{"id":2328,"date":"2015-08-17T20:30:55","date_gmt":"2015-08-18T00:30:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=2328"},"modified":"2017-05-21T17:32:44","modified_gmt":"2017-05-21T21:32:44","slug":"luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html","title":{"rendered":"Luther&#8217;s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"color: #141823; padding-left: 30px; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/08\/StrawMen.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-2329 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/08\/StrawMen.jpg\" alt=\"StrawMen\" width=\"591\" height=\"886\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823; padding-left: 30px; text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #252525;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Bears in Straw of wheat and pea, 2000 carnival procession , Empfingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany; by Werner Baiker<\/span> [<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Strohb%C3%A4ren-Empfingen-2000.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wikimedia Commons<\/a> \/\u00a0<a class=\"extiw decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" title=\"w:en:GNU Free Documentation License\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/en:GNU_Free_Documentation_License\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">GNU Free Documentation License<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a class=\"extiw decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" title=\"w:en:Creative Commons\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/en:Creative_Commons\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Creative Commons<\/a>\u00a0<a class=\"external text decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/2.0\/de\/deed.en\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Attribution 2.0 Germany<\/a>\u00a0license]<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823; padding-left: 30px;\">The hypocritical Papists, being well aware that their false claim for the supremacy of the Pope cannot stand unless backed by his personal holiness, proceed to bolster up that falsehood by a greater one. They endeavor to give him the reputation of personal goodness by saying he cannot err, for the Holy Spirit never forsakes him, and Christ is ever with and in him. . . . Why do they tell such blasphemous falsehoods? Doubtless because they are aware of the futility of attempting to maintain supremacy without personal goodness; they would be compelled to admit that exaltation without piety must be of the devil.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823; padding-left: 30px;\">(Sermon for the Third Sunday in Advent; 1 Corinthians 4:1-5, from 1521)<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\">This is a very common error \/ misunderstanding; rampant within Protestantism. Here it is right at the source and font of that movement. The true Catholic teaching, of course, is that the pope is infallible under certain conditions, but that this infallibility does not necessarily entail personal holiness. It\u2019s preferable that the pope is a holy man, and most of the popes have been, but this has no direct bearing on his authority in the office of the papacy. Luther himself was always quick to distance his personal imperfections from his (self-proclaimed) authority, and claim that it is irrelevant to the latter; yet he vainly imagines that how Catholics view the relationship of authority and holiness is vastly different.<\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\">A Catholic friend replied: \u201cSuch statements make Luther seem either dumb or dishonest\u2013 perhaps both?\u201d\u00a0<span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892076590827327:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892076590827327:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end:0:$text4:0\">How I see it is that Luther was so prejudiced against the Catholic Church (sometimes with good reason because of the widespread corruption in morals of the time) that he frequently spewed falsehoods about it and painted it in the blackes<\/span><\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892076590827327:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892076590827327:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892076590827327:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">t light. Whether that was deliberate or a result of this prejudice is hard to tell. But the end result is the same in either event: misrepresentation: not of the sins of persons, but of official Catholic teaching.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\"><span data-ft='{\"tn\":\"K\"}' data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892086724159647:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body\"><span class=\" UFICommentBody _1n4g\" data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892086724159647:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892086724159647:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892086724159647:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$text0:0:$text0:0\">I have shown that Luther understood the doctrine of papal infallibility in his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2007\/10\/history-of-the-doctrine-of-papal-infallibility-incl-luthers-dissent-at-the-leipzig-disputation-in-1519.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Leipzig Disputation of 1519<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that <em>whatever<\/em>\u00a0powers of infallibility or protection the pope was granted (there was <em>some<\/em> dispute) were distinct from his personal holiness. That argument had been well-established by St. Augustine 1100 years earlier, and Luther was an Augustinian monk. It\u2019s two different things: infallibility and impeccability.\u00a0<\/span><br data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text1:0\"><br data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text3:0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text4:0\">Luther not infrequently made this distinction<em> about himself<\/em> (usually defending his acid tongue and hyper-rhetoric against complaints from friends and foes alike), but because of his prejudice against Catholicism, he is unable to fathom that the same thing holds there as well: office and personal sanctity are distinguishable from each other, with the former not dependent upon the latter.\u00a0<\/span><br data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text5:0\"><br data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text7:0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892145127487140:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end:0:$text8:0\">What Luther\u2019s error here amounts to is the sort of excessive rigorism and legalism embodied by the Donatists, Montanists, and other such schismatic sects.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892176540817332:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892176540817332:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">It\u2019s ironic, too, that Luther, later in his life, was absolutely disgusted with his own faction of Lutherans, and is on record blasting them over and over in no uncertain terms (I\u2019ve documented it, as usual!). He even admits that their lives are no bet<\/span><\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892176540817332:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892176540817332:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892176540817332:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">ter than those of the \u201cpapists.\u201d So with this pseudo-Donatist view of offices \/ sinfulness, where does that leave his Lutherans? Obviously no better off than the Catholics. At least he was honest about deficiencies n his own party. Credit where it is due . . . But he\u00a0couldn\u2019t see that they largely derived from the false principle of <em>sola Scriptura<\/em>.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">St. Paul called himself\u00a0the \u201cchief\u201d of sinners, yet Protestants are glad to grant him authority and make him their favorite saint and authority figure. King David and committed adultery, yet God (knowing he was to commit those crimes), said he was a man after his own heart, and made an eternal covenant with him. David was even a messianic prototype of our Lord Jesus.\u00a0<\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end:0:$text4:0\">Judas was still truly a disciple, and Jesus picked him<\/span><\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:5:1:$comment892051967496456_892509410784045:0.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end:0:$text0:0\">, didn\u2019t He? Paul called the Galatians and Corinthians brethren, even though they had serious sin; Jesus called the seven churches in revelation \u201cchurches\u201d. They didn\u2019t cease being so because of all kinds of serious sin.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #141823;\">These distinctions of authority or legitimate category and personal holiness are pretty basic. Its hard to believe that Luther didn\u2019t grasp them. So I can only conclude that he got carried away by his negative emotions, and logic and knowledge of the Bible and the history of Christian doctrine went out the window, when he talked about the dreaded \u201cantichrist\u201d popes.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bears in Straw of wheat and pea, 2000 carnival procession , Empfingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany; by Werner Baiker [Wikimedia Commons \/\u00a0GNU Free Documentation License\u00a0and\u00a0Creative Commons\u00a0Attribution 2.0 Germany\u00a0license] The hypocritical Papists, being well aware that their false claim for the supremacy of the Pope cannot stand unless backed by his personal holiness, proceed to bolster up that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":2329,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23,138],"tags":[139,140,141],"class_list":["post-2328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-martin-luther","category-papacy-infallibility","tag-impeccability","tag-infallibility","tag-sinners-in-the-church"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Luther&#039;s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Luther&#039;s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-08-18T00:30:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-21T21:32:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/08\/StrawMen.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html\",\"name\":\"Luther's Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-08-18T00:30:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-21T21:32:44+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Luther&#8217;s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Luther's Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?","description":"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Luther's Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?","og_description":"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_published_time":"2015-08-18T00:30:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-21T21:32:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/08\/StrawMen.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html","name":"Luther's Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-08-18T00:30:55+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-21T21:32:44+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"It was easily known or knowable in 1521 that papal infallibility was altogether distinct from his personal holiness (personal impeccability).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/08\/luthers-straw-man-papal-infallibility-personal-impeccability.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Luther&#8217;s Straw Man: Papal Infallibility = Personal Impeccability?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2329"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}