Intelligentsia, The; Scholars; The Learned<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nAs I have pointed out elsewhere in this book, the expert is more aristocratic than the aristocrat, because the aristocrat is only the man who lives well, while the expert is the man who knows better. (H, ch. 16)<\/p>\n
I think that you and I are quite justified in disagreeing with doctors, however extraordinary in their erudition, if they violate ordinary reason in their line of argument.<\/p>\n
For I rebel against the man of learning when he suddenly, and in public, refuses to think.<\/p>\n
But when learned men begin to use their reason, then I generally discover that they haven\u2019t got any. (ILN, \u201cArguing With Erudition,\u201d 10-31-08)<\/p>\n
One does not need any learning to say that a man was killed or that a man was raised from the dead.<\/p>\n
One does not need to be an astronomer to say that a star fell from heaven; or a botanist to say that a fig tree withered; or a chemist to say that one had seen water turned to wine; or a surgeon to say that one has seen wounds in the hands of St. Francis. (ILN, \u201cMiracles and Scientific Method,\u201d 4-17-09)<\/p>\n
The third class is that of the Professors or Intellectuals; sometimes described as the thoughtful people; and these are a blight and a desolation both to their families and also to mankind.<\/p>\n
The Prigs rise above the people by refusing to understand them: by saying that all their dim, strange preferences are prejudices and superstitions.<\/p>\n
The Prigs make the people feel stupid; the Poets make the people feel wiser than they could have imagined that they were.<\/p>\n
The Prigs who despise the people are often loaded with lands and crowned.<\/p>\n
In the House of Commons, for instance, there are quite a number of prigs, but comparatively few poets.<\/p>\n
He has not sufficient finesse and sensitiveness to sympathize with the mob.<\/p>\n
His only notion is coarsely to contradict it, to cut across it, in accordance with some egotistical plan of his own; to tell himself that, whatever the ignorant say, they are probably wrong.<\/p>\n
He forgets that ignorance often has the exquisite intuitions of innocence. (AD, ch. 23)<\/p>\n
But the curious thing about the educated class is that exactly what it does not know is what it is talking about. (UTO, \u201cThe Empire of the Ignorant\u201d)<\/p>\n
Why is it that for the last two or three centuries the educated have been generally wrong and the uneducated relatively right?<\/p>\n
What the educated man has generally done was to ram down everybody\u2019s throat some premature and priggish theory which he himself afterwards discovered to be wrong; so wrong that he himself generally recoiled from it and went staggering to the opposite extreme. (ILN, \u201cThe Wisdom of the Ignorant,\u201d 8-9-24)<\/p>\n
The professor can preach any sectarian idea, not in the name of a sect, but in the name of a science. (ILN, \u201cCompulsory Education<\/p>\n
and the Monkey Trial,\u201d 8-8-25)<\/p>\n
And those who have been there will know what I mean when I say that, while there are stupid people everywhere, there is a particular minute and microcephalous idiocy which is only found in an intelligentsia.<\/p>\n
I have sometimes fancied that, as chilly people like a warm room, silly people sometimes like a diffused atmosphere of intellectualism and long words. (ILN, \u201cThe Defense of the Unconventional,\u201d 10-17-25)<\/p>\n
So many people, especially learned people and even clever people, seem to be quite unable to see the upshot of a thing; or what the French call its reason of being. (ILN, \u201cThe Point \u2013 Getting It and Missing It,\u201d 10-30-26)<\/p>\n
I have frequently visited such societies, in the capacity of a common or normal fool, and I have almost always found there a few fools who were more foolish than I had imagined to be possible to man born of woman; people who had hardly enough brains to be called half-witted.<\/p>\n
But it gave them a glow within to be in what they imagined to be the atmosphere of intellect; for they worshipped it like an unknown god.<\/p>\n
Intelligence does exist even in the Intelligentsia.<\/p>\n
Anyhow, it is in this intellectual world, with its many fools and few wits and fewer wise men, that there goes on perpetually a sort of ferment of fashionable revolt and negation. (TT, ch. 6)<\/p>\n
But a large section of the Intelligentsia seemed wholly devoid of Intelligence.<\/p>\n
As was perhaps natural, those who pontificated most pompously were often the most windy and hollow. (A, ch. 7)<\/p>\n
Materialism (Scientific and Philosophical)<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/p>\nI have come into the country where men do definitely believe that the waving of the trees makes the wind.<\/p>\n
That is to say, they believe that the material circumstances, however black and twisted, are more important than the spiritual realities, however powerful and pure.<\/p>\n
By perpetually talking about environment and visible things, by perpetually talking about economics and physical necessity, painting and keeping repainted a perpetual picture of iron machinery and merciless engines, of rails of steel, and of towers of stone, modern materialism at last produces this tremendous impression in which the truth is stated upside down. (TRE, ch. 14)<\/p>\n
It was the materialists who destroyed materialism, merely by studying matter.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nWe have been accused of hostility to the scientist, when we are merely hostile to the materialist.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nThe venerable Victorian materialist wanted the world to grow more and more scientific; but only on the strict condition that the science should grow more and more materialistic. (ILN, \u201cOld Science and New Science,\u201d 5-9-31)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nIf fifty years hence the electron is as entirely exploded as the atom, it will not affect us; for we have never founded our philosophy on the electron any more than on the atom. (WEL, \u201cThe Collapse of Materialism\u201d)<\/p>\n
Science, Scientists, and Popular Science<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nThe telescope makes the world smaller; it is only the microscope that makes it larger. (H, ch. 3)<\/p>\n
The only evil that science has ever attempted in our time has been that of dictating not only what should be known, but the spirit in which it should be regarded.<\/p>\n
Science must not impose any philosophy, any more than the telephone must tell us what to say.<\/p>\n
There is no objection to scientists splitting open the world like the uncle\u2019s watch; in order to look at the works of it so long as those scientists feel like children. (ILN, \u201cScience: Pro and Con,\u201d 10-9-09)<\/p>\n
The extreme doctrine of Science for Science\u2019s Sake has proved just as impossible as Art for Art\u2019s Sake. (ILN, \u201cEvolution and Ethics,\u201d 9-10-27)<\/p>\n
They had no right to insist on men accepting the latest word of science as the last word of science.<\/p>\n
Yet they were also insistently boasting that science had not concluded and would never conclude. (ILN, \u201cThe Bible and the Sceptics,\u201d 4-20-29)<\/p>\n
Quackery is false science; it is everywhere apparent in cheap and popular science; and the chief mark of it is that men who begin by boasting that they have cast away all dogma go on to be incessantly, impudently, and quite irrationally dogmatic. (ILN, \u201cQuackery About the Family,\u201d 7-12-30)<\/p>\n
Science (and Religion)<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nThe truths of religion are unprovable; the facts of science are unproved. (ILN, \u201cFaith Healing and Medicine,\u201d 11-5-10)<\/p>\n
We in the West have \u201cfollowed our reason as far as it would go,\u201d and our reason has led us to things that nearly all the rationalists would have thought wildly irrational. (NJ, ch. 9)<\/p>\n
The problem of Religion and Science is still presented in the narrow Victorian version of a quarrel between Darwin and Moses. (ILN, \u201cThe Younger Pagans,\u201d 8-21-26)<\/p>\n
But in the Victorian debates between Science and religion, about such a question as the Deluge, there was a double ignorance and an ambiguity on both sides. (ILN, \u201cThe Bible and the Sceptics,\u201d 4-20-29)<\/p>\n
The Electron, as now expounded, is much more of a mystery than the Trinity.<\/p>\n
There were, indeed, venerable Victorians, of the agnostic sort, who would have been very much surprised to learn that science had not destroyed religion by A.D. 2030. (ILN, \u201cReligion and the New Science,\u201d 4-12-30)<\/p>\n
It is amusing to think that even religious people may still be driven to abandon religion by a science which scientists have abandoned. (ILN, \u201cThe Place of Mysticism,\u201d 5-24-30)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nSecularism<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nThe secularists have not wrecked divine things; but the secularists have wrecked secular things, if that is any comfort to them. (O, ch. 8)<\/p>\n
Nearly all newspaper correspondences now revolve around religion, which we were told about fifty years ago had finally disappeared. (ILN, \u201cModern Doubts and Questioning,\u201d 2-13-26)<\/p>\n
Never until the nineteenth century was it supposed that the Church or Temple was a sort of side-show that had nothing to do with the State. (ILN, \u201cThe Guilt of the Churches,\u201d 7-26-30)<\/p>\n
For the word \u201csecular\u201d does not mean anything so sensible as \u201cworldly.\u201d<\/p>\n
To be secular simply means to be of the age; that is, of the age which is passing; of the age which, in their case, is already passed.<\/p>\n
There is one adequate equivalent of the word \u201csecular\u201d; and it is the word \u201cdated.\u201d (WEL, \u201cThe Well and the Shallows\u201d)<\/p>\n
What is totally intolerable is the idea that everybody must pretend, for the sake of peace and decorum, that moral inspiration only comes from secular things like Distributism, and cannot possibly come from spiritual things like Catholicism. (WEL, \u201cThe Don and the Cavalier\u201d)<\/p>\n
Skepticism (Religious); \u201cFreethinkers\u201d<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nOpponents of Christianity would believe anything except Christianity. (ILN, \u201cThe Neglect of Christmas,\u201d 1-13-06)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nFor example, one can hardly count the number of times that Christianity has been destroyed or might have been destroyed if its enemies had known where it was or anything about it. (ILN, \u201cCreed and Deed,\u201d 2-2-07)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nNobody supposes that the best critic of music is the man who talks coldly about music.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nBut there is an idea that a man is a correct judge of religion because he looks down on religions. <\/span><\/span>(ILN, \u201cThe History of Religions,\u201d 10-10-08)<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\nIf you are merely a sceptic, you must sooner or later ask yourself the question, \u201cWhy should anything<\/i> go right; even observation and deduction?<\/p>\n
But the old sceptic, the complete sceptic, says, \u201cI have no right to think for myself. I have no right to think at all.\u201d<\/p>\n
But the new sceptic is so humble that he doubts if he can even learn.<\/p>\n
As a politician, he will cry out that war is a waste of life, and then, as a philosopher, that all life is waste of time. (O, ch. 3)<\/p>\n
One rationalist had hardly done calling Christianity a nightmare before another began to call it a fool\u2019s paradise.<\/p>\n
It looked not so much as if Christianity was bad enough to include any vices, but rather as if any stick was good enough to beat Christianity with.<\/p>\n
But if this mass of mad contradictions really existed, quakerish and bloodthirsty, too gorgeous and too thread-bare, austere, yet pandering preposterously to the lust of the eye, the enemy of women and their foolish refuge, a solemn pessimist and a silly optimist, if this evil existed, then there was in this evil something quite supreme and unique.<\/p>\n
Perhaps, after all, it is Christianity that is sane and all its critics that are mad \u2014 in various ways. (O, ch. 6)<\/p>\n
Men who begin to fight the Church for the sake of freedom and humanity end by flinging away freedom and humanity if only they may fight the Church. (O, ch. 8)<\/p>\n
The sceptic is too credulous; he believes in newspapers or even in encyclopedias.<\/p>\n
The sceptic may truly be said to be topsy-turvy; for his feet are dancing upwards in idle ecstacies, while his brain is in the abyss. (O, ch. 9)<\/p>\n
Instead of trying to break up new fields with its plough, it simply tries to break up the plough. (ILN, \u201cHangmen and Capital Punishment,\u201d 2-6-09)<\/p>\n
I will not engage in verbal controversy with the sceptic, because long experience has taught me that the sceptic\u2019s ultimate skepticism is about the use of his own words and the reliability of his own intelligence. (ILN, \u201cObjections to Spiritualism,\u201d 10-30-09)<\/p>\n
It is the decisive people who have become civilised; it is the indecisive, otherwise called the higher sceptics, or the idealistic doubters, who have remained barbarians. (ILN, \u201cCivilization and Progress,\u201d 11-30-12)<\/p>\n
Moreover, while it is rare for a great legend to grow out of nothing, it is much easier for a sceptical theory to be woven out of nothing, or next to nothing. (ILN, \u201cThe Legends of Merlin,\u201d 9-8-23)<\/p>\n
But the people now calling themselves freethinkers are of all thinkers the least free.<\/p>\n
In order to explain the opinion of their opponents, they have to deny them the right to hold any opinion at all; and explain away all opinions by servile necessities of the hereditary mentality or the sub-conscious mind. (ILN, \u201cThe Reason For Fear,\u201d 2-27-26)<\/p>\n
What is now called free thought is valued, not because it is free thought, but because it is freedom from thought; because it is free thoughtlessness. (CCC, ch. 4)<\/p>\n
The person whose position is perpetually growing shaky, shifting, sliding, and breaking away from under him, is the advanced sceptic who is attacking the tradition of orthodoxy. (ILN, \u201cThe Crumbling of the Creeds,\u201d 11-26-27)<\/p>\n
To begin with, we can hardly be surprised if the Bible-Smasher had never read the Bible, because the Bible-Reader had never read the Bible either. (ILN, \u201cThe Bible and the Sceptics,\u201d 4-20-29)<\/p>\n
What I think has really happened, in the case of the more sophisticated youth of to-day, is that they have become skeptical of everything, including skepticism. (ILN, \u201cThe Sophistication \u2013 and Simplicity \u2013 of the Young,\u201d 5-18-29)<\/p>\n
The sceptic, like the schoolboy with a penknife, is always ready to start making a small crack in some of the planks of the platform of civilization; but he has not really the courage to split it from end to end. (ILN, \u201cMr. Darrow on Divorce,\u201d 10-19-29)<\/p>\n
For what strikes me most about the skeptics, who are praised as daring and audacious, is that they dare not carry out any of their own acts of audacity. (ILN, \u201cThe Modern Recoil From the Modern,\u201d 11-9-29)<\/p>\n
The truth is that the first questions asked by the sceptic sometimes have an air of intelligence; but if the sceptic has no answer, or only a negative answer, the silence that follows soon becomes the very negation of intelligence.<\/p>\n
In short, there came to be an entirely false association between intelligence and skepticism. (ILN, \u201cA Defense of Human Dignity,\u201d 2-22-30)<\/p>\n
How much longer are we expected to put up with people who have no arguments whatever, beyond the assertion that religion requires them to believe \u201cwhat no intelligent man can accept,\u201d or \u201cwhat thinking people can non longer regard as rational\u201d?<\/p>\n
But what are we to say of the superior philosophical sceptic, who can only begin the controversy by calling the other controversialist a fool, and in the same moment end the controversy because he need not controvert with fools? (ILN, \u201cThe Creeds and the Modernist,\u201d 5-17-30)<\/p>\n
There are very few sceptics in history who cannot be proved to have been instantly swallowed by some swollen convention or some hungry humbug of the hour, so that all their utterances about contemporary things now look to us almost pathetically contemporary. (WEL, \u201cThe Well and the Shallows\u201d)<\/p>\n
What has troubled me about sceptics all my life has been their extraordinary slowness in coming to the point; even to the point of their own position.<\/p>\n
I have heard them denounced, as well as admired, for their headlong haste and reckless rush of innovation; but my difficulty has always been to get them to move a few inches and finish their own argument. (A, ch. 16)<\/p>\n
Utopias<\/b><\/span><\/p>\nThe skeptical theorist is allowed to throw off Utopia after Utopia, and is never reproached when they are contradicted by the facts, or contradicted by each other. (ILN, \u201cBuddhism and Christianity,\u201d 3-2-29)<\/span><\/span><\/p>\nAbbreviations<\/strong><\/p>\nA<\/strong> Autobiography<\/em> (London: Hutchinson, 1936)<\/p>\nAD<\/b><\/span> Alarms And Discursions <\/i><\/span>(London: Methuen & Co., 1911)<\/span><\/p>\nAWD\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Apostle and the Wild Ducks <\/i><\/span>(London: Paul Elek, 1975)<\/span><\/p>\nCCC\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Catholic Church and Conversion <\/i><\/span>(London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne, 1926)<\/span><\/p>\nH <\/b><\/span>Heretics <\/i><\/span>(New York: John Lane Co., 1905)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXVII:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1905-1907<\/i><\/span> (edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1986)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXVIII:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1908-1910<\/i><\/span> (edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1987)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXIX:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1911-1913 <\/i><\/span>(edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXX:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1914-1916 <\/i><\/span>(edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1988)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXXIII:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1923-1925<\/i><\/span> (edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1990)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXXIV:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1926-1928<\/i><\/span> (edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1991)<\/span><\/p>\nILN\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Collected Works of G. K. Chesterton: Volume XXXV:<\/i><\/span> The Illustrated London News<\/span>: 1929-1931<\/i><\/span> (edited by Lawrence J. Clipper; general editors: George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin, and John L. Swan; San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1991)<\/span><\/p>\nNJ<\/b><\/span> The New Jerusalem <\/i><\/span>(London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1920)<\/span><\/p>\nO\u00a0<\/b><\/span>Orthodoxy <\/i><\/span>(New York: John Lane Co., 1908)<\/span><\/p>\nTRE<\/b><\/span> Tremendous Trifles <\/i><\/span>(London: Methuen & Co., 1909)<\/span><\/p>\nTT\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Thing: Why I am a Catholic <\/i><\/span>(New York: Sheed & Ward, 1929)<\/span><\/p>\nUTO\u00a0<\/b><\/span>Utopia of Usurers, and Other Essays<\/i><\/span> (New York: Boni & Liveright, 1917)<\/span><\/p>\nWEL\u00a0<\/b><\/span>The Well and The Shallows <\/i><\/span>(New York: Sheed & Ward, 1935)<\/span><\/p>\nWWW\u00a0<\/b><\/span>What\u2019s Wrong With the World <\/i><\/span>(London: Cassell, 1910)<\/span><\/p>\n\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Caricature of G.K. Chesterton by David Low (1928) [public domain \/ Wikimedia Commons]\u00a0 * * * Quotations from my book, The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton (2009) * * * * * \u00a0 Agnosticism When he drops one doctrine after another in a refined scepticism, when he declines to tie himself to a system, when he […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":4822,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[124,1505],"tags":[267,258,1558,2367,1556,477,1557,298,345,763,1559],"class_list":["post-4821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-atheism-agnosticism","category-g-k-chesterton","tag-agnosticism","tag-atheism","tag-determinism","tag-g-k-chesterton","tag-intelligentsia","tag-materialism","tag-science-religion","tag-scientism","tag-secularism","tag-skepticism","tag-utopianism"],"yoast_head":"\n
G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Quotations from my book, "The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Quotations from my book, "The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-24T21:13:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-24T23:40:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/11\/GKC85PD.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"384\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"599\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html\",\"name\":\"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-24T21:13:58+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-24T23:40:59+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"Quotations from my book, \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton\\\" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.","description":"Quotations from my book, \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton\" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.","og_description":"Quotations from my book, \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton\" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2015-11-24T21:13:58+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-24T23:40:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":384,"height":599,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/11\/GKC85PD.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html","name":"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-11-24T21:13:58+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-24T23:40:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"Quotations from my book, \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton\" (2009) on atheism, skepticism, secularism, science, and related areas.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/g-k-chesterton-on-atheism-skepticism-etc.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"G. K. Chesterton on Atheism, Skepticism, Secularism, Etc."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4821\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4822"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"GKC85(PD)\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2015\/11\/GKC85PD.jpg\")
<\/a><\/p>\n