{"id":20648,"date":"2018-06-30T12:17:02","date_gmt":"2018-06-30T16:17:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=20648"},"modified":"2018-06-30T12:17:02","modified_gmt":"2018-06-30T16:17:02","slug":"denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html","title":{"rendered":"Denunciation of &#8220;Anti-Luther&#8221; Catholic Polemics"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-20654 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2018\/06\/Cochlaeus.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"618\" height=\"800\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">I\u2019ve been accused by some of being \u201canti-Luther\u201d in ways in which I am not at all. I disagree as a consistent Catholic with several of his teachings; happily agree with others. But I do not subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially of the sort that prevailed before Vatican II. Some Catholic historians, like Grisar, have a natural Catholic bias, but are not strictly \u201canti\u201d-Luther. Others, like O\u2019Hare, and Cochlaeus and Denifle, clearly are slanderously and venomously anti-Luther in a way that casts significant doubt upon the accuracy of their research.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">* * * * *<\/p>\n<p>Here is a sampling of my own past words along these lines:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I readily admit that [Hartmann] Grisar had a Catholic bias and a bias against Luther which is excessive, . . . He has some obvious bias. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(1-28-04)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I am [not] \u201canti-Luther\u201d in the way that many Catholic critics (Denifle et al) have been. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(2-22-04)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Patrick O\u2019Hare\u2019s book, <em>The Facts About Martin Luther<\/em>\u00a0(like many Catholic treatments of a hundred years or so ago) is very intemperate and lacking in charity towards Luther, and I agree that (for this reason) it is not a very good or objective source. I used to cite it when O\u2019Hare documented his claims from Luther\u2019s own words, but no longer do at all. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(9-25-04)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I would be wary of quotes (particularly isolated ones) from Heinrich Denifle (he had a notorious anti-Luther bias). If no context was provided, it is all the more questionable (as to the impression given).\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(2-22-07)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>[I took out] out all references to and from Patrick O\u2019Hare because I felt that his \u201canti-Luther\u201d emotional bias was sufficient enough to cast doubt on the usefulness of citing him at all. My objection to O\u2019Hare has to do with his unnecessary and obnoxious anti-Luther value judgments. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(3-26-07)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Let\u2019s consider for a moment criticisms of Patrick O\u2019Hare, and my own difficulties with that same polemical Catholic author.<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> (9-13-07)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Cochlaeus was venomously anti-Luther. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(1-12-08; private correspondence)<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Johann Cochlaeus, the 16th century \u201canti-Luther\u201d biographer and polemicist [was] nasty and mean to Luther, I freely grant, . . . <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">(1-15-08)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I have never <em>ever<\/em>\u00a0relied on Cochlaeus for <em>any<\/em>\u00a0argument with regard to ascertained historical facts about Martin Luther. I never had or read any of his material. It is true that Luther biographer Hartmann Grisar\u2019s writings helped me to formulate a new understanding of what went on in the so-called \u201cReformation\u201d but his were only one of many such writings from Catholics, including others like Karl Adam and Johannes Janssen (and Adam is even fairly well liked by Protestant polemicists); also non-Catholic historians like Will Durant.<\/p>\n<p>Now, it\u2019s true that my mention of Grisar in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/my-odyssey-from-evangelicalism-to-catholicism-2.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">my conversion story in <em>Surprised by Truth<\/em><\/a>\u00a0reads as if Grisar was the sole cause of my reversal on the basic merits of the \u201cReformation,\u201d but like all short treatments of any complex idea (my story was the shortest in the book because I was the only one who actually adhered to the suggested length requirement!), it can always use more \u201cfleshing-out.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The two much larger \u201ckeys\u201d \u2014 as I have always said; even again today on the radio \u2014 were development of doctrine and the issue of contraception. In fact, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/how-newman-convinced-me-to-become-a-catholic.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">my most technical and theologically oriented conversion story<\/a> (which was published in two magazines and in one of my own books) concentrated on development of doctrine as the one largest factor in my conversion, and never even mentions Grisar at all.<\/p>\n<p>I have always maintained that Cardinal Newman and development of doctrine were overwhelmingly the largest reason for my conversion. That can be verified in my several written accounts and in spoken testimonies on the radio (as I said, this very day I stated this again, in a radio appearance).<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t discount Grisar\u2019s Luther research because he has bias (a bias I have freely conceded, as seen above). Lots of people have bias (I would even say that <em>all<\/em> scholars do, if they are honest with themselves). The intelligent reader and researcher takes that into consideration. But we don\u2019t throw the baby out with the bathwater. The question is: \u201chow much bias turns one into an outright \u2018poor\u2019 researcher or scholar?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Not a few Protestants think Grisar crosses that line; I do <em>not<\/em>. But I could just as reasonably argue that these critics of Grisar don\u2019t like him at all because he criticizes their hero and the foundation-stone of their Protestantism, and they don\u2019t like that. They want to talk only about Grisar\u2019s bias and ignore (often) their own strong Protestant bias, and vested interest in having a certain perception and image of Luther (and a corresponding lower or lousy view of Catholicism).<\/p>\n<p>I don\u2019t deny Grisar\u2019s Catholic bias, and I object to his painting Luther as an \u201cevil\u201d man (insofar as he <em>does<\/em> that, and I\u2019ve seen him do it <em>at times<\/em>). But by and large, as far as I have been able to determine, his research (as the author of a six-volume biography of Luther) is accurate and sufficiently documented.<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p>(originally 1-11-08; slightly revised on 6-30-18)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Photo credit:\u00a0<\/strong><span class=\"text_exposed_show\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Johannes Cochlaeus (1479-1552): notorious anti-Luther polemicist<\/span> [public domain \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Johannes-Cochlaeus.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wikimedia Commons<\/a>]<\/span><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been accused by some of being \u201canti-Luther\u201d in ways in which I am not at all. I disagree as a consistent Catholic with several of his teachings; happily agree with others. But I do not subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially of the sort that prevailed before Vatican II. Some Catholic [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":20654,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[5903,628,5909,5900,5891,5894,4273,5888,488,5906,419,2348,5897,690,692,693,2349,691],"class_list":["post-20648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-martin-luther","tag-anti-luther-polemics","tag-anti-protestantism","tag-catholic-biographers-of-luther","tag-catholic-views-of-luther","tag-cochlaeus","tag-denifle","tag-hartmann-grisar","tag-johannes-cochlaeus","tag-luther","tag-luther-biography","tag-lutheranism-2","tag-martin-luther","tag-patrick-ohare","tag-protestant-reformation","tag-protestant-revolt","tag-protestant-revolution","tag-protestantism","tag-reformation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Denunciation of &quot;Anti-Luther&quot; Catholic Polemics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I disagree with several of Luther&#039;s teachings. But I don&#039;t subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Denunciation of &quot;Anti-Luther&quot; Catholic Polemics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I disagree with several of Luther&#039;s teachings. But I don&#039;t subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2018\/06\/Cochlaeus.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"618\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"800\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html\",\"name\":\"Denunciation of \\\"Anti-Luther\\\" Catholic Polemics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"I disagree with several of Luther's teachings. But I don't subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Denunciation of &#8220;Anti-Luther&#8221; Catholic Polemics\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Denunciation of \"Anti-Luther\" Catholic Polemics","description":"I disagree with several of Luther's teachings. But I don't subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Denunciation of \"Anti-Luther\" Catholic Polemics","og_description":"I disagree with several of Luther's teachings. But I don't subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":618,"height":800,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2018\/06\/Cochlaeus.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html","name":"Denunciation of \"Anti-Luther\" Catholic Polemics","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-30T16:17:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"I disagree with several of Luther's teachings. But I don't subscribe to certain excesses of Catholic Luther polemics: especially the type that prevailed before Vatican II.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/06\/denunciation-of-anti-luther-catholic-polemics.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Denunciation of &#8220;Anti-Luther&#8221; Catholic Polemics"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20648\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20654"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}