![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/572\/2024\/06\/CannonFinland.jpg\")
<\/a>\u201cPlease Hit \u2018Subscribe\u2019\u201d!<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0If you have received benefit from this or any of my other 4,600+ articles, please follow this blog by signing up (with your email address) on the sidebar to the right (you may have to scroll down a bit), above where there is an icon bar, \u201cSign Me Up!\u201d: to receive notice when I post a new blog article. This is the equivalent of subscribing to a\u00a0YouTube<\/em>\u00a0channel. Please also consider\u00a0following me on Twitter \/ X\u00a0and purchasing\u00a0one or more of my 55 books<\/a>.\u00a0All of this helps me get more exposure, and (however little!) more income for my full-time apologetics work. Thanks so much and happy reading!<\/p>\n ***<\/p>\n Anti-Catholic Reformed Protestant polemicist James Swan, of Boors All<\/em> infamy, wrote an article about a CARM discussion: itself entitled, \u201cWho Gave the Reformers Authority<\/em>?\u201d (7-31-07<\/a>). His words will be in blue<\/span>; a Catholic interlocutor\u2019s on the board in green<\/span>.<\/p>\n You forget the Church came before the Bible!<\/span><\/p>\n No, God is the primary author of Scripture. He is the source behind it. <\/span><\/p>\n No kidding. No one denies that. The point is obviously a chronological one. If we\u2019re talking about he New Testament, the earliest books were the\u00a0Epistle to the Galatians (c. 48)<\/sup> and 1 Thessalonians (c. 50). The Church began on the Day of Pentecost (see Acts 2), right after Jesus\u2019 Ascension (30-33 or so).<\/p>\n The same Gospel in the New Testament was preached in the Old Testament (Gal. 3:5-14).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Abraham knew of a sort of proto-gospel of justification by faith, as Paul explains. But of course that\u2019s technically not the Gospel, as I just explained in a recent post<\/a> replying to Swan. St. Paul defines the gospel in Acts 13:16-41 as the Resurrection of Jesus (vss. 32-33), and in 1 Corinthians 15:1-8 as His death, burial, and Resurrection (cf. 2 Tim 2:10-11). Moreover, the problem with Protestants and Abraham is that the Bible teaches that he was \u00a0justified twice by works & once by faith<\/a>.<\/p>\n The basic Gospel truths were based on the Old Testament, <\/span><\/p>\n There were certainly many messianic passages (I love them), but it was still a very primitive kernel.<\/p>\n and were later inscripturated in the writing of the New Testament. The doctrine was the same before it was written.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Not quite. As Paul wrote nine verses after what Swan cited:<\/p>\n Galatians 3:23-27<\/strong> (RSV) Now before faith came, we were confined under the law, kept under restraint until faith should be revealed. [24] So that the law was our custodian [KJV, \u201ctutor\u201d] until Christ came, that we might be justified by faith. [25] But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a custodian; [26] for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. [27] For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. (cf. Phil 4:15: \u201cthe beginning of the gospel\u201d in Paul\u2019s lifetime; and 2 Tim 1:10: \u201cmanifested through the appearing of our Savior Christ Jesus, who abolished death and brought life and immortality to light through the gospel.\u201d)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Matthew also wrote about the advent of the gospel:<\/p>\n Matthew 4:13-16<\/strong> and leaving Nazareth he went and dwelt in Caper\u2019na-um by the sea, in the territory of Zeb\u2019ulun and Naph\u2019tali, [14] that what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah might be fulfilled: [15] \u201cThe land of Zeb\u2019ulun and the land of Naph\u2019tali, toward the sea, across the Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles \u2014 [16] the people who sat in darkness have seen a great light, and for those who sat in the region and shadow of death light has dawned.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n How do you know what constitutes the New Testament canon?<\/span><\/p>\n Since God is the primary author of his Word, I trust in his divine providence to reveal His word to His church. So, I \u201cknow,\u201d because God has spoken.<\/span><\/p>\n Yes, God spoke through the Catholic Church in the late 4th century (Councils of Hippo and Carthage), which finalized the NT canon and the OT canon, including the Deuterocanon that Protestants reject. If we are to go just by individual Christians, then the first to list all 27 NT books in one place was Athanasius in 367 AD. It took more than 330 years after Christ for anyone to figure that out.<\/p>\n How do you know for certain that these 27 books here in your New Testament are in fact inspired and should be in the New Testament?<\/span><\/p>\n This is basically the question of an atheist. <\/span><\/p>\n Not at all. It\u2019s a basic epistemological and fundamental question that all Christians (at least ones who think seriously about the faith) must grapple with: how do we know that our \u201choly books\u201d are in fact that? On what basis? The Catholic view is coherent and self-consistent. The Protestant view isn\u2019t. As the Presbyterian R. C. Sproul famously put it, Protestants have a \u201cfallible collection of infallible books\u201d (because they deny the biblical doctrine of the infallibility of the Church<\/a>).<\/p>\n It assumes that God does not have purposes in revealing His Word, and that He is incapable of protecting and preserving that Word. <\/span><\/p>\n It does no such thing. It simply inquires as to how we know<\/em> that the NT is what it is.<\/p>\n The canon is the result of God\u2019s purposes. It is God who preserves His Word for His church. The Church, or the people of God, hear the voice of God. If the people of God are indwelt with the Spirit of God, would it not make sense that they will hear the voice of God when He speaks?<\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s all well and good, but it\u2019s simply a string of truisms. It still remains the case that the Protestant has to have a rational, objective way to know the extent of the biblical canon. It can\u2019t be merely subjective piety. It\u2019s not so simple to determine the books on our own (which is why it took so long, historically). See:<\/p>\n The New Testament Canon & Historical Processes<\/a>\u00a0[1996]<\/p>\n Are All Bible Books Self-Evidently Inspired?<\/a>\u00a0[6-19-06]<\/p>\n Are All the Biblical Books Self-Evidently Canonical?<\/a>\u00a0[6-22-06]<\/p>\n Were Apostles Always Aware of Writing Scripture?<\/a>\u00a0(6-29-06; abridged on 9-25-16)<\/p>\n Bible: Completely Self-Authenticating, So that Anyone Could Come up with the Complete Canon without Formal Church Proclamations? (vs. Wm. Whitaker)<\/a>\u00a0[July 2012]<\/p>\n Conundrum! Scripture Alone Cannot Establish the Biblical Canon<\/a>\u00a0[National Catholic Register<\/em>, 5-16-17]<\/p>\n The New Testament Canon is a \u201cLate\u201d Doctrine<\/a>\u00a0[National Catholic Register<\/em>, 1-22-18]<\/p>\n Is Inspiration Immediately Evident in Every Biblical Book?<\/a>\u00a0[National Catholic Register<\/em>, 7-28-18]<\/p>\n Oral Tradition: More Biblical (Pauline) Evidence (. . . and an Examination of the False and Unbiblical Protestant Supposed Refutation of \u201cInscripturation\u201d)<\/a>\u00a0[2-27-21]<\/p>\n But this does not mean the people of God must be infallible in order to hear it. <\/span><\/p>\n That\u2019s correct. They simply had to accept the authority of the Catholic Church, which was established by Jesus Christ Himself, when He made St. Peter the first leader of the Church (i.e., the first pope).<\/p>\n The Roman Catholic Church did not have an infallible declaration of the canon until 1546, <\/span><\/p>\n The earlier councils taught infallibly, after they were confirmed by popes. Trent simply made it a higher level of infallibility, since it was an ecumenical council.<\/p>\n yet, we find the people God previous to this able to know and use Scripture. <\/span><\/p>\n Yes, based on the decrees of Carthage and Hippo,. spearheaded by St. Augustine.<\/p>\n In other words, the question assumes the need for an infallible Church to announce the canon, but when this paradigm is used to interpret church history, it fails to make sense of reality.<\/span><\/p>\n The canon didn\u2019t come from nowhere. There was a very broad consensus, but also a lot of disagreement<\/a>; then the Church settled the issue, as a necessary authority and the \u201cfinal say.\u201d<\/p>\n * Or you may believe my work is worthy to support for the purpose of apologetics and evangelism in general. If so, please seriously consider a much-needed financial contribution. I\u2019m always in need of more funds: especially\u00a0monthly<\/em>\u00a0support. \u201cThe laborer is worthy of his wages\u201d (1 Tim 5:18, NKJV). 1 December 2021 was my 20th anniversary as a\u00a0full-time Catholic apologist<\/a>, and February 2022 marked the 25th anniversary of my blog.<\/p>\n PayPal donations<\/a>\u00a0are the easiest: just send to my email address: apologistdave@gmail.com. Here\u2019s also a\u00a0second page to get to PayPal<\/a>. You\u2019ll see the term \u201cCatholic Used Book Service\u201d, which is my old side-business. To learn about the different methods of contributing (including\u00a0Zelle<\/a>), see my page:\u00a0About Catholic Apologist Dave Armstrong \/ Donation Information<\/a>.\u00a0Thanks a million<\/em><\/strong>\u00a0from the bottom of my heart!
\nPractical Matters<\/em><\/strong>: Perhaps some of my 4,600+ free online articles (the most comprehensive \u201cone-stop\u201d Catholic apologetics site) or\u00a0fifty-five books<\/a>\u00a0have helped you (by God\u2019s grace) to decide to\u00a0become Catholic<\/a>\u00a0or to\u00a0return to the Church<\/a>, or better understand some doctrines and\u00a0why<\/em>\u00a0we believe them<\/a>.<\/p>\n
\n*
\n***
\n*<\/p>\n<\/div>\n