![\"An](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2023\/03\/JonahWhale.jpg\")
Jonah 1:15, 17<\/strong> (RSV) So they took up Jonah and threw him into the sea; and the sea ceased from its raging. . . . And the LORD appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah; and Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.<\/p>\n
Jonah 2:1-3, 5-7, 10<\/strong> Then Jonah prayed to the LORD his God from the belly of the fish, saying, \u201cI called to the LORD, out of my distress, and he answered me; out of the belly of Sheol I cried, and thou didst hear my voice. For thou didst cast me into the deep, into the heart of the seas, and the flood was round about me; all thy waves and thy billows passed over me. . . . The waters closed in over me, the deep was round about me; weeds were wrapped about my head at the roots of the mountains. I went down to the land whose bars closed upon me for ever; yet thou didst bring up my life from the Pit, O LORD my God. When my soul fainted within me, I remembered the LORD; and my prayer came to thee, into thy holy temple.\u201d . . . And the LORD spoke to the fish, and it vomited out Jonah upon the dry land.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The usual discussion about this incident is whether it is possible for a whale to swallow a man in the first place. And those trained in biology and zoology inform us that whales actually have very small throats, because most of them are vegetarians and eat tiny organisms in the sea. The staple of the diet, for example, of blue whales \u2014 the largest animal to ever live on the earth \u2014 is (ironically) krill: tiny animals similar to miniature shrimp. But there is a big exception to the rule. Sperm whales are carnivorous, and eat squid, sharks, shrimp, and other fish. They have up to 60 teeth: all on their bottom jaw, and these teeth can grow up to eight inches and weigh two pounds.<\/p>\n
Because of this sort of diet of large animals, their throat is much larger than other whales: about two feet across: large enough to swallow a man (the average shoulder width of a grown man being only 16-18 inches). Giant squids, one of the sperm whale\u2019s favorite foods, can grow 33-40 feet long, and have a width of 3-5 feet. But sperm whales manage to swallow them, so their throats must be capable of expansion, to accommodate the slippery delicacy, because we know that they are capable of swallowing giant squids whole. And the male sperm whale is 52-60 feet.<\/p>\n
Jonah took a ship from Joppa on the coast of Israel (Jonah 1:3), trying to get away from God; heading for Tarshish (which I have argued<\/a> is in Spain). This was the Mediterranean Sea. Were there sperm whales in that body of water during Old Testament times? Not only were they present in ancient days (\u201cobserved in the classical era\u201d<\/a>), but they are still present now<\/em>: with estimates of as many as 2,500, according to an article in Scientific Reports<\/em><\/a> (February 7, 2022). I therefore submit that the \u201cgreat fish\u201d (\u201cphenomenological\u201d\u00a0 biblical language of appearances) that \u201cswallow[ed] up Jonah\u201d was a sperm whale.<\/p>\n
Now what remains to be determined is:<\/p>\n
1) whether Jonah drowned before he was swallowed up,
\n2) whether he was swallowed alive,
\n3) whether he could survive in the whale\u2019s belly for over two days,
\n4) whether God kept him alive through miraculous means,
\n5) whether he died while in the whale\u2019s belly and was then resurrected while still in the belly, or
\n6)\u00a0whether he died in the whale\u2019s belly or drowned before he got there, and was resurrected after the whale spit him out.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nThe usual (probably \u201cstandard\u201d) opinion is a combination of #2 and #4. I shall contend for #1 along with the second half of #5. And I will do so based on exegesis and a closer analogy to Jesus\u2019 reference back to \u201cthe sign of Jonah\u201d as a graphic analogy to His own resurrection. I actually held the \u201cstandard\u201d view on this subject until I wrote my presently expressed opinion, after analyzing the question anew (and it is a fascinating topic indeed).<\/p>\n
I think we can immediately rule out natural survival in a whale\u2019s belly for 2-3 days (#3) because science tells us that there simply isn\u2019t enough oxygen (if there is any at all). So if we are to believe the biblical account at all, and believe in its inspiration from an omniscient God (as I do, and as all Christians consistently should), we have no choice but to adopt some form of miraculous preservation or resurrection.<\/p>\n
First is the question of whether Jonah drowned, and later described his own drowning. I think the text offers many clues that he did indeed drown. The interpretation is actually a rather \u201ceasy-fitting\u201d one, once provisionally adopted:<\/p>\n
the flood was round about me; all thy waves and thy billows passed over me. . . . The waters closed in over me, the deep was round about me; . . . [I was] at the roots of the mountains. I went down to the land whose bars closed upon me for ever; yet thou didst bring up my life from the Pit, O LORD my God. . . . my soul fainted within me . . .<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
That appears to me to be eight different descriptions of the process of drowning. Jonah lived the tale because he was brought back to life by God, and hence could incorporate his thoughts about the utter horror of drowning within his prayer to God (later preserved in Holy Scripture). What more could be said? One might argue, I suppose, that he was describing the process of the initial conscious phase of drowning but didn\u2019t actually succumb.<\/p>\n
But two aspects of the above text seem to work directly against that. He refers to a \u201cland\u201d (Sheol: the netherworld) \u201cwhose bars closed upon me for ever.\u201d He had died, and at the time had no idea that God would bring him back to an earthly existence (particularly for the purpose of preaching to the Ninevites so that they could repent). Secondly, he refers to being brought back<\/em> (\u201cthou didst bring up my life\u201d) from \u201cthe Pit\u201d: a common name for Sheol (see about 43 examples in the Old Testament<\/a>).<\/p>\n
So the text truly seems to be saying that Jonah drowned. He was then swallowed by the sperm whale. Presumably the whale started digesting him, but God was to raise him, anyway, so that would be neither here nor there. We don\u2019t have to explain how he could live inside a whale for that long. God then raised him while in the whale\u2019s belly, and he prays the prayer that we have, describing his death by drowning, descent to Sheol, and being brought back by God\u2019s mercy and lovingkindness. Once having been brought back<\/em>, the whale would have to spit him out very soon, due to the lack of oxygen, and the text seems to me perfectly compatible with that<\/em> scenario, too.<\/p>\n
Now what is even more interesting, is the very close, if not exact analogy to Jesus\u2019 references to the incident in relation to His own resurrection:<\/p>\n
Matthew 12:39-40<\/strong> But he answered them, \u201cAn evil and adulterous generation seeks for a sign; but no sign shall be given to it except the sign of the prophet Jonah. For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the whale, so will the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth. (cf. Luke 11:29-32)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
If we follow my proposed interpretation, the analogy (apart from Jonah\u2019s disobedience) is virtually exact<\/em>:<\/p>\n
1a) Jonah died, delivered up and forsaken, \u201cinto the heart of the seas.\u201d<\/p>\n
1b) Jesus died, delivered up and forsaken, on the cross.<\/p>\n
2a) Jonah, after drowning and going to Sheol, was \u201cswallowed up\u201d by the whale, as an analogy to Sheol (\u201cthe belly of Sheol\u201d) for three days and three nights (Jonah 1:17). The Old Testament refers to being \u201cswallowed up\u201d as a metaphor for divine wrath and death, several times<\/a> (e.g., \u201cthe earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up\u201d: three times<\/em>: Num. 16:32; 26:10; Deut. 11:6). Numbers 16:30 even states: \u201cthe ground opens its mouth, and swallows them up, . . . and they go down alive into Sheol.\u201d Proverbs 1:12 states similarly: \u201clike Sheol let us swallow them alive and whole, like those who go down to the Pit.\u201d<\/p>\n
2b) Jesus was buried three days and three nights \u201cin the heart of the earth\u201d.<\/p>\n
3a) Jonah was raised by the Father while his body was still in the belly of the whale (\u201che answered me; . . . thou didst hear my voice. . . . thou didst bring up my life from the Pit\u201d).<\/p>\n
3b) Jesus was raised by the Father while His body was still in His tomb (Acts 5:30; Gal. 1:1; 1 Thess. 1:10; cf. Acts 1:27: \u201cFor thou wilt not abandon my soul to Hades, nor let thy Holy One see corruption.\u201d).<\/p>\n
4a) Jonah emerges from the belly of the whale, raised again after drowning and having visited Sheol, and preaches repentance and salvation to the Ninevites (Jonah 3:1-4), who do indeed repent (Jonah 3:5-10).<\/p>\n
4b) Jesus emerges from the tomb, resurrected after having been crucified, and having visited Sheol<\/a>, and commissions His disciples to preach the gospel of repentance and salvation (which they successfully do, with 3,000 converts on the Day of Pentecost alone: Acts 2:41).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Being resurrected after dying and being buried is the heart of the entire analogy. If Jonah hadn\u2019t actually died in the sea, I submit that \u201cthe sign of Lazarus\u201d would be closer to Jesus\u2019 resurrection than the sign of Jonah, and would have been, in my humble opinion, the analogy that Jesus would have highlighted. The emphasis in a \u201cnon-dead Jonah scenario\u201d shifts to the mere length of time<\/em>, rather than the thing itself (resurrection). This and the other factors noted above have caused me to change my mind on Jonah and the whale. I love when that happens!<\/p>\n
\n***<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n\nPractical Matters<\/em><\/strong>: Perhaps some of my 4,200+ free online articles (the most comprehensive \u201cone-stop\u201d Catholic apologetics site) or\u00a0fifty-one books<\/a>\u00a0have helped you (by God\u2019s grace) to decide to\u00a0become Catholic<\/a>\u00a0or to\u00a0return to the Church<\/a>,\u00a0or better understand some doctrines and\u00a0why<\/em>\u00a0we believe them<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\nOr you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I\u2019m always in need of more funds: especially\u00a0monthly<\/em>\u00a0support. \u201cThe laborer is worthy of his wages\u201d (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a\u00a0full-time Catholic apologist<\/a>,\u00a0and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.<\/p>\n
PayPal donations<\/a>\u00a0are the easiest: just send to my email address: apologistdave@gmail.com. You\u2019ll see the term \u201cCatholic Used Book Service\u201d, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing, including 100% tax deduction, etc., see my page:\u00a0About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong \/ Donation Information<\/a>.\u00a0Thanks a million<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0from the bottom of my heart!<\/p>\n
***<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n