{"id":50171,"date":"2020-07-26T20:08:55","date_gmt":"2020-07-27T00:08:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=50171"},"modified":"2020-07-26T21:15:17","modified_gmt":"2020-07-27T01:15:17","slug":"reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html","title":{"rendered":"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-50173\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2020\/07\/HeavenGates.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"640\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"color: #0000ff; font-size: medium;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20060117034657\/http:\/\/members.aol.com\/jasonte2\/law.htm\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security<\/a><\/span>\u00a0(aka, \u201cWhy Christians Cannot Lose Their Salvation\u201d). It was written, c. December 1998. Jason\u2019s words will be in <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">blue<\/span>. I will cite his entire paper in replying to it. Jason is notorious for picking and choosing what he will reply to in opponents\u2019 material (sometimes even ignoring the vast majority of material). Not me; I generally offer a point-by-point refutation. When I cite Scripture, I will use the RSV.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*****<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Why were the apostles sure that they would go to Heaven, even though they still had time to sin (2 Timothy 4:18, 1 Peter 5:1, 2 John 2-3)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">2 Timothy 4:18 is from St. Paul, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2019\/03\/st-paul-on-falling-away-from-grace-and-salvation.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><em>also<\/em> offers many passages<\/a> in which he appears quite <em>unsure<\/em> that he (or any given Christian) will be eschatologically saved (i.e., will go to heaven), and states that believers (including himself: 1 Cor 9:27; Phil 3:8-14)\u00a0 must remain vigilant to do so (1 Cor 10:12; Gal 5:1). Thus, the two <em>types<\/em> of passages need to be <em>harmonized<\/em> with each other somehow. Calvinists and eternal security advocates think they can answer our \u201ccounter-verses\u201d and we believe that we can answer their alleged prooftexts. Paul specifically states that some believers have \u201cfallen away from grace\u201d (Gal 5:4), and in his first letter to Timothy proclaims:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b class=\"calibre14\">1 Timothy 4:1\u00a0<\/b>Now the Spirit expressly says that in later times some will depart from the faith by giving heed to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Likewise, St. Peter writes in his other epistle:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>2 Peter 2:15, 20-22\u00a0<\/strong>Forsaking the right way they have gone astray; they have followed the way of Balaam, the son of Be\u2019or, who loved gain from wrongdoing, . . . [20]\u00a0For if, after they have escaped the defilements of the world through the knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they are again entangled in them and overpowered, the last state has become worse for them than the first.\u00a0[21] For it would have been better for them never to have known the way of righteousness than after knowing it to turn back from the holy commandment delivered to them. [22] It has happened to them according to the true proverb, The dog turns back to his own vomit, and the sow is washed only to wallow in the mire.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It seems to me that Paul and Peter in the passages Jason cites are thinking in terms of <em>present possession<\/em> of salvation and being in God\u2019s good grace, provided they <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2018\/03\/examination-conscience-biblical-pauline-evidence.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">examine themselves<\/a> and are not in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/mortal-venial-sin-strong-biblical-support.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">mortal sin<\/a> that can separate them from God. But that\u2019s just it: that situation can possibly <em>change<\/em> in the future.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">As for St. John, he <em>often<\/em> speaks in a proverbial or idealistic genre. So, for example, he writes:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 John 3:6\u00a0<\/strong>No one who abides in him sins; no one who sins has either seen him or known him.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 John 3:9<\/strong>\u00a0No one born of God commits sin; for God\u2019s nature abides in him, and he cannot sin because he is born of God.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But then he<em> also<\/em> writes (in a much more practical and \u201crealistic\u201d vein):<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 John 1:8-10<\/strong>\u00a0If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.\u00a0[9] If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness.\u00a0[10] If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Why did the apostles want the believers to whom they wrote to be sure of\u00a0<em>their<\/em>\u00a0future in Heaven (Romans 5:9, 1 Corinthians 1:8, Philippians 3:20-21, 1 Peter 1:3-5, 5:4, 1 John 5:13, 2 John 2-3)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Pauline passages have to be synthesized and understood in the context of this passage:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Colossians 1:22-23<\/strong>\u00a0he has now reconciled in his body of flesh by his death, in order to present you holy and blameless and irreproachable before him,\u00a0[23] <strong><em>provided<\/em><\/strong> that you<strong><em> continue<\/em> <\/strong>in the faith, stable and steadfast, not shifting from the hope of the gospel which you heard, which has been preached to every creature under heaven, . . .<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Paul warns the Corinthians against falling away twice in the same book (1 Cor 9:27; 10:12). Pete likewise warns in the same chapter 1 of his first epistle:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 Peter 1:14, 17\u00a0<\/strong>As obedient children, do not be conformed to the passions of your former ignorance, . . .\u00a0[17] And if you invoke as Father him who judges each one impartially according to his deeds, conduct yourselves with fear throughout the time of your exile.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The <em>context<\/em> of 1 Peter 5:4 is a number of <em>conditional promises<\/em> (very common in Scripture): \u201c<em>if<\/em> you do<em> x<\/em>, <em>then<\/em> you will receive <em>y<\/em>\u201c. These, of course, involved works, or merit (which are always grace-enabled, yet we must agree in our will to <em>do<\/em> them):<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 Peter 5:2-4, 6, 8-10\u00a0<\/strong>Tend the flock of God that is your charge, not by constraint but willingly, not for shameful gain but eagerly,\u00a0[3] not as domineering over those in your charge but being examples to the flock.\u00a0[4] And when the chief Shepherd is manifested you will obtain the unfading crown of glory. . . . [6] Humble yourselves therefore under the mighty hand of God, that in due time he may exalt you.\u00a0 . . . [8]\u00a0Be sober, be watchful. Your adversary the devil prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking some one to devour.\u00a0[9] Resist him, firm in your faith, knowing that the same experience of suffering is required of your brotherhood throughout the world.\u00a0[10] And after you have suffered a little while, the God of all grace, who has called you to his eternal glory in Christ, will himself restore, establish, and strengthen you.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I devoted an article to 1 John 5:13:<\/span>\u00a0<a class=\"decorated-link decorated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/09\/certainty-of-eternal-life-1-jn-513-jn-524.html\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cCertainty\u201d of Eternal Life? (1 Jn 5:13 &amp; Jn 5:24)<\/a>. <span style=\"color: #000000;\">2 John 2-3 was already dealt with above.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It\u2019s obvious, then, that if we are <em>required<\/em> to <em>do<\/em> certain things in order to be saved in the end (Matthew 25 \u2014 about the judgment \u2014\u00a0 affirms this over and over), then if we don\u2019t do them, we could <em>lose<\/em> the salvation and good standing in God\u2019s grace that we have. See also my paper,<\/span>\u00a0<a class=\"decorated-link decorated-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/final-judgment-works-not-faith-50-passages.html\" target=\"_blank\">Final Judgment &amp;\u00a0<em>Works<\/em>\u00a0(Not Faith): 50 Passages<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Critics of eternal security argue that salvation depends on our\u00a0<em>present<\/em>\u00a0faith and our\u00a0<em>present\u00a0<\/em>behavior. Why, then, do the scriptures refer to people having salvation, or something associated with salvation, in the\u00a0<em>present<\/em>\u00a0because of a\u00a0<em>past\u00a0<\/em>faith or a\u00a0<em>past<\/em>\u00a0justification (Luke 7:50, Acts 19:2, Romans 5:1)? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Because<em> at that time<\/em> they<em> do<\/em> have it: meaning that if they died at that instant, they would go to heaven. What\u2019s not certain is that they will never reject God or fall away in the <em>future<\/em>. The same Gospel of Luke contains the parable of the sower (Lk 8:5-8). Jesus\u2019 explanation of it includes the notion of believers falling away:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Luke 8:13-14<\/strong>\u00a0And the ones on the rock are those who, when they hear the word, receive it with joy; but these have no root, they believe for a while and in time of temptation fall away.\u00a0[14] And as for what fell among the thorns, they are those who hear, but as they go on their way they are choked by the cares and riches and pleasures of life, and their fruit does not mature.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Acts 19:2 refers to receiving the Holy Spirit. But in Hebrews it\u2019s revealed that we can <em>lose<\/em> the Holy Spirit:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Hebrews 6:4-8<\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, and have become partakers of the Holy Spirit,\u00a0[5] and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come,\u00a0[6] if they then commit apostasy, since they crucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.\u00a0[7] For land which has drunk the rain that often falls upon it, and brings forth vegetation useful to those for whose sake it is cultivated, receives a blessing from God.\u00a0[8] But if it bears thorns and thistles, it is worthless and near to being cursed; its end is to be burned.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">How is this possible if there\u00a0<em>isn\u2019t<\/em>\u00a0a moment of faith in the\u00a0<em>past<\/em>\u00a0that results in our\u00a0<em>future<\/em>\u00a0salvation?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We don\u2019t deny that. We only deny that such a moment is good for all time or that it cannot be reversed by our free will decision to forsake God and salvation.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Why do the scriptures say that salvation is a free gift of God\u2019s grace (Romans 3:24, 5:17, 6:23, Revelation 22:17)? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">No one denies that. To do so is the heresy Pelagianism.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If\u00a0<em>attaining<\/em>\u00a0salvation through works would contradict grace (Romans 4:4, 11:6), then how can\u00a0<em>maintaining\u00a0<\/em>salvation through works be consistent with grace? If I give you a car, and tell you that it\u2019s a \u201cfree gift\u201d, but then I send you monthly bills for it thereafter, was the car really a \u201cfree gift\u201d?<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>We don\u2019t attain it through works. But works are the inevitable fruit of genuine faith (as both Luther and Calvin affirmed) and show that the faith isn\u2019t dead, per the book of James:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him? (James 2:14; RSV)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">So faith itself, if it has no works, is dead. (James 2:17; cf. 2:20, 2:26)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. (James 2:24)<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Therefore, if we don\u2019t see such works, we know that saving faith is not present, either. That\u2019s why works play such a prominent role in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/final-judgment-works-not-faith-50-passages.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">50 passages that refer to God\u2019s judgment<\/a> and decision regarding who is saved and who is damned. Strikingly, faith is only mentioned in <em>three<\/em> of those 50 passages, as being central in salvation and even then it is in conjunction with works, not by itself:\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>2 Thessalonians 1:7-12\u00a0<\/b>. . .\u00a0when the Lord Jesus is revealed from heaven\u00a0with his mighty angels in flaming fire,\u00a0inflicting vengeance\u00a0upon those who do not know God and upon\u00a0those who do not obey the gospel\u00a0of our Lord Jesus. They shall suffer the punishment of eternal destruction and exclusion from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his might, when he comes on that day to be glorified in his saints, and to be marveled at in all who have believed, because our testimony to you was believed. To this end we always pray for you, that our\u00a0God may make you\u00a0worthy of his call, and may fulfil every\u00a0good resolve and <strong><em>work of faith<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0by his power, so that the name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and you in him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Jude 20-21\u00a0<\/b>But you, beloved,\u00a0<em><strong>build yourselves up\u00a0on your most holy faith<\/strong><\/em>; pray in the Holy Spirit;\u00a0keep yourselves in the love of God; wait for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto\u00a0eternal life.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Revelation 21:8\u00a0<\/b>But as for the cowardly, <strong><em>the\u00a0faithless<\/em><\/strong>, the polluted, as for\u00a0murderers,\u00a0fornicators,\u00a0sorcerers,\u00a0idolaters, and all\u00a0liars, their lot shall be in the\u00a0lake that burns with fire and sulphur, which is the second death.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Why does Paul write, \u201cwhere there is no law, neither is there violation\u2026For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law, but under grace\u201d (Romans 4:15, 6:14), as well as emphasizing elsewhere that once a person becomes a Christian he is no longer under\u00a0<em>any<\/em>\u00a0law of works (Romans 5:13, 10:4, 1 Corinthians 6:12, Galatians 3:11-25)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">What is the \u201cliberty\u201d to which Paul and James refer (Galatians 2:4, Galatians 5:1, James 2:12)? If Christians are still in bondage to a law of works, and the sting of eternal death still remains in some sins, then how can a Christian have \u201cliberty\u201d, and how can \u201call things be lawful\u201d to him (1 Corinthians 6:12)? Don\u2019t Paul\u2019s and James\u2019 comments in these passages require that the Christian be free from\u00a0<em>all\u00a0<\/em>bondage of the law, not just some?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">All that has to do with observing the works of the law; i.e., following Mosaic law, not all works whatever, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/10\/st-paul-on-grace-faith-works-50-passages.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Paul repeatedly commands us to perform<\/a>. See Theopedia, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theopedia.com\/new-perspective-on-paul\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">\u201cNew Perspective on Paul.\u201d<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If some \u201creally bad\u201d sins cause the loss of salvation, while other sins don\u2019t, as critics of eternal security tend to believe, then why do Paul and James say that a person would have to maintain a law of works\u00a0<em>perfectly<\/em>\u00a0in order to be saved by it, and that\u00a0<em>any<\/em>\u00a0violation of\u00a0<em>any<\/em>\u00a0aspect of that law makes a person guilty of violating the entire law (Galatians 3:10, James 2:8-10)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">To show that the Mosaic law never saved anyone; only justification by grace through faith and the finished work of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ on the cross did that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If perfection is the standard that must be met in order to be righteous before God, as we know it is (Matthew 5:48), then how can anybody hope to attain to that standard through their own behavior (Romans 3:23)? If Christ\u2019s perfect righteousness is imputed to us through faith (Romans 3:21-22, 4:5-6, 2 Corinthians 5:21, Philippians 3:9), then why would we need our own imperfect righteousness to be added to His perfect righteousness in order to have eternal life?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">This is now morphing into a standard \/ stock Protestant apologetic for justification by faith alone, which is a different topic. I\u2019m dealing (and so was Jason at first) with the possibility of apostasy or falling away from grace and salvation. I\u2019ve dealt with this other stuff in many other papers of mine.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If assuring believers of their future in Heaven is wrong, because it encourages them to sin, as critics of eternal security suggest, then why did Jesus and the apostles repeatedly assure believers of their future in Heaven (Matthew 26:29, Luke 23:39-43, John 11:25, Romans 5:9, 1 Corinthians 1:8, Philippians 3:20-21, 1 Peter 1:3-5, 5:4, 1 John 5:13, 2 John 2-3)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Most of these are simply repeating passages already addressed above. I\u2019ll reply to the three new ones. Matthew 26:29 was addressed to the eleven disciples (minus Judas). Jesus knew<em> they<\/em> were to be saved. But of course the passage doesn\u2019t apply to every believer. Likewise, Luke 23:39-43 applies only to the thief on the cross. John 11:25 simply states that Jesus is the sole <em>way<\/em> to attain salvation, not <em>who<\/em> will be saved.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Aren\u2019t there motivations for keeping our faith, and for not sinning, aside from loss of salvation (Proverbs 22:5, John 14:23-24, Acts 17:31, Romans 5:5, 1 Corinthians 3:11-15, 2 Corinthians 5:14-17)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Yes, but that\u2019s not a disagreement between Catholics and Protestants.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If passages like 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and Galatians 5:19-21 are lists of sins that cause the loss of salvation, as many critics of eternal security claim, then why do we see examples in scripture of people committing those sins,\u00a0<em>yet remaining saved<\/em>\u00a0(1 Corinthians 3:1-3, 11:17-32)? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Because they repented of them. The lists have to do with habitual sins and cases where people never repent of them. In Catholic and biblical theology, they are mortal sins that cause loss of grace and salvation if one persists in them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Don\u2019t the examples of people committing these sins, yet remaining saved,\u00a0<em>necessitate<\/em>\u00a0that we acknowledge that passages like 1 Corinthians 6 and Galatians 5 are\u00a0<em>not<\/em>\u00a0about how Christians can lose salvation? Instead, aren\u2019t they telling believers not to behave like the unregenerate, who prove that they won\u2019t inherit eternal life by continually living in sin (1 Corinthians 6:11-12)? <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">They may be partially about that aspect, too. Both \/ and . . .\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">In other words, aren\u2019t the unregenerate the ones who will not inherit eternal life, as opposed to believers who sometimes commit one of these sins not inheriting eternal life?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">They will not, but also those who willfully fall into these serious sins will not, either. Hebrews and Revelation provide unarguable, irrefutable\u00a0 evidence that believers can fall away:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Hebrews 3:12-14<\/strong>\u00a0Take care, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil, unbelieving heart, leading you to fall away from the living God. But exhort one another every day . . . that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin. For we share in Christ, if only we hold our first confidence firm to the end.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Hebrews 6:11-12\u00a0<\/strong>And we desire each one of you to show the same earnestness in realizing the full assurance of hope until the end,\u00a0[12] so that you may not be sluggish, but imitators of those who through faith and patience inherit the promises.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Hebrews 10:26-29, 36, 39<\/strong>\u00a0For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,\u00a0[27] but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.\u00a0[28] A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.\u00a0[29] How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace? . . . [36]\u00a0For you have need of endurance, so that you may do the will of God and receive what is promised. . . . [39]\u00a0But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and keep their souls.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Hebrews 12:15<\/strong>\u00a0See to it that no one fail to obtain the grace of God; that no \u201croot of bitterness\u201d spring up and cause trouble, and by it the many become defiled;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Revelation 2:4-5<\/strong>\u00a0But I have this against you, that you have abandoned the love you had at first.\u00a0[5] Remember then from what you have fallen, repent and do the works you did at first. If not, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place, unless you repent.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Doesn\u2019t the man in 1 Corinthians 3:11-15, whose works are\u00a0<em>entirely<\/em>\u00a0bad, yet he\u2019s saved, prove that what\u2019s at stake as far as the Christian\u2019s behavior is concerned is rewards\u00a0<em>in<\/em>\u00a0Heaven, not entrance\u00a0<em>to<\/em>\u00a0Heaven?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The passage talks about differential works (\u201cthe fire will test what <em>sort<\/em> of work each one has done: 3:13). Some of the good work \u201csurvives\u201d (3:14), and others had little or no additional merit, and that \u201cwork is burned up\u201d (3:15). The overall passage is about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2017\/03\/purgatory-refutation-of-james-white-1-corinthians-310-15.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">merit, rewards, and purgatory<\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">When passages like Ephesians 1:7 and Colossians 2:13-14 place no limits on which sins are forgiven, and tell us instead that Christ\u2019s sacrifice covered\u00a0<em>all<\/em>\u00a0sins,<\/span><br>\n<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Yes, of course. Any and all sins can be forgiven if one repents. The one unforgivable sin is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit (basically calling evil good and total unbelief).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">on what basis can the critic of eternal security maintain that those who have trusted Christ are actually only forgiven of past sins and\u00a0<em>some<\/em>\u00a0future sins that \u201caren\u2019t real bad\u201d, while the \u201creally bad\u201d future sins remain uncovered?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">By the biblical <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2015\/11\/mortal-venial-sin-strong-biblical-support.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">distinction between mortal and venial sins<\/a>. The <em>Bible<\/em> taught it (1 Jn 5:16-17; cf. James 1:14-15). We didn\u2019t make it up. And based on all the passages I have brought to bear on falling away . . .\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If Jesus is the Intercessor for and Advocate of the believer only when the believer commits sins that \u201caren\u2019t real bad\u201d, as the critic of eternal security must maintain, then why do Hebrews 7:25 and 1 John 2:1 suggest no such limits? Why do these passages suggest instead that Christ is forever the Intercessor for and Advocate of the believer, no matter what sin has been committed?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Bible teaches that our sins are judged in part based on how much we know (degrees of culpability, just as in civil law; see Lk 12:47-48; 23:34; Jn 19:11 [\u201cgreater sin\u201d]; 1 Tim 1:12-13). All Hebrews 7:25 states is that Jesus can save all who seek Him, and we know that even the greatest sinners can be saved if they repent. 1 John 2:1 says the same. These aspects are not controversial.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If salvation could be lost, it couldn\u2019t be regained (Hebrews 6:4-6). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">How is this passage admitted to be talking about salvation being lost, when supposedly this is impossible in the first place? Jason deftly and decisively refutes himself here, and appears not to realize it. But I suppose he would try to force-fit and eisegete the passage into a mere hypothetical that can\u2019t actually happen. But Hebrews 6 is referring to the most extreme cases: those who \u201ccrucify the Son of God on their own account and hold him up to contempt.\u201d That doesn\u2019t cover all cases of apostasy and is essentially the same as the unpardonable sin.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">How, then, were people like David and Peter saved after committing sins such as adultery and denying Christ?<em>\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Obviously, because they <em>repented<\/em>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">If such sins aren\u2019t bad enough to cause the loss of salvation, what would be?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">David acknowledged \u2014 in his famous Psalm of repentance \u2014 that if he hadn\u2019t repented, the Holy Spirit <em>could indeed<\/em> have left him, as well as salvation:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Psalm 51:11-12<\/strong>\u00a0Cast me not away from thy presence,\u00a0and take not thy holy Spirit from me.\u00a0[12] Restore to me the joy of thy salvation,\u00a0and uphold me with a willing spirit.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">They would have lost their salvation if they <em>hadn\u2019t<\/em> repented. The Bible describes in King Saul\u2019s case that \u201cthe<b>\u00a0<\/b>Spirit\u00a0of the LORD departed from Saul\u201d (1 Sam 16:14).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Why does the book of the Bible that most often refers to salvation as a gift (Romans 3:24, 5:15, 5:16, 6:23, etc.) also tell us that the gifts of God are irrevocable (Romans 11:29)?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I imagine the answer would have something to do with the many related strains of argument that I have been presenting above. Why would the same book of Romans contain the following passage, too?:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><b>Romans 2:5-13\u00a0<\/b>But by your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God\u2019s righteous judgment will be revealed. For\u00a0<em><strong>he will render to every man according to his works<\/strong><\/em>: To those who by patience in well-doing seek for glory and honour and immortality, he will give eternal life; but <em><strong>for those who are factious and\u00a0do not obey the truth, but obey wickedness, there will be wrath and fury<\/strong><\/em>. There will be <em><strong>tribulation and distress for<em>\u00a0<\/em>every human being who does evil<\/strong><\/em>, the Jew first and also the Greek, but <em><strong>glory and honour and peace for\u00a0every one who does good<\/strong><\/em>, the Jew first and also the Greek. For God shows no partiality. All who have sinned without the law will also perish without the law, and all who have sinned under the law will be judged by the law. For <em><strong>it is not the\u00a0hearers\u00a0of the law who are righteous before God, but\u00a0the doers of the law who will be justified<\/strong><\/em>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Even the great chapter of Romans 8 (beloved by one and all Protestants and Catholics too!) contains a <em>conditional<\/em> for salvation beyond faith:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Romans 8:14-17<\/strong>\u00a0For all who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God.\u00a0[15] For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the spirit of sonship. When we cry, \u201cAbba! Father!\u201d\u00a0[16] it is the Spirit himself bearing witness with our spirit that we are children of God,\u00a0[17] and if children, then heirs, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ, <em><strong>provided<\/strong> we<strong> suffer<\/strong> with him <strong>in order that<\/strong> we may also be <strong>glorified<\/strong> with him<\/em>.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">***<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Photo credit:<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Piotr Siedlecki, \u201cHeaven Gates\u201d<\/span> [public domain \/ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.publicdomainpictures.net\/en\/view-image.php?image=287508&amp;picture=heaven-gates\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">PublicDomainPictures.Net<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p>***<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, \u201cWhy Christians Cannot Lose Their Salvation\u201d). It was written, c. December 1998. Jason\u2019s words will be in blue. I will cite his entire paper in replying to it. Jason is notorious for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":50173,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[231,50],"tags":[151,1987,3675,1482,1985,1986,145,238,2342,9561,3672,3673,244,1471,229,1650,1123,4699,1500,4019,4701,2344,3674,146,2341,243,1207],"class_list":["post-50171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-anti-catholicism","category-salvation-justification","tag-apostasy","tag-appropriation-of-grace","tag-assurance-of-salvation","tag-catholic-soteriology","tag-co-laborers-with-god","tag-cooperation-with-gods-grace","tag-eternal-security","tag-faith","tag-faith-alone","tag-falling-away-from-salvation","tag-falling-from-grace","tag-falling-from-salvation","tag-grace","tag-grace-alone","tag-heaven","tag-hope","tag-imputed-justification","tag-instant-salvation","tag-jason-engwer","tag-judas","tag-judas-iscariot","tag-justification","tag-losing-ones-salvation","tag-perseverance-of-the-saints","tag-salvation","tag-soteriology-2","tag-synergy"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, &quot;Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called &quot;eternal security.&quot;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, &quot;Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called &quot;eternal security.&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-27T00:08:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2020-07-27T01:15:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2020\/07\/HeavenGates.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html\",\"name\":\"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-27T00:08:55+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2020-07-27T01:15:17+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, \\\"Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called \\\"eternal security.\\\"\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security","description":"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, \"Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called \"eternal security.\"","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security","og_description":"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, \"Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called \"eternal security.\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2020-07-27T00:08:55+00:00","article_modified_time":"2020-07-27T01:15:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":640,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2020\/07\/HeavenGates.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html","name":"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-27T00:08:55+00:00","dateModified":"2020-07-27T01:15:17+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"vs. Anti-Catholic Apologist Jason Engwer This is my answer to the questions posed in the paper,\u00a0A Challenge to Those Who Deny Eternal Security\u00a0(aka, \"Why Protestant anti-Catholic apologist Jason Engwer offered a long series of challenges for those who deny the doctrine held by a significant portion of Protestants, called \"eternal security.\"","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2020\/07\/reply-to-protestant-challenges-re-eternal-security.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Reply to Protestant Challenges Re Eternal Security"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50171\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50173"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}