One More Burning Bush<\/a>\u201d argues, does this not imply that God is nothing but the result of a myth-making process developing over time?<\/p>\nWhatever the explanation, these three Bible stories undermine the arguments of believers who insist on the necessity of faith, and reinforce the convictions of skeptics who know it is at best unwise, and at worst dangerous, to accept any claim without sufficient evidence. The first story comes from the Old Testament book of 1 Kings, and concerns a confrontation between the prophet Elijah and the apostate king Ahab.<\/p>\n
Elijah and the Prophets of Baal<\/b><\/p>\n\n\u201cSo Obadiah went to meet Ahab and told him, and Ahab went to meet Elijah. When he saw Elijah, he said to him, \u2018Is that you, you troubler of Israel?\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018I have not made trouble for Israel,\u2019 Elijah replied. \u2018But you and your father\u2019s family have. You have abandoned the Lord\u2019s commands and have followed the Baals. Now summon the people from all over Israel to meet me on Mount Carmel. And bring the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal and the four hundred prophets of Asherah, who eat at Jezebel\u2019s table.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0So Ahab sent word throughout all Israel and assembled the prophets on Mount Carmel. Elijah went before the people and said, \u2018How long will you waver between two opinions? If the Lord is God, follow him; but if Baal is God, follow him.\u2019 But the people said nothing.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then Elijah said to them, \u2018I am the only one of the Lord\u2019s prophets left, but Baal has four hundred and fifty prophets. Get two bulls for us. Let them choose one for themselves, and let them cut it into pieces and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. I will prepare the other bull and put it on the wood but not set fire to it. Then you call on the name of your god, and I will call on the name of the Lord. The god who answers by fire \u2013 he is God.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then all the people said, \u2018What you say is good.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Elijah said to the prophets of Baal, \u2018Choose one of the bulls and prepare it first, since there are so many of you. Call on the name of your god, but do not light the fire.\u2019 So they took the bull given them and prepared it.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then they called on the name of Baal from morning till noon. \u2018O Baal, answer us!\u2019 they shouted. But there was no response; no one answered. And they danced around the altar they had made.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0At noon Elijah began to taunt them. \u2018Shout louder!\u2019 he said. \u2018Surely he is a god! Perhaps he is deep in thought, or busy, or traveling. Maybe he is sleeping and must be awakened.\u2019 So they shouted louder and slashed themselves with swords and spears, as was their custom, until their blood flowed. Midday passed, and they continued their frantic prophesying until the time for the evening sacrifice. But there was no response, no one answered, no one paid attention.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then Elijah said to all the people, \u2018Come here to me.\u2019 They came to him, and he repaired the altar of the Lord, which was in ruins. Elijah took twelve stones, one for each of the tribes descended from Jacob, to whom the word of the Lord had come, saying, \u2018Your name shall be Israel.\u2019 With the stones he built an altar in the name of the Lord, and he dug a trench around it large enough to hold two seahs of seed. He arranged the wood, cut the bull into pieces and laid it on the wood. Then he said to them, \u2018Fill four large jars with water and pour it on the offering and on the wood.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Do it again,\u2019 he said, and they did it again.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Do it a third time,\u2019 he ordered, and they did it the third time. The water ran down around the altar and even filled the trench.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0At the time of sacrifice, the prophet Elijah stepped forward and prayed: \u2018O Lord, God of Abraham, Isaac and Israel, let it be known today that you are God in Israel and that I am your servant and have done all these things at your command. Answer me, O Lord, answer me, so these people will know that you, O Lord, are God, and that you are turning their hearts back again.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then the fire of the Lord fell and burned up the sacrifice, the wood, the stones and the soil, and also licked up the water in the trench.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0When all the people saw this, they fell prostrate and cried, \u2018The Lord \u2013 he is God! The Lord \u2013 he is God!'\u201d
\n\u20141 Kings 18:16-39 (NIV)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
As the reader can see, it was Elijah himself who suggested putting Jehovah to the test against Baal \u2013 Elijah, one of God\u2019s greatest prophets, and one of only three people in the entire Bible (the other two being Enoch and Jesus Christ) who were granted the unparalleled honor of being allowed to ascend directly to Heaven while alive. If there have ever been any people who understood God\u2019s will, Elijah was surely one of them, and he apparently saw nothing wrong with the idea of asking God to prove his existence in full public view. In fact, he was so sure of success he had no problem in giving his own side a disadvantage. And God did not rebuke him by remaining silent \u2013 he responded clearly, in dramatic and unmistakable fashion, showing the assembled nonbelievers that he was the one true deity.<\/p>\n
This is exactly the way skeptics have always said God should act. Instead of hiding himself away, in this story he steps out from behind the curtain and makes his existence obvious, proving himself through a test where the conditions for success and failure were clearly set, the results would be unambiguous, and a success could not be brought about by chance. Why doesn\u2019t he do this more often? He would convince a great number of hardened skeptics, and is that not what he wants? This story lets us know that the Biblical God is not averse to proving himself thusly.<\/p>\n
Proselytizers are fond of saying that nonbelief is a \u201cheart problem\u201d rather than a \u201chead problem,\u201d that those who do not believe have already chosen to do so for selfish personal reasons and thus evidence in the form of miracles would not sway them, but this story shows that to be false. The apostate Israelites were glad to return to worship of the true God when they saw his power demonstrated. Nor, apparently, was God concerned that such a miracle would amount to coercion (the other commonly given explanation for why he does not do them more often); in fact, Elijah explicitly said that its purpose would be to \u201cturn their hearts back\u201d. In sum, this story supports everything skeptics have always said, and the next story will provide further support.<\/p>\n
The Conversion of Saul<\/b><\/p>\n
In any list of the most influential early members of Christianity, the name of St. Paul of Tarsus must stand high. He was a prolific author who wrote a significant portion of the New Testament. He participated in the \u201cJerusalem Conference\u201d recorded in Galatians 2 and Acts 15 that helped hammer out the fledgling religion\u2019s view on the continued applicability of the Jewish law. And he was a tireless and dedicated proselytizer that worked to spread the new faith, and is quite probably the one person who was most responsible for its survival.<\/p>\n
In light of these facts, it may be surprising for some readers to learn who he was before he was St. Paul. Before the dramatic events that effected a 180-degree turnaround in his life, according to the Bible, he was a Roman thug named Saul who eagerly and viciously persecuted Christians. The story of his conversion is the second one this article will discuss.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cMeanwhile, Saul was still breathing out murderous threats against the Lord\u2019s disciples. He went to the high priest and asked him for letters to the synagogues in Damascus, so that if he found any there who belonged to the Way, whether men or women, he might take them as prisoners to Jerusalem. As he neared Damascus on his journey, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. He fell to the ground and heard a voice say to him, \u2018Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Who are you, Lord?\u2019 Saul asked.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting,\u2019 he replied. \u2018Now get up and go into the city, and you will be told what you must do.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The men traveling with Saul stood there speechless; they heard the sound but did not see anyone. Saul got up from the ground, but when he opened his eyes he could see nothing. So they led him by the hand into Damascus. For three days he was blind, and did not eat or drink anything.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0In Damascus there was a disciple named Ananias. The Lord called to him in a vision, \u2018Ananias!\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u2018Yes, Lord,\u2019 he answered.
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The Lord told him, \u2018Go to the house of Judas on Straight Street and ask for a man from Tarsus named Saul, for he is praying. In a vision he has seen a man named Ananias come and place his hands on him to restore his sight.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0[\u2026]
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, \u2018Brother Saul, the Lord \u2013 Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here \u2013 has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.\u2019 Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul\u2019s eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptized.\u201d
\n\u2014Acts 9:1-18 (NIV)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
The story of the Damascus Road conversion raises serious problems for those Christians who claim that God withholds himself because he wants us to choose our own path freely, whether for good or for evil. God did not follow this plan of action with Saul \u2013 instead, he directly and spectacularly manifested himself for the express purpose of changing the course of this man\u2019s life, commanding him in a way that could not be resisted or ignored. <\/p>\n
Furthermore, the reader will note that God did not stop at causing Saul to see a strange light or hear a voice \u2013 events that, no matter how striking, could still have been construed as the result of hallucination. Instead, God supplemented this vision with confirming physical evidence that could not have been faked \u2013 he sent another man who was able to tell Saul, unprompted, the exact contents of his vision. This is information Ananias could only have obtained through revelation, proving to Saul beyond any doubt that his experience was no dream.<\/p>\n
Granted, Saul may be a special case. Perhaps God converted him because he had special potential that Christianity needed to thrive, and perhaps not all of us could achieve as much if we were likewise miraculously converted. But that is besides the point. God was still willing to do this<\/i>, and what he did once, he can do again. The fact that he did it at all shows that he has no objections to doing it in principle. If God wants atheists to believe in him, why doesn\u2019t he send them visions like the one he sent Saul? It is not as if it costs him effort to do so, and wouldn\u2019t it mean more souls saved? Isn\u2019t that what God wants? Believers may object that this would constitute coercion, but that brings us full circle, back to the original question: Why then did he do it for Saul?<\/p>\n
Doubting Thomas<\/b><\/p>\n
The last story this article will examine is the most personal and profound, and will lay to rest once and for all the Christian claim that God wants us to have faith above all else. It is Easter Sunday, the day of the Resurrection, and Jesus has arisen from his tomb. At first the disciples were despairing over their master\u2019s death, because they \u201cknew not the scripture, that he must rise again from the dead\u201d (John 20:9, KJV), but that evening he comes and shows himself to all of them, to their wonder and rejoicing. Almost all of them.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cNow Thomas (called Didymus), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. So the other disciples told him, \u2018We have seen the Lord!\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0But he said to them, \u2018Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe it.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, \u2018Peace be with you!\u2019 Then he said to Thomas, \u2018Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.\u2019
\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Thomas said to him, \u2018My Lord and my God!'\u201d
\n\u2014John 20:24-28 (NIV)\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
Keep in mind the identity of this skeptic. Thomas was one of the original twelve disciples<\/i>, one of the select few who had accompanied Jesus throughout his ministry and therefore had already<\/i> seen most if not all of his miracles. In particular, he witnessed one of Jesus\u2019 most spectacular miracles, and one of the most relevant in this instance \u2013 the resurrection of Lazarus (as testified to by John 11:16, which mentions Thomas by name). But despite having seen Jesus fulfill the prophecies of the Old Testament, having seen him display supernatural power over nature, and having seen him raise people bodily from the dead, Thomas still<\/i> wanted to touch Jesus\u2019 scars himself before he was willing to believe in the Resurrection! Surely this is the epitome of hard-hearted skepticism!<\/p>\n
And how did Jesus respond to this demand? Did he castigate Thomas for doubting? Did he tell him to have blind faith? Did he even demand that he believe on the basis of the evidence he had already seen? No. Instead, he gave Thomas exactly what he asked for, letting him see with his own eyes the nail prints in his palms, letting him touch with his own hands the spear mark in his side \u2013 giving him the rock-solid, physical<\/i> evidence he needed to overcome his doubts.<\/p>\n
Well, I am a modern-day doubting Thomas. I want the same opportunity he had; I want the same level of evidence that he got. If I am to believe in Jesus, I want to see the nail scars in his palms with my own eyes and touch the spear wound in his side with my own hands. What could be fairer than that?<\/p>\n
Granted, the positive message of this story is soured somewhat by the next verse, in which Jesus tells Thomas, \u201cBecause you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed\u201d (John 20:29, NIV). But that does not affect the basic point of my request. Even if Jesus values blind faith more highly, he still granted Thomas\u2019 request. It would be inconsistent and unjust of him to answer one request for evidence, but turn down another, identical request and demand that the person believe anyway. If God is a God of justice, he will not present a less convincing case to some people than others and then punish them all equally for not believing. Why should God be more accessible in some time periods than others? Will Thomas go to Heaven while other people who could have been saved will instead go to Hell, merely because of the time and place of their birth?<\/p>\n
Believers may object to the idea of Jesus traveling from place to place to let each skeptic inspect his wounds personally, but again, what does it cost him? Why should he not do this? When the stakes are as high as the eternal fate of one\u2019s soul, no one should have to make a decision based on anything less than the very best evidence. (Imagine if the prosecutor in a criminal trial complained to the jury, \u201cI presented evidence in the last<\/i> case! I shouldn\u2019t have to do it every time. I\u2019m a famous prosecutor, so you should trust me when I say the defendant is guilty.\u201d) If he answered Thomas\u2019 request, it would be unjust for him to do anything less for the rest of us. Am I within my rights to ask to see the same evidence that was given to Thomas, or for that matter Saul, or Elijah? <\/p>\n
I have presented a version of the above argument to believers on several occasions, and the most common response is that I do not need to personally see such things, because all the testimony of these events is recorded in the Bible and I can read that instead. Such a reply misses the point entirely. What was given to Thomas, to Saul, and to the Israelites with Elijah was first-hand, eyewitness, physical evidence. The Bible, by comparison, is a book of unknown provenance containing hearsay stories written by anonymous authors in an uncertain time and place for the explicit purpose of propagandizing; a book of which we possess no original copies, making it impossible to tell how much these stories have changed since they were first recorded; a book passed down through the generations, copied and translated and recopied countless times with errors slowly accumulating all the while; a book that makes numerous claims that are impossible to verify, and other claims that blatantly contravene our present hard-won understanding of the way the world works; a book full of internal contradictions and clashes with science and history; a book, in short, that looks and feels just like all the rest of the dozens of books of mythology in this world in which people fervently believe. <\/p>\n
Such a tenuous and fragmentary chain of legend can never, ever replace a simple touch of the nail prints with one\u2019s own hands. The Bible itself testifies that we are entitled to more and better evidence than we currently have if we are to believe; therefore, if such evidence is not forthcoming, we are not only within our rights but obligated to reject it. If Elijah prayed before the Israelites and the fire would not come, or if Thomas\u2019 fellow disciples insisted Jesus was resurrected but could offer no tangible proof, would these people not have been within their rights to doubt? Would they not have been justified in demanding a bedrock of more solid proof upon which to build their belief? And if so, then are modern skeptics not similarly justified in withholding belief in the absence of better evidence? Can it really be a coincidence that God never acts in reality in the ways he is depicted as doing in the pages of the Bible?<\/p>\n
To believe a proposition in the absence of sufficient evidence is at best unwise, and at worst irresponsible and dangerous \u2013 consider how many wars have been started, and how many lives lost, throughout history by people\u2019s blind faith in political or religious leaders. Human history bears witness to the simple truth that the evidence \u2013 not desire, not expediency, and most definitely not faith \u2013 must always guide our steps. As this article has shown, even the Bible teaches this, though it is a lesson its writers doubtless never intended to convey. And until evidence shows the Bible to be true \u2013 until God can be seen to act in the way he routinely acts within the pages of this book \u2013 atheists will rightfully remain today\u2019s doubting Thomases. Until and unless the evidence can be provided, we will continue to warn humanity of the folly of theistic belief, pointing the way to a better future free of doubt, of hatred, and of fear.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
\u201cJesus answered him, \u2018It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.’\u201d \u2014Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do not believe in God is the lack of physical evidence. The observed facts simply do not support the existence of such a being, and therefore I believe […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1308,"featured_media":0,"parent":5349,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-5533","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"yoast_head":"\n
A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\""Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\""Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Daylight Atheism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-03-13T02:01:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/\",\"name\":\"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2013-02-03T17:37:35+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-03-13T02:01:43+00:00\",\"description\":\"\\\"Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'\\\" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Essays\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/\",\"name\":\"Daylight Atheism\",\"description\":\"Freethought in the light of the sun\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism","description":"\"Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'\" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism","og_description":"\"Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'\" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/","og_site_name":"Daylight Atheism","article_modified_time":"2021-03-13T02:01:43+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/","name":"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas - Daylight Atheism","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/#website"},"datePublished":"2013-02-03T17:37:35+00:00","dateModified":"2021-03-13T02:01:43+00:00","description":"\"Jesus answered him, 'It is also written: Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'\" —Matthew 4:7 (NIV) As an atheist, the principal reason I do","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/a-modern-day-doubting-thomas\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Essays","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/essays\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"A Modern-Day Doubting Thomas"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/","name":"Daylight Atheism","description":"Freethought in the light of the sun","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5533","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1308"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5533"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5533\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/5349"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/daylightatheism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5533"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}