{"id":1519,"date":"2006-07-31T18:54:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-31T18:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html"},"modified":"2025-12-05T14:44:29","modified_gmt":"2025-12-05T18:44:29","slug":"books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html","title":{"rendered":"Books by Dave Armstrong: “Twin Scourges”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>
\n
\"Twin<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

(completed in June 2003; published by Lulu in September 2007; 167 pages)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

*
\n<\/span><\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Purchase Options<\/span><\/div>\n
***<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
[PAPERBACK: $19.95<\/a>] [KINDLE: 2.99<\/a>]<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
***<\/div>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/span>Table of Contents<\/span><\/strong><\/span>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Dedication<\/span>
\nForeword <\/span>(James Cardinal Gibbons)<\/span><\/span>
\nIntroduction<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n


\n<\/span>I <\/span> General Observations<\/span>
\nII <\/span> Martin Luther<\/span>
\nIII <\/span> Is All<\/i> Opposition to Catholicism \u201cAnti<\/i>-Catholicism\u201d?<\/span>
\nIV <\/span> Protestantism is Christian and Catholicism is Not?<\/span>
\nV <\/span> The Gospel and Faith and Works<\/span>
\nVI<\/span> \u201cDebates\u201d and \u201cDialogues\u201d with Anti-Catholics<\/span>
\nVII<\/span> Does the Term Anti-Catholic<\/i> Involve a Double Standard?<\/span>
\nVIII<\/span> Towards a Psychology of Anti-Catholicism<\/span>
\nIX <\/span> Anti-Sacramentalism<\/span>
\nX <\/span> Heterodox Catholics and Liberal Protestants<\/span>
\nXI <\/span> Nominal, Ignorant, and Sinful Catholics<\/span>
\nXII <\/span> Practical Problems Due to the Modernist Crisis <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Appendix One<\/span> Martin Luther\u2019s Anti-Catholic Statements<\/span>
\nAppendix Two<\/span> G.K. Chesterton on Anti-Catholicism<\/span>
\nAppendix Three<\/span> John Henry Cardinal Newman on Anti-Catholicism<\/span>
\nAppendix Four<\/span> Use of the Term Anti-Catholicism<\/i> in<\/span>
\nNon-Catholic Scholarly Circles<\/span>
\nAppendix Five<\/span> John Henry Cardinal Newman on<\/span>
\nTheological Liberalism<\/span>
\nAppendix Six <\/span>Catholic Encyclopedia<\/i> (1913): Modernism<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n


\n<\/span>Introduction<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
I shall follow in this book the numbered structural format of the classic work by the French mathematician, physicist, and Catholic apologist Blaise Pascal, Pensees<\/em> (\u201cthoughts\u201d \u2013 1662). My intention is to highlight general and particular characteristics of these theological aberrations, in the manner of \u201csayings\u201d \u2013 a literary technique used to great effect by our Lord Jesus Christ, St. Francis of Assisi, Confucius, and Socrates, among many others.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
In so doing I hope to introduce readers to the basic, underlying tenets and the false, misleading \u201cspirit\u201d which are part and parcel of both anti-Catholicism and theological liberalism, by means of \u201cponderings\u201d or \u201creflections\u201d or \u201cproverbs\u201d (generalizations which express broad truths \u2013 not intended as applying in absolutely every instance); as opposed to an exhaustive treatise and refutation of persons and their arguments.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
I\u2019m only interested in critiquing the erroneous ideas <\/i>and educating and equipping readers to think critically about the important issues at stake, so that they can in turn (it is to be devoutly hoped) go out and do the work of re-education that must occur among thousands who are caught up in (or adversely affected by) these tremendously harmful false beliefs.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
<\/div>\n
It will be helpful to offer brief definitions of my subject matter. I accept the commonly-used definition of anti-Catholicism<\/i> as the position which maintains that the Catholic Church is not Christian<\/i>, or that the system of Catholic theology is not a Christian set of beliefs. Catholicism is regarded as non-Christian, or sub-Christian, or grossly heretical: a dangerous, deceptive counterfeit of true, genuine Christianity.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
I am happy to report that anti-Catholicism is a small minority position amongst Protestants and Eastern Orthodox; yet it remains an influential and vocal one. Not all (or even many) Protestants or Orthodox are anti-Catholic, by any stretch of the imagination. Nor is mere critique of or disagreement with Catholic dogmas and beliefs automatically to be deemed anti-Catholic. One must deny the Christian status <\/i>of Catholicism.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
The essential error and sin of anti-Catholicism is, therefore, the outrageous falsehood involved in denying that a Christian group is Christian. It is bearing false witness, and slandering (whether maliciously or not) one\u2019s brothers in Christ. I have argued in many of my writings that a denial of the Christian status of the Catholic Church while claiming to be a Christian apart from it, involves one in certain self-defeating and fatal propositions which cannot be sustained for a moment in light of the history of Christianity. But that is beyond my immediate purview.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
I don\u2019t deny, of course, that anyone who is a trinitarian and who adheres to the Nicene Creed is (doctrinally) a Christian (that is basically the official Catholic position on other Christians), but I contend that for them to claim \u201cexclusivity\u201d to the title of Christian while denying it to the largest, most historically and theologically influential Christian group, is absurd and ludicrous, on many grounds.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
Some of the common or recurring motifs of anti-Catholicism are charges of Mariolatry, idolatry (of statues \u2013 iconoclasm \u2013 and the consecrated host, particularly), Semi-Pelagianism and a \u201creligion of works,\u201d denigration of the Bible and pervasive \u201cunbiblical\u201d notions, undue influence of paganism, \u201cunbiblical\u201d sacramentalism and sacerdotalism, undue emphasis on Tradition and Church authority (above all, the pope, of course), and various conspiratorial theories involving the so-called \u201cWhore of Babylon,\u201d the pope-as-antichrist, the one-world heretical and apostate religion, and so forth.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
Often corresponding to these \u201chostile\u201d beliefs are various prejudices and misinformed rhetoric and propaganda which derive from a continuous tradition, passed down in certain circles and taken in by members of anti-Catholic groups almost as if by osmosis, without very much reflection or consultation of the other \u201cside\u201d which is being berated and condemned.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
By theological liberalism <\/i>I mean the various versions of ostensibly or vaguely Christian teaching which depart from historic Christian orthodoxy, as defined in Councils, Creeds, and Confessions down through history. Christians of all stripes agree on many things with regard to theology. Perhaps the most common criteria of \u201corthodoxy\u201d in a larger Christian sense would be the Nicene Creed. As a Catholic, of course I would adhere to the orthodoxy defined by the Catholic Church and the popes. But I will not always necessarily treat liberalism in that narrower sense in this book.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
C. S. Lewis stated that those in the center of their Christian traditions (that it, the orthodox) have much more in common with each other than with the liberals in their own communions. How true that is! Thus, in many ways, my orthodox Protestant brethren will be able to agree with and relate to my criticism of liberalism, because they, too, are burdened with the problem. Liberalism is the \u201cscourge\u201d of all who profess to adhere to the orthodox understanding of the theology of their own Christian tradition.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
Theological liberalism involves many fallacies, double standards, and arbitrary distinctions which shall be treated in the book. At bottom, one might say that it is characterized by a lack of faith and belief. Once one picks and chooses what they want to believe in Christianity on ultimately arbitrary grounds other than the Bible, Tradition, and the teaching that has been preserved and passed down from the apostles, then a loss of supernatural faith occurs and the person has, in effect, made themselves the Judge of things which they have no business judging.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
Christianity (by definition) requires revelation, faith, and the miraculous. If any of these aspects are attacked or disbelieved, then liberalism and the spirit of heterodoxy or heresy or modernism or dissent are present. Yet most such persons continue on in the Christian community after they have ceased believing in various Christian beliefs, either not being aware of it (lack of education) or knowing full well that their belief has shifted, but assuming that it doesn\u2019t matter, and that they are just as just as orthodox as any other Christian (obstinacy, intellectual dishonesty and rebellion within the fold). This poses many sociological and pastoral difficulties for Christian groups.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
May God help those in both parties (and adherence of other such false or heretical notions) to be made aware of the seriousness of their error, to repent, and to regain a robust supernatural faith and renewed devotion as a disciple of Jesus.<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n

Excerpts<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

10. The usual, scholarly Catholic definition of anti-Catholic<\/i> has nothing to do with emotionalism or hostility or arrogance at all; it is a doctrinal<\/i> or theological <\/i>definition, not a personal or emotional one. But it must be noted that those other things more often than not accompany <\/i>the anti-Catholic theological beliefs, in practice.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
48. Anti-Catholic<\/i> is a legitimate term. It shouldn\u2019t be used as a club to the exclusion of talking, or wielded by those who have a persecution complex, or to dismiss all criticism of Catholicism whatever, to the exclusion of intelligent discourse, but the term itself is entirely proper, which is why non-Catholic scholars (particularly sociologists and Church historians) use it all the time. This is what a lot of people hung up on refuting the Catholic Church don\u2019t seem to get.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
51. By the criteria of anti-Catholic Protestant critics of Catholicism, a Catholic can only be a \u201creal\u201d Christian insofar as (in direct proportion to) they reject those tenets of Catholicism which Protestantism rejects, or show an interest in things Protestants stress (for example, if they read the Bible a lot and talk about being \u201csaved,\u201d and show skepticism towards \u201call that weird Mary and the saints stuff,\u201d etc., chances are they are \u201cin\u201d). This is, of course, an extreme insult to any self-respecting, devout, faithful Catholic. Catholicism is either Christian or not. If it is, then a Catholic who believes every jot and tittle of Catholicism (as all Catholics are required to do by the nature<\/i> of the system) are Christians, in the sense I have described, just like any orthodox Presbyterian or Methodist or Lutheran or member of the Assemblies of God<\/a> is a Christian. One can quibble about the differences, but the core which binds us all is there.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
94. The title anti-Catholic<\/i> is not intended to refer to emotions or bigotry or hatred; it is strictly a descriptive \u2013 virtually sociological \u2013 title for one who opposes the Catholic Church-as-Christian. It means \u201canti-Catholic (Church),\u201d not \u201canti-Catholic (persons)\u201d in the sense of personal animus, as in \u201canti-Semitism.\u201d<\/span> Catholics use it in the sense of:<\/span> <\/span><\/div>\n
anti-abortion<\/span>
\n anti-lock brake system<\/span>
\n anti-theft device<\/span>
\n anti-Communist<\/span>
\n anti-disestablishmentarianism<\/span>
\n anti-trust<\/span>
\n anti-aircraft missiles<\/span>
\n anti-bacterial medicine<\/span>
\n anti-climax<\/span>
\n anti-depressant<\/span>
\n anti-oxidant<\/span>
\n anti-slavery<\/span>
\n anti-histamine<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
In this same exact sense I would describe myself as \u201canti-Mormon\u201d or \u201canti-Jehovah\u2019s Witnesses.\u201d I have indeed referred to myself as a \u201ccounter-cult researcher\u201d for many years. A synonym for that might be \u201canti-cult researcher.\u201d I am \u201canti-heretical.\u201d I do not regard these groups as Christian (I think they claim the title falsely). Anti-Catholics do not regard the Catholic Church<\/i> as a Christian institution.<\/span> <\/span><\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
113. When one views a scenario (in this case, Catholic vs. Protestant apologetics battles) as \u201cwar\u201d \u2013 with the stakes the very highest that they can be (hell vs. heaven; damnation vs. salvation; light vs. darkness; God vs. Satan), then one behaves like a warrior and a soldier. Thus, the anti-Catholic sees Catholics not as Christian brothers, but as the \u201cenemy\u201d \u2013 in spiritual darkness; outside the \u201cgates\u201d \u2013 and enemies are dealt with in a constant attitude of mistrust, cynicism, derision, and either outright hatred or at least intense hostility.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
123. Catholics have \u201cthe books,\u201d the dogmas, the decrees, the councils, the current Catechism<\/i>, the uniform, developed doctrinal history and Tradition. Everyone knows what the Catholic Church believes on any major topic. But if dissenters can\u2019t bring themselves to be honest with themselves and accept that this is what their Church holds, how is that a disproof of the oneness of Catholicism? It is none at all. They are simply straying sheep, heretical in spirit (to varying degrees). We can say they are not Catholic theologians if we so choose. But Protestants can only fight, disagree, and form a new sect when (inevitably) no resolution can be achieved. Is this not obvious?<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n
191. Many Protestants (especially evangelicals) play the \u201cignorance card\u201d sooner or later, in discussions of comparative religion, or polemical and \u201ccontroversial\u201d endeavors. It is an approach which is quite familiar to Catholic apologists. The question is fair enough, I suppose, and has some weight prima facie<\/i>. I believe, however, that this argument is fallacious, because there is no direct correlation between a religious body being doctrinally correct and the level of instruction and fidelity of its members. Ignorance, nominalism and heterodoxy can be due to many factors, none of which prove the theological falsehood of any given group. We can only judge by \u201cthe books\u201d of a religious body, in order to objectively and accurately evaluate its truth claims.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
Purchase Options<\/span><\/div>\n
***<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
[PAPERBACK: $19.95<\/a>] [KINDLE: 2.99<\/a>]<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n
***<\/div>\n

\n<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Last updated on 5 December 2025<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

(completed in June 2003; published by Lulu in September 2007; 167 pages) * Purchase Options *** [PAPERBACK: $19.95] [KINDLE: 2.99] *** \u00a0 \u00a0Table of Contents Dedication Foreword (James Cardinal Gibbons) Introduction I General Observations II Martin Luther III Is All Opposition to Catholicism \u201cAnti-Catholicism\u201d? IV Protestantism is Christian and Catholicism is Not? V The Gospel […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":4838,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[231,160,132],"tags":[855,2361,1562,137,571,135],"class_list":["post-1519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anti-catholicism","category-books-by-dave-armstrong","category-liberal-modernist-theology","tag-anti-catholic","tag-anti-catholicism","tag-catholic-dissenters","tag-heterodoxy","tag-modernism","tag-theological-liberalism"],"yoast_head":"\n"Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism"<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\""Twin Scourges" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"noindex, follow\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\""Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism"\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\""Twin Scourges" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-07-31T18:54:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-05T18:44:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2006\/07\/Twin-Scourges-551x833.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"508\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html\",\"name\":\"\\\"Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism\\\"\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-07-31T18:54:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-05T18:44:29+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"\\\"Twin Scourges\\\" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Books by Dave Armstrong: “Twin Scourges”\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism\"","description":"\"Twin Scourges\" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.","robots":{"index":"noindex","follow":"follow"},"og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism\"","og_description":"\"Twin Scourges\" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2006-07-31T18:54:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-05T18:44:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":508,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2006\/07\/Twin-Scourges-551x833.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html","name":"\"Twin Scourges: Thoughts on Anti-Catholicism & Theological Liberalism\"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-07-31T18:54:00+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-05T18:44:29+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"\"Twin Scourges\" critiques two very serious errors: that Catholicism is not truly Christian, & that one can pick & choose Catholic doctrines at will.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/07\/books-by-dave-armstrong-twin-scourges-thoughts-on-anti-catholicism-and-theological-liberalism.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Books by Dave Armstrong: “Twin Scourges”"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1519\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4838"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}