresented; sometimes literally slandered and lied about, almost literally every week since I began my website and active presence online, in 1997.<\/p>\n

I\u2019m not talking about legitimate constructive criticism, which I always welcome and greatly appreciate, but unfair, unjust nonsense, where people either know nothing at all about me (and make no attempt to learn what I actually believe) or are operating on stale stereotypes and caricatures.<\/p>\n

Jesus said we should expect to be hated by the world, as I recently wrote about<\/a> in one of my \u201cofficial\u201d columns. This is no big surprise. But sometimes, some people imply that being an apologist is, or should be, a popularity contest, or merely a touchy-feely exercise. It\u2019s usually not.<\/p>\n

The motivation and nature of apologetics is to help people, and to encourage them and build up their faith, and the ones who agree or are persuaded certainly appreciate our efforts. It actually is a service profession, like all teaching functions are.<\/p>\n

But the ones on the other side . . . well, that\u2019s an entirely different story. Every time we make a \u201ccall\u201d: like the umpire, someone out there is very unhappy about it. I have no essential problem with that. I can take it. I\u2019ve understood that this is part of the package of apologetics (have for 35 years). I\u2019m not complaining.<\/p>\n

What I\u2019m doing presently is explaining for the sake of those who don\u2019t seem to understand this. They see me or some other apologist catching hell form here or there, or from the usual suspects, or have heard some terrible, ludicrous thing about us or me, and they immediately conclude it\u2019s our fault, or that we must have something seriously wrong with us. That doesn\u2019t follow at all.<\/p>\n

Sometimes<\/em>\u00a0it is (where we failed and did badly in some way), but usually not. It\u2019s the message that will offend many people: just as St. Paul taught that the message of the cross was a stumbling-block to the Jews and sheer foolishness to the Greeks, and just as they tried to kill Paul and Jesus many times, and eventually succeeded in murdering both of them.<\/p>\n

Nothing has changed since then!<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n

Photo credit:<\/strong> Arguing with the umpires, by \u201cmark6mauno\u201d (8-29-09)<\/span> [Flickr<\/a> \/ CC BY 2.0<\/a> license]<\/p>\n

***<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(3-5-17) ***** I envision in my head how various people and groups will react to some apologetics analysis of mine, all the time. The problem is, I don\u2019t feel that I can adjust my apologetics analyses according to how they will be received. I can do my best in \u201capproach.\u201d I can seek to be […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":13653,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[2347,2332,329,94,2538,2537,93,2019,4430],"class_list":["post-13651","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-catholic-apologetics","tag-apologetics","tag-catholic-apologetics","tag-christian-apologetics","tag-debate","tag-defense-of-christianity","tag-defense-of-the-catholic-faith","tag-dialogue","tag-lay-catholic-apologetics","tag-umpires"],"yoast_head":"\nApologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2017\/10\/Umpires.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"511\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html\",\"name\":\"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!","description":"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!","og_description":"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":511,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2017\/10\/Umpires.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html","name":"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-02T17:13:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"Apologists are a lot like umpires: making the calls and catching hell for the ones that one side disagrees with. The umpire can never please everyone.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/10\/apologists-like-umpires-can-never-be-too-popular.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Apologists, Like Umpires, Can Never Be TOO Popular!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13651","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13651"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13651\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/13653"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13651"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13651"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13651"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}