{"id":7268,"date":"2016-05-03T17:55:50","date_gmt":"2016-05-03T21:55:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?p=7268"},"modified":"2017-02-27T13:16:57","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T17:16:57","slug":"mutual-submission-headship-contraries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html","title":{"rendered":"Mutual Submission &#038; Headship: Contraries?"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-7269 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2016\/05\/RomanticCouple.jpg\" alt=\"RomanticCouple\" width=\"640\" height=\"426\"><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Photograph by \u201cldesignstudio\u201d: 12-30-12<\/span> [<a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/en\/engagement-couple-love-romance-637788\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Pixabay<\/a><span style=\"color: #000000;\"> \/ public domain:<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/en\/service\/terms\/#usage\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"> CC0 license<\/a>]<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*****<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><span style=\"color: #000000;\">These thoughts came about in a Facebook discussion about an<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lmschairman.org\/2016\/04\/mutual-submission-of-spouses-coherent.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">article by Joseph Shaw<\/a>,<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> about\u00a0how\u00a0the notion of \u201cmutual submission\u201d in marriage is manipulated by modernists and liberals to imply that the headship of the husband is overthrown or never was a true teaching; and whether it necessarily <em>must<\/em> be thought of in this way. Shaw gives as a contrary possibility my own \u201charmonious\u201d and \u201cboth\/and\u201d interpretation.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">*****<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Ephesians 5:21-33<\/strong> (RSV)<\/span>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Be <em><strong>subject<\/strong> <\/em>to <em><strong>one another<\/strong><\/em> out of reverence for Christ.<\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">\u00a0[22]<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Wives, be subject to your husbands, as to the Lord<\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">. [23] For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. [24] As the church is subject to Christ, so let wives also be subject in everything to their husbands. [25]<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her<\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">, [26] that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, [27] that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish.\u00a0[28] Even so<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">husbands should love their wives as their own bodies<\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">. He who loves his wife loves himself. [29]<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">For no man ever hates his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, as Christ does the church<\/span>,<span style=\"color: #000000;\"> [30] because we are members of his body. [31] \u201cFor this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.\u201d [32] This mystery is a profound one, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church; [33] however, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Mutual submission applies more than just to man and wife, but it also <em>includes<\/em>\u00a0man and wife. The man has to love his wife as Christ loved the Church and since He died for us and was a servant of all, Paul and Pope St. John Paul II are saying that this is part of the man\u2019s role as well, as part and parcel of his headship.\u00a0Jesus and popes are heads but also servants; likewise with husbands.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Both\/and . . . <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I don\u2019t see it as either\/or. Mutual submission is a deeper teaching that has scriptural warrant as well. I don\u2019t see why we have to assume that both things are mutually exclusive.\u00a0That\u2019s the typical Protestant mindset, not our Catholic one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Holy Scripture has much about the \u201cleader as servant\u201d and general servanthood \/ humility motif:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Matthew 18:4<\/strong>\u00a0Whoever <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">humbles himself like this child<\/span>, he is the <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">greatest<\/span> in the kingdom of heaven.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Matthew 20:25-28<\/strong>\u00a0But Jesus called them to him and said, \u201cYou know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. [26] It shall not be so among you; but whoever would be great among you must be your <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">servant<\/span>, [27] and whoever would be first among you must be your <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">slave<\/span>; [28] even as <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">the Son of man came not to be served but to serve<\/span>, and to <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">give his life<\/span> as a ransom for many.\u201d<\/span>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #000000;\">(cf. Mk 10:42-45)<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Matthew 23:11-12<\/strong>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">He who is greatest among you shall be your servant<\/span>; [12] whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">whoever humbles himself will be exalted<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>John 13:5-14<\/strong>\u00a0Then he poured water into a basin, and began to wash the disciples\u2019 feet, and to wipe them with the towel with which he was girded. [6] He came to Simon Peter; and Peter said to him, \u201cLord, do you wash my feet?\u201d [7] Jesus answered him, \u201cWhat I am doing you do not know now, but afterward you will understand.\u201d [8] Peter said to him, \u201cYou shall never wash my feet.\u201d Jesus answered him, \u201cIf I do not wash you, you have no part in me.\u201d [9] Simon Peter said to him, \u201cLord, not my feet only but also my hands and my head!\u201d [10] Jesus said to him, \u201cHe who has bathed does not need to wash, except for his feet, but he is clean all over; and you are clean, but not every one of you.\u201d [11] For he knew who was to betray him; that was why he said, \u201cYou are not all clean.\u201d [12] When he had washed their feet, and taken his garments, and resumed his place, he said to them, \u201cDo you know what I have done to you? [13] You call me Teacher and Lord; and you are right, for so I am. [14]<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> If I then, your Lord and Teacher, have washed your feet, you also ought to wash one another\u2019s feet<\/span>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>John 15:13-15\u00a0<\/strong>Greater love has no man than this, that a man<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> lay down his life for his friends<\/span>. [14] You are my<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> friends<\/span> if you do what I command you. <\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\">[15] No longer do I call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing; but <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">I have called you friends<\/span>, for all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 Corinthians 3:5<\/strong>\u00a0What then is Apol\u2019los? What is Paul? <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Servants<\/span> through whom you believed, as the Lord assigned to each.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>2 Corinthians 4:5\u00a0<\/strong>For what we preach is not ourselves, but Jesus Christ as Lord, with ourselves as <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">your servants<\/span> for Jesus\u2019 sake.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Galatians 5:13<\/strong>\u00a0For you were called to freedom, brethren; only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love be<\/span> <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">servants <\/span><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">of one another<\/span>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>Philippians 2:5-8<\/strong>\u00a0Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, [6] who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, [7] but<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\"> emptied himself, taking the form of a servant<\/span>, being born in the likeness of men. [8] And being found in human form <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">he humbled himself<\/span> and became obedient unto death, even death on a cross.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>James 4:10<\/strong>\u00a0<span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">Humble yourselves<\/span> before the Lord and he will exalt you.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><strong>1 Peter 5:5<\/strong>\u00a0Likewise you that are younger be subject to the elders. Clothe yourselves, all of you, with <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">humility toward one another<\/span>, for \u201cGod opposes the proud, but gives grace to the <span style=\"color: #0000ff;\">humble<\/span>.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\" data-ft='{\"tn\":\"K\"}'> <span class=\"UFICommentBody\">I believe in\u00a0headship, as a biblical and Catholic truth. I think Pope St. John Paul\u00a0II\u2019s teaching about mutuality is <em>also<\/em>\u00a0a biblical and Catholic truth. Both\/and.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>The fact remains that men have too often abused their roles as the heads in marriage, and Pope John Paul the Great\u2019s additional complementary message was very timely and prudent in our day and age.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The \u00a0either\/or (false dichotomy) mentality is behind so many errors and a valued arrow in the devil\u2019s quiver. Practically the entire so-called \u201cReformation\u201d was built upon this single erroneous mentality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Abusive husbands not new (of course), but we have a greater breakdown of marriage in our time, for various reasons. So it is timely in the sense that it grappled with one cause of breakdown of marriages: husbands lording it over their wives and completely distorting biblical marital headship, making it some pathetic master\/slave relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The biblical view is headship of the husband , but with a head \/ husband that is a loving servant, not a hard taskmaster. Jesus \/ popes, and husbands alike . . .<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I think the husband\u2019s task is by far the greater of the two, since we are commanded to love our wives like Christ loved the Church. The wife is never told <em>that<\/em>!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">My friend Al Kresta has a cute saying. He says that if a husband says in a stupid way, \u201csubmit, wife!\u201d she should say back to him, \u201cget crucified, buddy!\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p>*****<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Meta Description:\u00a0I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Meta Keywords:\u00a0marriage, gender, complementarity of gender, headship of the husband, marital submission, mutual submission in marriage, humility, servanthood, charity, love, matrimony, marital relationship, male and female roles, unisex, feminism, traditional gender roles<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Photograph by \u201cldesignstudio\u201d: 12-30-12 [Pixabay \/ public domain: CC0 license] ***** These thoughts came about in a Facebook discussion about an article by Joseph Shaw, about\u00a0how\u00a0the notion of \u201cmutual submission\u201d in marriage is manipulated by modernists and liberals to imply that the headship of the husband is overthrown or never was a true teaching; and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2331,"featured_media":7269,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[123],"tags":[100,2751,920,2585,2752,2755,1577,2758,2757,2753,276,1479,2754,2756,2760,2759],"class_list":["post-7268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-sexuality-and-gender-issues","tag-charity","tag-complementarity-of-gender","tag-feminism","tag-gender","tag-headship-of-the-husband","tag-humility","tag-love","tag-male-and-female-roles","tag-marital-relationship","tag-marital-submission","tag-marriage","tag-matrimony","tag-mutual-submission-in-marriage","tag-servanthood","tag-traditional-gender-roles","tag-unisex"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Mutual Submission &amp; Headship: Contraries?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mutual Submission &amp; Headship: Contraries?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-05-03T21:55:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-27T17:16:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2016\/05\/RomanticCouple.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"640\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"426\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dave Armstrong\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html\",\"name\":\"Mutual Submission & Headship: Contraries?\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2016-05-03T21:55:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-27T17:16:57+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\"},\"description\":\"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mutual Submission &#038; Headship: Contraries?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/\",\"name\":\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism\",\"description\":\"Catholic biblical apologetics\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e\",\"name\":\"Dave Armstrong\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dave Armstrong\"},\"description\":\"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \\\"This Rock\\\" (now called \\\"Catholic Answers Magazine\\\"), \\\"Envoy Magazine\\\" (Patrick Madrid), \\\"The Catholic Answer,\\\" \\\"The Coming Home Journal,\\\" \\\"Gilbert Magazine\\\" (American Chesterton Society), and \\\"The Latin Mass.\\\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \\\"The Michigan Catholic\\\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \\\"Catholic Answers Live\\\" (twice), \\\"Faith and Family Live\\\" (Steve Wood), \\\"Kresta in the Afternoon,\\\" \\\"Son Rise Morning Show,\\\" \\\"Catholic Connection\\\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \\\"The Catholics Next Door.\\\" His large and popular website, \\\"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\\\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \\\"Envoy Magazine.\\\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \\\"index\\\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \\\"Surprised by Truth\\\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \\\"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\\\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \\\"The Catholic Verses\\\" (2004), \\\"The One-Minute Apologist\\\" (2007), \\\"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\\\" (2009), \\\"The Quotable Newman\\\" (editor: 2012), and \\\"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\\\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \\\"The New Catholic Answer Bible\\\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \\\"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\\\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \\\"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\\\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \\\"Quotable Wesley\\\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mutual Submission & Headship: Contraries?","description":"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mutual Submission & Headship: Contraries?","og_description":"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html","og_site_name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","article_published_time":"2016-05-03T21:55:50+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-27T17:16:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":640,"height":426,"url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2016\/05\/RomanticCouple.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Dave Armstrong","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dave Armstrong","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html","name":"Mutual Submission & Headship: Contraries?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website"},"datePublished":"2016-05-03T21:55:50+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-27T17:16:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e"},"description":"I argue that mutual submission of married couples is completely compatible with male headship, rightly understood in light of Scripture.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/2016\/05\/mutual-submission-headship-contraries.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mutual Submission &#038; Headship: Contraries?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/","name":"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism","description":"Catholic biblical apologetics","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/471eaa20e441eca4bb1ea50393cf632e","name":"Dave Armstrong","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/820e6db89734ae7a9e5dac8d498f5ac7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dave Armstrong"},"description":"Dave Armstrong is a Catholic author and apologist, who has been actively proclaiming and defending Christianity since 1981, and Catholicism in particular since 1991 (full-time since December 2001). Formerly a campus missionary, as a Protestant, Dave was received into the Catholic Church in February 1991, by the late, well-known catechist and theologian, Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave\u2019s articles have appeared in many influential Catholic periodicals, including \"This Rock\" (now called \"Catholic Answers Magazine\"), \"Envoy Magazine\" (Patrick Madrid), \"The Catholic Answer,\" \"The Coming Home Journal,\" \"Gilbert Magazine\" (American Chesterton Society), and \"The Latin Mass.\" He also writes a featured column for every issue of \"The Michigan Catholic\": published by the archdiocese of Detroit, and was editor for most of the apologetics tracts published by the St. Paul Street Evangelization apostolate. Dave\u2019s apologetics and writing apostolate was the subject of a feature article in the May 2002 issue of \"Envoy Magazine.\" He served as the staff moderator at the Internet discussion forum for The Coming Home Network, from 2007-2010. Dave has been interviewed on many nationally syndicated Catholic radio shows, including \"Catholic Answers Live\" (twice), \"Faith and Family Live\" (Steve Wood), \"Kresta in the Afternoon,\" \"Son Rise Morning Show,\" \"Catholic Connection\" (Teresa Tomeo), and \"The Catholics Next Door.\" His large and popular website, \"Biblical Evidence for Catholicism,\" was online from March 1997 to March 2007, and received the 1998 Catholic Website of the Year award from \"Envoy Magazine.\" His blog of the same name (now transferred to Patheos), begun in February 2004, contains more than 1,500 papers, at least 500 debates or dialogues, and over 50 distinct \"index\" web pages. Unsolicited correspondence has indicated many hundreds of conversions (or returns) to the Catholic faith as a result, by God's grace, of these writings. Dave's conversion story was published in the bestselling book \"Surprised by Truth\" (edited by Patrick Madrid; San Diego: Basilica Press, 1994). Sophia Institute Press has published six of his books: \"A Biblical Defense of Catholicism\" (Foreword by Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J., 1996 \/ 2003), \"The Catholic Verses\" (2004), \"The One-Minute Apologist\" (2007), \"Bible Proofs for Catholic Truths\" (2009), \"The Quotable Newman\" (editor: 2012), and \"Proving the Catholic Faith is Biblical\" (2015). He is co-author (with Dr. Paul Thigpen) of the inserts for \"The New Catholic Answer Bible\" (Our Sunday Visitor: 2005), and editor for \"The Wisdom of Mr. Chesterton: The Very Best Quotes, Quips, and Cracks from the Pen of G. K. Chesterton\" (Saint Benedict Press \/ TAN Books: 2009). \"100 Biblical Arguments Against Sola Scriptura\" was published by Catholic Answers in May 2012. His \"Quotable Wesley\" compilation was published by (Protestant \/ Wesleyan publisher) Beacon Hill Press in April 2014. Several of his 49 books are bestsellers in their field. Dave maintains a popular personal Facebook page, a Facebook author page, and has a Twitter account as well. He offers almost all of his books in e-book form on his own Biblical Catholicism site (http:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/), at a permanent deep discount: only $2.99 for ePub, mobi, and AZW, and $1.99 for PDF. His writing has been enthusiastically endorsed or recommended by many leading Catholic apologists, authors, and priests, including Dr. Scott Hahn, Fr. Peter M. J. Stravinskas, Marcus Grodi, Patrick Madrid, Steve Ray, Tim Staples, Devin Rose, Mike Aquilina, Al Kresta, Karl Keating, Fr. Dwight Longenecker, Brandon Vogt, Marcellino D'Ambrosio, and Fr. John A. Hardon, S. J. Dave has been happily married to his wife Judy since October 1984. They have three sons and a daughter, and reside in southeast Michigan (metro Detroit).","sameAs":["https:\/\/biblicalcatholicism.com\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/dave.armstrong.798","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@LuxVeritatisApologetics"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/author\/davearmstrong"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2331"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7268\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/davearmstrong\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}