{"id":8631,"date":"2011-11-15T05:48:58","date_gmt":"2011-11-15T11:48:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/deaconsbench\/?p=8631"},"modified":"2016-09-30T17:35:56","modified_gmt":"2016-09-30T21:35:56","slug":"obama-turns-his-back-on-catholics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/deaconsbench\/2011\/11\/obama-turns-his-back-on-catholics\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama “turns his back on Catholics”"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

Washington Post opinion writer (and former Bush speechwriter) Michael Gerson is adding his voice<\/a><\/strong> to the growing chorus of critics who charge the Obama White House is betraying its Catholic supporters:<\/p>\n

\n

\"\"<\/a>In 2009, the University of Notre Dame set off months of intra-Catholic controversy by inviting a champion of abortion rights to deliver the school\u2019s commencement address. When the day arrived, President Obama<\/a> skillfully deflated the tension. He extended a \u201cpresumption of good faith\u201d to his pro-life opponents. Then he promised Catholics that their pro-life convictions would be respected by his administration. \u201cLet\u2019s honor the conscience of those who disagree with abortion,\u201d he said, \u201cand draft a sensible conscience clause, and make sure that all of our health-care policies are grounded not only in sound science but also in clear ethics, as well as respect for the equality of women.\u201d<\/p>\n

Catholics, eager for reassurance from a leader whom 54 percent of them<\/a> had supported, were duly reassured. But Obama\u2019s statement had the awkward subordinate clauses of a contentious speech-writing process. Qualifications and code words produced a pledge that pledged little.<\/p>\n

Now the conscience protections of Catholics are under assault, particularly by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). And Obama\u2019s Catholic strategy is in shambles.<\/p>\n

Shortly before Obama spoke at Notre Dame, the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts brought suit against the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), seeking to eliminate a grant to programs that aid victims of human trafficking. Because Catholic programs don\u2019t refer for abortions, the ACLU alleged that public support amounts to the establishment of religion.<\/p>\n

The Obama Justice Department defended the grant in court. But last month, HHS abruptly ended the funding<\/a>. It did not matter that an independent review board had rated the bishops\u2019 program more effective than those of its competitors \u2014 or that career HHS employees objected to the politicized handling of the grant. HHS announced it was giving preference to grantees that offer \u201cthe full range of legally permissible gynecological and obstetric care.\u201d This was described by one official as \u201cstandard procedure.\u201d So it is now standard procedure in the Obama administration to deny funding to some Catholic programs based solely on their pro-life beliefs.<\/p>\n

The process that produced the HHS decision remains murky. The USCCB has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for more details. But it is difficult to imagine that HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius<\/a> was not involved in a matter of this much obvious controversy. Sebelius \u2014 an outspoken pro-choice Catholic \u2014 has a long history of conflict with Catholic authorities\u2026<\/p>\n

\u2026\u201cWe are in a war,\u201d Sebelius told a recent pro-choice meeting<\/a>. Opponents of the administration, she said, are trying to \u201croll back the last 50 years in progress women have made in comprehensive health care in America.\u201d This is no longer the \u201cpresumption of good faith.\u201d It has all the hallmarks of a vendetta.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest. <\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

RELATED: <\/strong><\/p>\n