{"id":2815,"date":"2015-09-04T13:11:49","date_gmt":"2015-09-04T17:11:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=2815"},"modified":"2017-05-20T19:55:32","modified_gmt":"2017-05-20T23:55:32","slug":"thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html","title":{"rendered":"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/09\/CommunionTongue.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-2821\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/09\/CommunionTongue-300x283.jpg\" alt=\"CommunionTongue\" width=\"400\" height=\"379\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Holy Communion during Holy Matrimony (24 June 2006 in Poland)<\/span> [<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Ejdzej_and_Iric_wedding_communion-01.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wikimedia Commons<\/a> \/\u00a0<a class=\"extiw decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" title=\"w:en:Creative Commons\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/en:Creative_Commons\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Creative Commons<\/a><span style=\"color: #252525;\">\u00a0<\/span><a class=\"external text decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/3.0\/deed.en\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported<\/a><span style=\"color: #252525;\">\u00a0license]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Briefly, my position, as (mostly) expressed in my<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/communion-in-the-hand-standing-norm-till-500-900-ad.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">recent related post<\/a><span style=\"color: #000000;\">, is this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">1. Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as <em>intrinsically<\/em> superior, based on posture alone.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">2. Communion in the hand, standing, was the norm in the Church in its first 6-9 centuries, depending on location.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">3. Reverence and piety and holiness flow initially and primarily from the <em>heart<\/em>, not posture (per the Sermon on the Mount and many OT passages).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">4. Arguments can be made (and I\u2019ve made them myself) for <em>relative<\/em> preference for communion on the tongue, kneeling, in our <em>present time and place<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">5. Far too many recipients of Holy Communion in the hand today<em> seem<\/em> at first glance to <em>arguably<\/em> lack reverence.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">6. I myself receive kneeling, on the tongue, in my own (liturgically traditional) parish. In others, I generally receive in the hand (preceded by a deep bow).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">7. I \u00a0do all I can (without disrupting anything or making a \u201cscene\u201d) to receive from the priest, since he alone consecrated, and is the <em>alter Christus<\/em>. Nothing against extraordinary\u00a0ministers of Holy Communion (themselves widely over-used, which is directly against the rubrics). It\u2019s just my personal preference.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">8. Partaking of the cup is strictly optional, since the entire Body and Blood of Christ are contained in <em>either<\/em> consecrated form.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I\u2019ve had a few more random thoughts since, expressed in the combox of the prior post and on Facebook:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">* * * * *\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I think in <em>practice<\/em> communion in the <em>hand<\/em> often is irreverent, but again, I think that has to be analyzed within the overall context of a \u201cspirit\u201d among many Catholics of lack of reverence and understanding of transubstantiation, in their hearts. It\u2019s a matter of origins. In this thinking, communion in the hand is not the <em>initial cause<\/em> of lack of reverence, but rather,<em> prior factors<\/em> of nonbelief or \u201cnon-appreciation\u201d of the Holy Eucharist, already residing in the heart.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">***<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$comment1053450424689942_1053454464689538\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$comment1053450424689942_1053454464689538\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end\/=1$text4\/=010\">This is one of many instances where I defend one thing from irrational attack (as an apologist), while personally advocating and practicing another. I always seem to be in the \u201cmiddle\u201d of debates (seeing good points on both<\/span><\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$comment1053450424689942_1053454464689538\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$comment1053450424689942_1053454464689538\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$comment1053450424689942_1053454464689538\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end\/=1$text0\/=010\">\u00a0sides), but that\u2019s okay. If we don\u2019t stop unnecessarily attacking each other in the Church, the devil will continue to win great victories. He divides and conquers. That\u2019s what he loves (perhaps the best of all). We should worship and let worship . . .<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">***<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end\/=1$text0\/=010\">I have heard [as to why communion on the tongue became the norm for many centuries] that there was, e.g., concern in some people actually taking the host and preserving it (i.e., not consuming it right away), or desecration.\u00a0<\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.0.$end\/=1$text4\/=010\">It also came to be seen that receiving kneeling on the tongue was more representative of a revere<\/span><\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0\"><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end\/=1$text0\/=010\">nt posture, in accord with similar gestures like genuflection, etc.\u00a0<\/span><span data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053512488017069\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053597571341894\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.3.0.$end\/=1$text4\/=010\">That\u2019s why I believe there is something in the rubrics about bowing before even receiving in the hand. I always do it myself in parishes besides my own.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #141823;\" data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053537058014612\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053537478014570\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end\/=1$text0\/=010\">They [recipients in the hand] still touched the consecrated host with their hands. What\u2019s the big difference between a hand and a mouth, anyway? Both are parts of our bodies.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"color: #141823;\" data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053537058014612\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053537478014570\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end\/=1$text4\/=010\">God, as always, is looking at the <em>heart<\/em>, not hands and mouths. One can be reverent or irreverent (or reverent) in either posture.\u00a0Mouth, lips, and tongue of a person are no more consecrated than their hands.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #141823;\" data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053879204647064\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053882387980079\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end\/=1$text4\/=010\">This is a counter-argument to those who argue that reception in the hand is intrinsically irreverent, as if a hand is somehow different from a tongue in that regard.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"color: #141823;\" data-reactid=\".3.1:4:1:$replies1053450424689942_1053879204647064\/=10.1:2:$comment1053450424689942_1053882387980079\/=10.0.$right.0.$left.0.0.1.$comment-body.0.$end\/=1$text8\/=010\">Biblically, the tongue (here\u2019s a new argument!) \u2014 i.e., when it condemns, gossips, argues fruitlessly, etc. \u2014 is criticized by Jesus and Paul much more than the hand ever is.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Holy Communion during Holy Matrimony (24 June 2006 in Poland) [Wikimedia Commons \/\u00a0Creative Commons\u00a0Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported\u00a0license] Briefly, my position, as (mostly) expressed in my recent related post, is this: 1. Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone. 2. Communion in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":2821,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[360,366,365,368,106,367],"class_list":["post-2815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-eucharist-liturgy","tag-communion-in-the-hand","tag-communion-on-the-tongue","tag-holy-communion","tag-interior-disposition","tag-piety","tag-reverence"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-09-04T17:11:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-20T23:55:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/09\/CommunionTongue.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"633\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"599\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html\",\"name\":\"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-09-04T17:11:49+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-20T23:55:32+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence","description":"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence","og_description":"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2015-09-04T17:11:49+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-20T23:55:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":633,"height":599,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/09\/CommunionTongue.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html","name":"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-09-04T17:11:49+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-20T23:55:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"Neither communion in the hand nor on the tongue (and\/or kneeling) can be argued as intrinsically superior, based on posture alone.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/09\/thoughts-communion-in-the-hand-reverence.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Thoughts on Communion in the Hand and Reverence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2815"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2815\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2821"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}