blue<\/span>).<\/p>\n*****<\/p>\n
A Chart of Heretical Eastern Patriarchs<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>
Patriarchal See \/ Patriarch \/ Years \/ Heresy<\/span><\/strong><\/center>\n\n- \n
\n- \n
\n- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Paul of Samosata\u00a0<\/span>260-269<\/span>\u00a0Modalist<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Eulalius\u00a0<\/span>c. 322\u00a0<\/span>Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Euphronius\u00a0<\/span>c. 327-c. 329<\/span>\u00a0Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Eusebius\u00a0<\/span>341-42<\/span>\u00a0Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Macedonius\u00a0<\/span>342-60<\/span>\u00a0Semi-Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Leontius\u00a0<\/span>344-58\u00a0<\/span>Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0George\u00a0<\/span>357-61\u00a0<\/span>Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Eudoxius\u00a0<\/span>358-60<\/span>\u00a0Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Eudoxius\u00a0<\/span>360\u00a0<\/span>Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Euzoius\u00a0<\/span>361-78\u00a0<\/span>Arian<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Nestorius\u00a0<\/span>428-31<\/span>\u00a0Nestorian!<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0Dioscorus\u00a0<\/span>448-51<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria\u00a0<\/span>Timothy Aelurus\u00a0<\/span>457-60, 475-77<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Peter the Fuller\u00a0<\/span>470, 475-7, 482-88<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Acacius<\/span>\u00a0471-89<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0John Codonatus\u00a0<\/span>477, 488<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria\u00a0<\/span>Peter Mongo\u00a0<\/span>477-90<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Palladius\u00a0<\/span>488-98<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Phravitas\u00a0<\/span>489-90\u00a0<\/span>Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Euphemius\u00a0<\/span>490-96<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0Athanasius II\u00a0<\/span>490-96<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0John II\u00a0<\/span>496-505<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0John III\u00a0<\/span>505-518\u00a0<\/span>Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople\u00a0<\/span>Timothy I\u00a0<\/span>511-17<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Severus\u00a0<\/span>512-18<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0Timothy III\u00a0<\/span>518-35\u00a0<\/span>Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>Anthimus\u00a0<\/span>535-36<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0Theodosius\u00a0<\/span>535-38<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Sergius\u00a0<\/span>c. 542-c. 557<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Paul \u201cthe Black\u201d\u00a0<\/span>c. 557-578<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria<\/span>\u00a0Damianus<\/span>\u00a0570-c. 605\u00a0<\/span>Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch\u00a0<\/span>Peter Callinicum\u00a0<\/span>578-91<\/span>\u00a0Monophysite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Sergius\u00a0<\/span>610-38<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Anthanasius<\/span>\u00a0c. 621-629\u00a0<\/span>Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Alexandria\u00a0<\/span>Cyrus\u00a0<\/span>c. 630-642<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Pyrrhus\u00a0<\/span>638-41\u00a0<\/span>Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch\u00a0<\/span>Macedonius<\/span>\u00a0640-c. 655<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0Paul II\u00a0<\/span>641-52<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople\u00a0<\/span>Peter\u00a0<\/span>652-64<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Antioch<\/span>\u00a0Macarius\u00a0<\/span>c. 655-681<\/span>\u00a0Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n
- Constantinople<\/span>\u00a0John VI\u00a0<\/span>711-15\u00a0<\/span>Monothelite<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
First, I note you are not very scrupulous about citing what you lift\u00a0verbatim, or even about checking its truth before posting it.\u00a0 You have<\/span>
\nplagiarized this list and text from the site of well-known web-warrior\u00a0and all-round hack, Dave Armstrong.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\nThey are also factually incorrect.\u00a0 For a start, its Antiochene lineage\u00a0immediately after Severus (Sergius c.542-c.557; Paul \u201cthe Black\u201d<\/span>
\nc.557-578; Peter Callinicum 578-91) is false.\u00a0\u00a0 These were not\u00a0Patriarchs of Antioch, but interlopers of the lineage of James Baradaeus<\/span>
\nof Edessa.\u00a0\u00a0 The recognized Patriarchs of Antioch of this time were:<\/span><\/p>\nPaul II\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 519-521 d. ?<\/span>
\nEuphrasius\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 521-526<\/span>
\nEphraim\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 527-545<\/span>
\nDomnus III\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 545-559<\/span>
\nSt. Anastasius I\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 559-570 d. 598<\/span>
\nGregory I\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 570-593<\/span>
\nSt. Anastasius I (restored) 593-598<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\nYou can<\/span> confirm this list<\/a> at the Antiochian Archdiocese Website<\/span>. Your list does the same thing\u00a0with the Alexandrian See, by including under the Chalcedonian succession\u00a0Prelates of the Coptic succession (e.g. Damianos 570-c.605).<\/span><\/p>\nSecondly, the putative Armstrong\u2019s (I am not sure he even wrote it and\u00a0not one of his stooges) method of gauging the orthodoxy of the East \u201cas\u00a0<\/span>represented by its three greatest bishops,\u201d is plainly ridiculous,\u00a0because it pays no attention to the internal dynamics between the\u00a0bishops of the Eastern Church who were divided over how to interpret\u00a0Nicea and Chalcedon.\u00a0 The two (Constantinople, Antioch) of the East\u2019s \u201cthree\u00a0<\/span>greatest bishops\u201d almost always fell prey to Imperial attempts at\u00a0fostering unity with an Alexandria bent on rejecting the Nestorian tone\u00a0<\/span>of Chalcedon (particularly its Leonine contributions).<\/span><\/p>\nBut this does not mean that all Antiochene or Constantinopolitan bishops succumbed to\u00a0the view of the Patriarch the emperor had placed over them.\u00a0 They did not.<\/span><\/p>\nOf course. I never said that they\u00a0did<\/em>\u00a0(which doesn\u2019t take a rocket scientist to conclude). One must read my writing (and\u00a0any<\/em>\u00a0writing) in context. I made it very clear what I was attempting to argue. For example, I stated:<\/span><\/p>\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2020\/02\/ConstantinopleWalls.jpg\")
<\/p>\n