![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2020\/06\/BlackLivesMatter.jpg\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Photo credit:<\/strong> \u201cBlack Lives Matter\u201d: four African-Americans murdered by rioters (oftentimes African-American themselves<\/em>), who are supposedly looting and killing over the outrage they feel about George Floyd\u2019s death. Makes a lot of sense<\/em>, doesn\u2019t it?: \u201cWe\u2019re \u2018protesting\u2019 the unjust murder of a black man by murdering black men.\u201d David Dorn was a 77-year-old former police chief. He was murdered by a rabid, insane mob for trying to prevent looting. The rioters scornfully laughed and chanted \u201cblack lives matter\u201d as he bled to death on the ground.<\/span><\/p>\n ***<\/p>\n Pete Vere<\/a> is a friend of mine, and is an [Eastern]\u00a0Catholic author<\/a>, canon lawyer, and ecumenist. He calls himself a political \u201cconservative\u201d; so do I (though with several important qualifications and clarifications<\/a>). The following comes from several exchanges on my Facebook page. His words will be in blue<\/span>. Words of Liz Perez<\/a> will be in green<\/span>.<\/p>\n *****<\/p>\n [I posted an article about former President George W. Bush\u2019s response to the killing of George Floyd<\/a> by Minneapolis police, and its implications for race relations and equal justice for all in America.]<\/p>\n President Bush has now posted the entire text to his presidential website. I don\u2019t want to politicize the discussion, but I found it very heartfelt, candid, and imbued with Christian spirit at a time when people are hurting.\u00a0I would definitely recommend reading the whole text. I was going to quote a paragraph or two, but the entire text is worth quoting.<\/span> [link<\/a>]<\/p>\n I made my view about the killing of George Floyd very clear in my article,\u00a0George Floyd: Atheist & Christian Agree; but What\u2019s the Solution?<\/a> (6-4-20). I am 100% opposed to it, and am glad that all four officers have now been indicted<\/a>. I wrote about that:<\/p>\n I\u2019m in favor of this development.\u00a0I have yet to find anyone<\/em><\/strong> of any<\/strong><\/em> political persuasion who defends this action (which I say is murder) against George Floyd. If anyone finds a case of agreement from anyone who is not a KKK wacko (where such a view would be expected), please let me know. [no one has, as of this writing]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n [I put up a meme of looters fleeing from the store they had just looted<\/a>; two with smiles on their faces. The text read: \u201cMinneapolis protesters in mourning over Floyd\u2019s death.\u201d I fully agree that the protesters and looters are different groups, however, and disagree with the terminology used in the meme. I would have put \u201cprotesters\u201d in quotation marks.]<\/p>\n You are the third pro-life Catholic apologist I have seen share this meme. So this isn\u2019t just you to whom my comments are directed. This is the type of meme that, when circulated, makes conservatives, pro-lifers, and Catholics look bad.<\/span><\/p>\n There have been documented cases of looters from every race and ethnic background. Yet this meme chooses a photo that uniquely pictures looters from one particular racial minority\u2013a community that is in extreme shock and pain right now, and who former President George W Bush (a pro-life, conservative, and Christian president) has asked the nation to reach out to, and listen to.<\/span><\/p>\n I would ask anyone tempted to circulate this meme to ask themselves one question: If I were pregnant teenager from a minority community, and I came across this meme on your Facebook page because I was contemplating abortion, what would I conclude from seeing this meme? Would I reach out to you?<\/span><\/p>\n Not trying to condemn anyone here or point the finger, but I am very uncomfortable with this meme as a pro-life Catholic and political conservative. I feel it is not in the spirit of how Pope Francis and President Bush have asked us to respond to this crisis.<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s because I don\u2019t think in terms of liberal categories, as you do, and have been trained to do. I think in terms of morally good and bad, and I am colorblind, just as Martin Luther King urged us to be. These acts are morally bad. I didn\u2019t even notice<\/em>\u00a0that they were all black, because in my mind that was an irrelevant consideration.<\/p>\n If I show a picture of all white Nazis in the 40s, killing Jews, is that saying all white people are bad, or Nazis? Obviously it can\u2019t be, because the victims were white, too.<\/p>\n No. It\u2019s embarrassing and an insult to my intelligence and everyone\u2019s who is reading, to have to point out elementary things. But I have to because even self-described conservatives like you have been brainwashed to think in irrational liberal categories.<\/p>\n Keep up comments like this and I will either put \u201cNo comments please\u201d on every political meme I put up, or delete \u201cliberalthink\u201d comments.<\/p>\n If you are approaching this meme in terms of morally good and bad, then I would ask two questions:<\/span><\/p>\n 1 \u2013 What is morally good about this meme?<\/span><\/p>\n 2 \u2013 Is the pursuit of this moral good worth turning away audiences who might view this meme differently?<\/span><\/p>\n President Bush is a practicing Christian, a pro-lifer, and a political conservative. And he has spoken both boldly and prophetically\u2013not just to the nation-at-large, but to us specifically as politically-active conservatives.<\/span><\/p>\n How does the messaging of this meme compare to the message of President Bush?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Again, the meme has nothing to do with what President Bush said. I was the one who put up an article about the speech by President Bush. You were impressed and went and found the whole thing. I totally agree with it.<\/p>\n This meme is not about all that. I have continually condemned the murder of George Floyd and have called for police reform and have endorsed peaceful<\/strong><\/em> protest (I said I would even march in one). I have put up memes about how most policemen are good people, and serve the community. I have also constantly condemned rioting and exploitation of protests, and looting. None of these views exclude the others. They are all completely harmonious and consistent.<\/p>\n Riots and looting and murder have nothing to do with respecting black people and their communities and desires, etc. To the extent that black people loot and riot and burn and kill (along with many white Antifa types, etc.), they are not helping the black community, nor its image, nor the memory of Floyd and the desire for any racist policing to be stopped forever.<\/p>\n So you ask, \u201chow does it compare?\u201d It\u2019s apples and oranges. Bush condemned the violence as well (in two sentences; but he did):<\/p>\n \u201cWe know that lasting justice will only come by peaceful means. Looting is not liberation, and destruction is not progress.\u201d<\/p>\n So this meme is identical to those two sentences. The rest is about a different topic (and I agree).<\/p>\n I love what President Bush said (which is why I linked to him saying it!): it\u2019s an eloquent and moving statement of conservative \/ Rev. King-inspired (which is Christianity-inspired) anti-racism and justice and equality of a sort that I have passionately held to my entire life.<\/p>\n If Democrats would just stop regarding conservatives en masse<\/em> as a bunch of racists, that would be huge progress itself. We don\u2019t improve race relations by lying about scores of millions of people, and falsely accusing them of racism, simply because we disagree with them regarding political solutions to problems.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n You wrote:<\/span> \u201cBush condemned the violence as well (in two sentences; but he did).\u201d<\/p>\n Exactly.<\/span><\/p>\n One sentence midway<\/span> [two] through a six-paragraph statement.<\/span><\/p>\n He devotes the majority of his attention to (1) mourning the death of Mr Floyd, (2) acknowledging the historical wrongs against the African-American community and the legitimacy of their hurts and frustrations, (3) and he urges the rest of the country to really listen to the African-American community before we work together to fix the problem.<\/span><\/p>\n Now let\u2019s look at the sentence where President Bush rightfully condemns looting: \u201cLooting is not liberation, and destruction is not progress.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n One is immediate struck by the tone. It is serious, not sarcastic. And in a time of deep pain and division not just in America, his condemnation of the looting and violence uses words that are presidential rather than polemical.<\/span><\/p>\n The contrast between President Bush\u2019s condemnation of looters, and this meme\u2019s condemnation of the same, is especially striking when one considers Bush\u2019s words within the context of the full paragraph in which they appear:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n I know some of our mutual friends now condemn President Bush as a liberal. Personally, while I did not agree with him on everything, I continue to respect him as an elder statesman who is consistently conservative, pro-life, and Christian. I also agree fully with both the content and the tone of his statement responding to the current crisis.<\/span><\/p>\n Christians, pro-lifers, and conservatives would do well to listen to his words, and emulate his example.<\/span><\/p>\n If one has listened to President Bush\u2019s words and taken them to heart, can one truly state this meme emulates his example?<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n Not disputing your pro-life activism\u2013you even have a good decade on me! Nor asking you to shut up about it. Rather, I am trying to discern whether it is a pro-life message or mere partisan polemic.<\/span><\/p>\n *<\/p>\n I follow your explanation of the sentence\u2019s first phrase, which you explain in your first paragraph. You make a good case that it\u2019s pro-life.\u00a0It\u2019s the second phrase I find confusing, or overtly partisan and polemical so as to distract from the message of the first phrase.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n If you\u2019re gonna riot, supposedly because of the death of one black man (I deny that most who are rioting are doing so primarily for that reason; legitimate protesters are different), then you would certainly also riot over 900 black babies being ruthlessly murdered every day.<\/p>\n This is not rocket science, Pete. You\u2019re an intelligent man. You can figure out an analogy and a reductio ad absurdum<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n With an elected democracy, I would state all political viewpoints matter. Conservative viewpoints matter. Liberal viewpoints matter. Libertarian viewpoints matter. Green viewpoints matter. Moderate\/ Centrist\/ Independent viewpoints matter.<\/span><\/p>\n It\u2019s the \u201cnew<\/em> pro-life\u201d or \u201cleftist pro-life\u201d mentality that I have been critiquing for many years now<\/a>. This meme is expressing two concerns at once: concern for black lives and concern for aborted babies\u2019 lives: in this case, black<\/em> babies, which are 28% of those murdered every day, on average.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n What I am less clear about in terms of the meme\u2019s messaging is the following: How does rioting relate to the two concerns you expressed? Is it important enough to draw attention to in this meme, or should the focus be kept on the other two concerns?<\/span><\/p>\n I\u2019ve been passionately concerned about race relations and racial justice since 1967 and about the right to life of babies since 1982 when I came to my senses on that issue. I express both here.<\/p>\n Yet you protest it. Somehow by being concerned for the lives of aborted black babies I am sending a message that I care little about the concerns of black<\/em> people???!!! That makes less<\/em> than no<\/strong><\/em> sense at all.<\/p>\n I think I understand where Pete is coming from. We want to build bridges not walls. The moment a liberal person sees this meme instead of thinking\u2026 \u2018wow yes I\u2019ve been mistaken, I\u2019m here protesting the life of a man with a past, yet I don\u2019t even think about the 900 innocent black babies that are aborted daily, I\u2019m such a hypocrite\u2019. No, they wont be thinking this at all because abortion is not an immediate concern to them. Instead they will feel \u2018unheard\u2019 in their cause. And they will feel as if we are deflecting from the problem at hand and that we who stand for \u2018life\u2019 are the ones being hypocrites and bringing in our own agendas. That\u2019s the perception that I think Pete is referring to.<\/span><\/p>\n We as pro-lifers understand that, yes, it may be hypocritical that thousands everywhere are protesting one unjust death, but never protest the aborted babies. But this meme is not the answer to get them to \u2018hear\u2019 us (if that\u2019s your audience). But if like-minded people are your target audience then this meme may do wonders to get our<\/em><\/strong> own indignant monster fed. We<\/strong><\/em> have been rewarded by the likes and the shares. But no one from the other side has been touched. And not one additional unborn life will have been saved.<\/span><\/p>\n This meme will simply turn them away and close their hearts to us. They will view us as cold and uncaring even if that was not our intention. We can have the best of intentions, but if we do not speak their \u2018language\u2019 nor understand where they are coming from, there is no way to even begin a conversation about abortion or the hypocrisy.<\/span><\/p>\n There\u2019s a time and place for those conversation (after<\/em><\/strong> you have established a relationship with the other), but not now, not when our society is aching and crying out in pain. They are people too and we as pro-lifers, need to put aside our<\/em><\/strong> \u2018outrage\u2019 and our<\/em><\/strong> \u2018indignation\u2019 and offer up that moment when we hold back from posting what feels good. We have to practice a little mortification of our emotions, rid ourselves from our religious pride and come down to a level where others can see us and sense our compassion and not<\/em> <\/strong>our criticism of them by \u2018guilting\u2019 them or \u2018shaming\u2019 them by \u2018using\u2019 these babies bodies as a pawn. When we put aside our indignation and criticism and \u2018hear\u2019 them, only then can their hearts be opened. And that is done not with a meme, but one on one, with various conversations and allowing the Holy Spirit to work through us. And sometimes it may take years. And that is why this meme is not a good pro-life message.<\/span><\/p>\n I too have been aching to share this picture and to \u2018give in\u2019 to that angry part of me that sees the hypocrisy. But I know<\/em><\/strong> that the moment I do, I will alienate my good friend who\u2019s a liberal and I\u2019ve been building up a relationship with her and \u2018guiding\u2019 her through Catholicism. But if I give in to my emotions and share this, I will lose everything I have been building up with her, because I know exactly what she will think of me. It will turn her off and turn her away from me. And that\u2019s not what we are about. We are not about burning bridges and giving in to what feels good. We are about saving souls inside and outside the womb.<\/span><\/p>\n I am not commenting because I feel I am oh so enlightened. I\u2019m writing from experience, because I, too want to set \u2018them\u2019 straight and \u2018defend\u2019 the unborn, and \u2018expose\u2019 their hypocrisy. And I too have given into the pride of posting \u2018in your face\u2019 memes, and calling the other side \u2018the leftist mob\u2019 and it feels good at the moment and it feels righteous and even better when we get likes and our friends repost and our point is proven. But are we really exposing their<\/em> <\/strong>hypocrisy??? Or our<\/em><\/strong> hypocrisy? I can sometimes recognize in me, slowly creeping in, slowing creating the \u2018them vs us\u2019 divisions. We tend to become victims of that which we criticize in others and then become blinded to it by the enemy. I\u2019m still learning how to overcome my own religious pride and indignation and \u2018be\u2019 present with those I disagree with, with those that oppose what I know to be good, true and beautiful. It\u2019s a journey. And we are all in it together. You are blessed to have a friend who can stand up to you and call it out. That\u2019s a friend who cares about your soul.<\/span> [comment \u201cliked\u201d by Pete Vere]<\/p>\n Thanks for your articulate exposition of this point of view. I respectfully disagree and have written about this sort of thing many times<\/a> (its the so-called \u201cold\u201d vs, so-called \u201cnew\u201d pro-life debate), but I do understand what you are saying.\u00a0I think sometimes we have to offend people; that we can\u2019t always be touchy-feely and tell people what they want to hear.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also different sitting in your living room by a fire, talking to a trusted friend, with whom you are building trust, and speaking to a broad audience in a public forum: vastly<\/em> different. With a close friend, I would almost always act just as you recommend. St. Paul said, \u201cI have become all things to all men.\u201d<\/p>\n There is a time for everything. But there is a reason why Jesus said \u201cyou will be hated by all for my name\u2019s sake.\u201d Why do you think that is<\/em>, Liz? What is it about us that they hate, and what was it about Jesus<\/em> that made Him<\/em> so despised and hated (and murdered)? We know it wasn\u2019t sin in His case. Is it always<\/em> because we Christians are rotten hypocrites and unfeeling jerks that we are so hated, as Jesus said we would be?<\/p>\n But what is the point of posting something that will alienate another? Posting this meme isn\u2019t going to get the point across is it? I doubt that the message you\u2019re intending is getting through to the other person. And it is surely not helping the unborn child. In fact I would dare say it\u2019s only making others dig in their heels more. Having people \u2018hate\u2019 us isn\u2019t necessarily the prize or the goal here. When we follow Christ there are those that will \u2018hate us\u2019 because of our lifestyle and what we believe in and stand for. But that\u2019s different than being hated for provoking others and shaming them for what they aren\u2019t caring about. And aren\u2019t you assuming that those that are protesting this death do not at all care about the unborn? How do you know they aren\u2019t at the \u2018march for life\u2019 as well?<\/span><\/p>\n A picture is indeed worth 1000 words and can work both ways\u2026 Even though you have extensively written about how much you do care about black lives, this meme at this time may give others the perfection that you care about the 900 unborn babies, but not about this one black life that was ended at this moment in time.<\/span><\/p>\n Also in this scenario you may be \u2018hated\u2019 because you will be perceived as a hypocrite, not necessarily \u2018hated\u2019 for speaking the truth or following Christ or standing up for what is right.<\/span><\/p>\n Did you watch Unplanned<\/em>? This reminds me of the moment Abbey Johnson was won over not by the screaming protesters with the graphic pictures but by the one who reached out to her in love and compassion without any of the emotional provoking graphic pictures.<\/span><\/p>\n Are you against showing pictures of the Jews starving in the concentration camps, too? Or the photos of the Nazis murdering victims at mass grave sites? Or drowned illegal immigrant children? How about starving children in many parts of Africa or Christians massacred by the Muslims in Nigeria or the Sudan? You oppose all that on the same grounds, too?<\/p>\n Do you oppose showing pictures of black people being lynched and burned to death, or the ones that show the backs of slaves torn to bits by whips? How about the famous videos where the racist police in the South set the dogs on peaceful black protesters and blasted them with fire hoses? Or the body of Emmett Till, the 14-year-old who was tortured and murdered by white supremacists in Mississippi in 1955?<\/p>\n From an article about the latter<\/a>:<\/p>\n The National Museum of African American History and Culture considered Till\u2019s mother\u2019s decision to make the world see her son when they decided to include his casket among its exhibits, which also include a pair of shackles so small that they must have belonged to an enslaved child.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat this museum is going to do is make sure that America remembers that, at one point \u2014 and unfortunately some of that still goes on \u2014 we killed our children,\u201d said Kinshasha Holman Conwill, the museum\u2019s deputy director.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The Wikipedia article on Emmett Till<\/a> described the influence of the horrific photograph of his mangled face:<\/p>\n Mamie Till Bradley . . . had insisted on an open-casket funeral. Images of Till\u2019s body, printed in\u00a0The Chicago Defender<\/a><\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0Jet<\/a><\/i>\u00a0magazine, made international news and directed attention to the lack of rights of blacks in the U.S. South. . . .<\/p>\n She decided to have an\u00a0open-casket funeral, saying, \u201cThere was just no way I could describe what was in that box. No way. And I just wanted the world to see.\u201d\u00a0Tens of thousands of people lined the street outside the mortuary to view Till\u2019s body, and days later thousands more attended his funeral at Roberts Temple Church of God in Christ.<\/p>\n Photographs of his mutilated corpse circulated around the country, . . . generating intense public reaction. According to\u00a0The Nation<\/i>\u00a0and\u00a0Newsweek<\/i>, Chicago\u2019s black community was \u201caroused as it has not been over any similar act in recent history.\u201d\u00a0Time<\/a><\/i>\u00a0later selected one of the\u00a0Jet<\/i>\u00a0photographs showing Mamie Till over the mutilated body of her dead son, as one of the 100 \u201cmost influential images of all time\u201d: \u201cFor almost a century, African Americans were lynched with regularity and impunity. Now, thanks to a mother\u2019s determination to expose the barbarousness of the crime, the public could no longer pretend to ignore what they couldn\u2019t see.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\nSometimes people don\u2019t accept truth. It doesn\u2019t mean we don\u2019t say it in any instance. Sometimes we are misunderstood or hated when we speak it. If that\u2019s the choice, and it\u2019s necessary to speak it, then we do at whatever cost rather than become man-pleasers and butt-kissers.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\nToday everything is subjective and relative. That\u2019s the nature of postmodernism. Christianity is primarily objective and absolute truths.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\nThe meme makes the point that \u201cthese riots (and looting) have nothing<\/em> <\/strong>to do with George Floyd.\u201d And they aren\u2019t mourning him if they are stealing and smiling about it.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nYou state \u201cI am colorblind\u2026\u201d<\/span>\u00a0If you are colorblind, how can you see this meme\u2019s message?<\/span><\/div>\n\n\n\n\n
Many doubt the justice of our country, and with good reason. Black people see the repeated violation of their rights without an urgent and adequate response from American institutions. We know that lasting justice will only come by peaceful means. Looting is not liberation, and destruction is not progress. But we also know that lasting peace in our communities requires truly equal justice. The rule of law ultimately depends on the fairness and legitimacy of the legal system. And achieving justice for all is the duty of all.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\nDunno where else to go with this, Pete. I agree with the meme, and I agree with President Bush. There is no contradiction here. You have a different impression because, in my opinion, it\u2019s an instance where you have learned to think like liberals do (in an area where they are mistaken). I don\u2019t think like a liberal anymore. I used to in the 70s. Now I think like an orthodox Catholic, who accepts all of Catholic social teaching.<\/div>\n*<\/div>\n\nCarlos A Morales<\/a> chimed in:<\/div>\n\n
I have seen photos and videos with people of all\u00a0races looting and rioting, where I saw the meme, I agreed completely with it, I did not see only black people, I did not notice they were all black. The idea behind the meme stands firm in what its says, people of all races are mourning the death of George Floyd peacefully, people of all races are outraged at how he was murdered. The people in this photo are not mourning, are not protesting his murder, the people in this photo are lawless opportunists looting and destroying. Whether the person who produced this meme chose it because it only showed black people to insert a racist tone or not is not for us to judge, we are not in his head, we don\u2019t know.\u00a0You immediately saw color; that\u2019s all liberal leaning people look for and see.<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n[I put up a meme<\/a> that stated, \u201c900 black babies a day can\u2019t breathe, but no one cares to riot for their injustice. It shows an aborted \/ murdered black baby, held in a hand (about as big as the hand), with the caption, \u201cI can\u2019t breathe.\u201d]<\/div>\n*<\/div>\nAs a pro-life Catholic I am not sure what message this meme is suppose to convey.\u00a0Is the message supposed to be a universal pro-life message?\u00a0<\/span>Or is it supposed to be partisan and political?<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\nWhat is to not<\/strong><\/em> understand about it? 900 black babies a day (out of about 3000 total in the US) are being murdered. They are human beings. Therefore, they are part of \u201cblack lives matter.\u201d\u00a0I am a pro-life activist, first and foremost. I have been since 1982 and I will never shut up about it, no matter how unfashionable or un-chic it is.<\/div>\n*<\/div>\n\n\nIs the message about babies, or about rioting? Or about racially-motivated police brutality against African-Americans?\u00a0That is where the meme\u2019s messaging confuses me.<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\nI just explained it. I don\u2019t know what else to say.<\/div>\n*<\/div>\nAm I wrong for believing a pro-life meme should leave me thinking about children in the womb?\u00a0This one mentions the unborn, then shifts focus to rioting, before ending with police brutality against racial minorities.\u00a0Come to think about it, it doesn\u2019t even\u00a0mention abortion unless you click on the small print below.<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\n\u00a0\u201cA picture speaks a thousand words.\u201d<\/div>\n*<\/div>\nEven with the photo there is still too much mixed messaging to tell me what the message is.\u00a0Worse, to someone unfamiliar with the history or context of the pro-life movement\u2019s principled emphasis on peaceful and non-violent forms of protest only, a person might even mistake the meme as suggesting pro-life activists riot for an end to abortion.\u00a0This is another reason why the meme fails. The focus here is not the unborn.<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\nMy friend Margie Prox Sindelar<\/a> (on whose page I saw the meme), added:<\/div>\n\n
I posted this on several pages and it seems you are the only one so far who doesn\u2019t get it. It\u2019s about hypocrisy: the outrage over one black man, while justified [vs.] the silence of black babies being aborted at these kind of rates. Look at the likes<\/a> [1,400], shares [2,100], comments. Everyone gets it; why don\u2019t you<\/em>?<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\nPerhaps others don\u2019t get it either, but being a pro-life Catholic and a political conservative, I am the only one to speak up?\u00a0What I am asking you to consider here is other people\u2019s perceptions.<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\nThey are perceptions of liberals (including pro-abort liberals): how they look at things. That\u2019s why we are clashing, and this is my point: in these respects you have learned how to think like a liberal and are more concerned about pleasing\u00a0them and getting their approval, than about pro-life ethical principles and getting the message out about mass genocide.<\/div>\n*
\nCurious. Yesterday I was was told that I had learned to think like a conservative, and was more concerned about seeking their approval, than about correcting injustice and getting out the message of racial injustice, because I spoke against condoning violence as a form of protest. In fact, I even quoted BLM criticism of Antifa on that topic.<\/span><\/div>\n*<\/div>\n\nAs a traditional Catholic, I would agree with each of those two concerns.<\/span><\/div>\n\n\nLastly, you don\u2019t understand the very purpose of showing photos of aborted children. The purpose is not to convince a woman intent on killing her child, or the enabling men around her, to not commit the evil act. It almost always won\u2019t<\/em> have that effect, as you say. You\u2019re right.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\nThe purpose is to reveal the injustice and evil of abortion to the world,<\/em> just as the photo of the tortured and murdered Emmett Till was not going to convert the murdering racists who did this to him. It was to show the world the outrageous injustice that was being perpetrated on African-Americans in the 1950s. And that was exactly the right thing to do.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\nPhotos or videos of ISIS beheadings do not convert ISIS terrorists. They reveal their terrorism to the world.<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\u00a0<\/span><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n