{"id":3832,"date":"2015-10-09T11:13:39","date_gmt":"2015-10-09T15:13:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=3832"},"modified":"2017-05-18T14:40:30","modified_gmt":"2017-05-18T18:40:30","slug":"nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html","title":{"rendered":"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/10\/MarsHill3.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-3833 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/10\/MarsHill3.jpg\" alt=\"MarsHill3\" width=\"550\" height=\"412\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Mars Hill in Athens, or the <em>Areopagus<\/em>, as seen from the Acropolis (where St. Paul preached to the pagan Athenian philosophers). Photo by A. Mustafin, 25 April 2007.<\/span> [<a href=\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Areopagus_hill.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Wikimedia Commons<\/a> \/\u00a0<a class=\"extiw decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" title=\"w:en:Creative Commons\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/en:Creative_Commons\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Creative Commons<\/a><span style=\"color: #252525;\">\u00a0<\/span><a class=\"external text decorated-link\" style=\"color: #663366;\" href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/publicdomain\/zero\/1.0\/deed.en\" rel=\"nofollow\" target=\"_blank\">CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication<\/a><span style=\"color: #252525;\">\u00a0license]<\/span><\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">This is an exchange I had in the combox of my post <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/legitimate-atheist-anger.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Legitimate Atheist Anger<\/a>. Otto is an atheist. His words will be in <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">blue<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">* * * * *<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><em>Rejection<\/em> of God is treated harshly in the Bible (as we would expect).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">And it calls us \u201cfools\u201d \u2014 something many Christians I have talked with love to trot out usually when some point has been soundly refuted. It is a dialog stopper and it comes from the Holy Book\u2026 which in turn broad brushes us as a large group and is something you say you are completely against.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">I don\u2019t bring this up to cause a problem, I only point it out as one source of the vitriol between our groups. Since the source in this case is seen as being divine in origin by many Christians it is seen by some of them as being indisputable. That is problematic.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We can\u2019t tell if a person\u2019s atheism is from an outright rebellious spirit or out of misinformation or lack of information and knowledge. In my long experience in debating atheists I almost always find that it is the latter (from my perspective). The Biblical \u201cfool\u201d refers to those who<em> know<\/em>\u00a0there is a God and reject Him.<\/span> <span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is my point. We can\u2019t \u201cknow\u201d that about any given atheist. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We must assume good will and good faith, and that directly affects our attitude in approaching others.<\/span> <span style=\"color: #000000;\">I know full well what it is like for others to casually assume that I am a wascally wascal and scoundrel and all-around jerk and bum, evil and wicked, unregenerate, filled with only evil motives, etc. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/11\/anti-catholicism-index-page.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">anti-Catholic Protestants <\/a><span style=\"color: #000000;\">deny that I am a Christian, and in extreme cases, think they know with certainty that I am predestined to hell (even though John Calvin said<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2006\/01\/john-calvin-only-god-knows-who-is-numbered-among-the-elect.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">no one could know that about another<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">So, to my atheist friends: I know <em>exactly<\/em>\u00a0how it feels to be on the receiving end of these uncharitable and empty-headed attitudes. I get it from my fellow Christians (have for 25\u00a0years since I became a Catholic): basically the same group that gives <em>you<\/em>\u00a0the <em>most<\/em>\u00a0trouble, too, though anti-atheism can be found across the board in all Christian circles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">That is one interpretation<\/span> [about the biblical \u201cfool\u201d]. <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">I don\u2019t think it makes a lot of sense when read that way but it is a kinder view.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">And I know a lot of Catholics experience bigotry from other Christians, I have experienced that first hand as well. It is one of many reasons the separation of Church and state is vitally important and was included.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Romans 1:21-22 backs up what I say:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">[RSV] for although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened. [22] Claiming to be wise, they became fools,<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is deliberate rejection of what is known to be true.<\/span> <span style=\"color: #000000;\">But in cases of mere ignorance, it is different. An example is Paul\u2019s treatment of the Athenians:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Acts 17:22-30<\/strong> So Paul, standing in the middle of the Are-op\u2019agus, said: \u201cMen of Athens, I perceive that in every way you are very religious. [23] For as I passed along, and observed the objects of your worship, I found also an altar with this inscription, `To an unknown god.\u2019 What therefore you worship as unknown, this I proclaim to you. [24] The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in shrines made by man, [25] nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all men life and breath and everything. [26] And he made from one every nation of men to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their habitation, [27] that they should seek God, in the hope that they might feel after him and find him. Yet he is not far from each one of us, [28] for `In him we live and move and have our being\u2019; as even some of your poets have said, `For we are indeed his offspring.\u2019 [29] Being then God\u2019s offspring, we ought not to think that the Deity is like gold, or silver, or stone, a representation by the art and imagination of man. [30] The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all men everywhere to repent,<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">These people were ignorant, and didn\u2019t know what the \u201cgod\u201d they worshiped was like (hence their altar and its inscription). They were more like agnostics. The text refers to \u201cignorance.\u201d Paul treated them with respect. He didn\u2019t see the altar and immediately condemn them to hell.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Another similar instance is when Jesus encountered a Roman centurion (who would have been a pagan also, insofar as he was religious at all). Jesus didn\u2019t condemn him and tell him he must believe in God. He commended him for extraordinary faith:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Matthew 8:5-10<\/strong> As he entered Caper\u2019na-um, a centurion came forward to him, beseeching him\u00a0[6] and saying, \u201cLord, my servant is lying paralyzed at home, in terrible distress.\u201d\u00a0[7] And he said to him, \u201cI will come and heal him.\u201d\u00a0[8] But the centurion answered him, \u201cLord, I am not worthy to have you come under my roof; but only say the word, and my servant will be healed.\u00a0[9] For I am a man under authority, with soldiers under me; and I say to one, `Go,\u2019 and he goes, and to another, `Come,\u2019 and he comes, and to my slave, `Do this,\u2019 and he does it.\u201d\u00a0[10] When Jesus heard him, he marveled, and said to those who followed him, \u201cTruly, I say to you, not even in Israel have I found such faith.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This isn\u2019t some concept pulled out of a hat (or thin air) in the last 50 years, in which ecumenism and tolerance has been relatively more stressed by the Catholic Church. It\u2019s in the Bible. It wasn\u2019t forgotten in the Middle Ages, either. St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) expressly taught it; drawing the following distinction:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">a) \u201cUnbelief by way of pure negation\u201d (<i>infidelitas secundum negationem puram<\/i>) in case a man may \u201cbe called an unbeliever merely because he has not the faith\u201d \u201cin those who have heard nothing about the faith\u201d; this Unbelief is not a sin -and<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">b) \u201cUnbelief by way of opposition to the faith\u201d (<i>infidelitas secundum contrarietatem ad fidem<\/i>) when \u201ca man refuses to hear the faith\u201d (S.Th II II, 10,1 c); this Unbelief is a sin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The fact that \u201cunbelief by way of pure negation\u201d is not a sin, is not only a Thomist concept, but it\u2019s also a verity of faith: St. Pius V condemned the proposition\u00a0<i>Infidelitas pure negativa in his quibus Christus non est predicatus peccatum est<\/i>\u00a0(D +1068) (=Purely negative unbelief, in those whom Christ was not preached to, is a sin).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In fact St. Thomas teaches that \u201cNobody would believe if he doesn\u2019t see he must believe\u201d (<i>non enim crederet nisi videret ea esse credenda\u00a0<\/i>\u2013 S.Th., II II, q. 1, a. 4 ad 2).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549; padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">(from a lengthy paper of mine about<\/span> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2007\/03\/dialogue-on-salvation-outside-church.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">salvation outside the Church<\/a>)<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">My point wasn\u2019t that you could not justify your view, nor did I doubt you could back up your position with Biblical references.<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Some other Christians would claim God has already provided enough information and therefore they are still justified in calling us fools. They would be able to provide Biblical references to back up their positions. You could no more convince them that they were wrong then I could\u2026and therein lies the problem. The Bible can justify multiple positions that directly contradict each other, the issues become debated but there is no real resolution. It is a Mexican stand off holding Bibles.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Yeah, people disagree on the Bible. All one can do is make their case, and bring to bear cross-referencing, Greek or Hebrew, etc. I think my case here is fairly strong and can withstand critique.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">A lot of the interpretation difficulties (disagreements) arise from the Protestant system of Bible Only (the only infallible authority).<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We Catholics also believe that it is inspired and infallible, but we also believe in an infallible Church and sacred tradition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Therefore, we have a \u201ccheck\u201d that doesn\u2019t allow us to interpret the Bible against established doctrine. There are still theological liberals who ignore that, but they are not operating consistently within the Catholic system as it is. They\u2019re playing games and being intellectually dishonest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">However, with most questions of biblical interpretation, as long as a dogma is not directly involved, Catholics have as much freedom as anyone else to interpret it as an individual.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I have shown\u00a0that there is a tradition like the one I have given you, that goes back at least as far as Aquinas. Thus, I show that I am within the received Catholic tradition in how I am interpreting these passages.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">There are plenty of real fools out there, who know God exists and reject Him. I\u2019m not denying that in the least. If they do that, we believe that they will wind up in hell by their own choice. I\u2019m not modifying any traditional Catholic understanding.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">All I\u2019m saying is that there is also a less culpable category of those who do not yet believe in God; so that we can approach atheists with much more courtesy and grant them the benefit of the doubt and good faith.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Going back to my point is that some Christians feel they are justified by the teachings of their God to think of all atheists as fools and therefore lesser at least on some level. It is a foundation of divisiveness and helps get the ball rolling for the vitriol. My point is that for some it is built into the system. It is only one aspect of the problem to be sure but it is a special issue because to those that hold such a position its foundation is ultimate cannot be overcome through discussion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">They\u2019re wrong. I have shown how it is wrong from the Bible. Paul really <strong><em>did\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>treat the pagan Athenians in a tolerant, respectful, loving way. Anyone who believes in the veracity of the biblical account of his missionary journeys, and\/or biblical inspiration can hardly deny that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Jesus really <strong><em>did\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>treat the pagan Roman centurion\u00a0in a tolerant, respectful, loving way. Even if it is denied as an actual historical event, the<em> teaching<\/em>\u00a0still remains, so that we can say that there is a motif in the Bible that distinguishes between atheist rebellion against\u00a0a God <em>known<\/em> to exist, and people who are <em>ignorant<\/em> (i.e., simply <em>don\u2019t yet know<\/em>) of God\u2019s existence. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This should <em>encourage<\/em> you. <em>Accept<\/em> this positive argument! I have shown you that Christians who treat atheists cruelly are wrong. Their behavior can\u2019t be biblically justified. Even if they casually assume you are a wicked person on the way to hell\u00a0(which they can\u2019t know for sure; how could they be sure of that?), their obligation is to exhibit love, so as to try to convince you that there is a better Way. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I can\u2019t do any more than that. If you know some Christian nitwits who argue as you say, send them here and I\u2019ll deal with them. They don\u2019t have a leg to stand on, in terms of the Bible.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But are there <strong><em>some<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0atheists who know that God exists and reject Him? Absolutely.<\/span><br style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><br style=\"color: #3f4549;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I don\u2019t deny <em>that<\/em>. Rather, I deny:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">1) that <strong><em>all\u00a0<\/em><\/strong>atheists are of that nature (most <em>agnostics<\/em> clearly are <em>not<\/em>), <\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">and\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">2) that we can <em>know with assurance<\/em> which ones<em> are<\/em> and which are <em>not<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Therefore, given these inherent limitations, we should approach all atheists and agnostics with charity, civility, tolerance, and courtesy \u2014 freely granting them the benefit of the doubt, and believing the <em>best<\/em> of them, not the <em>worst<\/em>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Mars Hill in Athens, or the Areopagus, as seen from the Acropolis (where St. Paul preached to the pagan Athenian philosophers). Photo by A. Mustafin, 25 April 2007. [Wikimedia Commons \/\u00a0Creative Commons\u00a0CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication\u00a0license] *** This is an exchange I had in the combox of my post Legitimate Atheist Anger. Otto is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":3833,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[124],"tags":[267,1066,258,1063,1064,1065,1062],"class_list":["post-3832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atheism-agnosticism","tag-agnosticism","tag-areopagus","tag-atheism","tag-ignorance-about-god","tag-invincible-ignorance","tag-mars-hill","tag-rejection-of-god"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"We can&#039;t tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"We can&#039;t tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-10-09T15:13:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-18T18:40:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/10\/MarsHill3.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"550\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"412\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html\",\"name\":\"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-10-09T15:13:39+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-18T18:40:30+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"We can't tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics","description":"We can't tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics","og_description":"We can't tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2015-10-09T15:13:39+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-18T18:40:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":550,"height":412,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/10\/MarsHill3.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html","name":"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-10-09T15:13:39+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-18T18:40:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"We can't tell if atheists or agnostics possess an outright rebellious spirit or rather, have misinformation or lack of information and knowledge.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/nt-on-god-rejecters-vs-open-minded-agnostics.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New Testament on God-Rejecters vs. Open-Minded Agnostics"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3832\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}