I\u2019m all for tolerance and civility.\u00a0 Amen brothers.\u00a0 However, I\u2019m also for logic, nuance, and context.\u00a0 I\u2019m for being aware of our moment.\u00a0 I would hope any writers for Christianity Today<\/em> are for the same.\u00a0 If so, we don\u2019t find it here<\/a>.\u00a0 Here are false equivalencies and poor analysis.<\/p>\n I get the need to appear above the fray and to sort of project that, \u201cHey, I\u2019m the teacher or parent here\u2014I\u2019m the neutral observer who just happened upon a dispute.\u00a0 I will now break it up and set forth my judgment\u2013let\u2019s all play nice, okay,\u201d vibe.\u00a0 I get that.<\/p>\n However, if we want to weigh in here, regarding these events and times\u2014we are neither the teacher nor parent.\u00a0 No one, given the gravity of these events, our time, is above this fray.\u00a0 If anyone thinks they are, they are a victim of hubris or hopelessly self-unaware.\u00a0 Either recognize that or get out of the conversation. \u00a0You are not helping.<\/p>\n Here is the poor analysis:<\/p>\n \u201cWhat is transpiring today is the clash of two completely different worldviews\u2014an accelerated culture of secularism facing off against an aging culture of Christendom.\u201d<\/p>\n While true in a very general way, it fails to capture what is happening in regard to the point of their essay.\u00a0 What is transpiring today is actually the result of a white, Christian nationalist<\/a>, fundamentalist movement, that ingratiated themselves into the Republican Party to gain political power.\u00a0 This started with Jerry Falwell\u2019s Moral Majority back in 1979 and continued, even if under different movements and leaders, up to the present day.<\/p>\n Was this a reaction to secularism?\u00a0 Yes (partly), and a misguided one since it mimics secularism (pure will, power), but such hardly explains our current moment in the political world.\u00a0 In reality, what is happening is probably one of the greatest capitulations to the secular, in our lifetimes.<\/p>\n The fact fundamentalists and evangelicals talked about the importance of honesty, character, integrity, and ethics in political leaders for decades, but then threw all that out the window to support Trump, is hardly the result of secularism.\u00a0 It is, however, a surrender to the secular, in its purest, amoral, Machiavellian aspect.<\/p>\n What we see happening presently, is the result of a fundamentalist Christianity, a truncated and immature view of the Christian narrative, and the world, which far too many evangelicals also bought into when it came to the political (also it helped being discipled by Fox News).\u00a0 We need to quit blaming others and take a look in the mirror.<\/p>\n Here is the false equivalency:<\/p>\n After noting the obvious fact that, \u201c\u2026[Trump] has riled up some right-wing conservative evangelicals who have adopted such tone and rhetoric that dismisses, discredits, and demonizes the other side\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n We are then told that the other side, the left, whatever one wants to call it, is guilty of the same.\u00a0 And here is the example given:<\/p>\n \u201cHowever, the same is true for many on the left. Elizabeth Warren mocking response<\/a> to a question posed to her at the most recent Equality Town Hall was telling. She pretty much dismisses anyone\u2014particularly a man who would hold a traditional view of marriage.\u201d<\/p>\n First of all, even if the response was mocking, my goodness, is that what we are going to hold up as an example of, \u201cdemonizing?\u201d\u00a0 Second, the response is more satiric with a wink, than mocking, which was a mercy quite frankly.\u00a0 The one who asked the question mistakenly wandered into an adult conversation with an adult candidate.\u00a0 Given the naivety of the question, he was fortunate she was so reserved and didn\u2019t embarrass him further.<\/p>\n She didn\u2019t ask for the question.\u00a0 She was being polite.\u00a0 She could have responded much more forcefully.\u00a0 The point we, rather, should take from her response, is if the world, and much of the Christian world, has moved on, then make your argument rather than ask questions so easily dismissed.\u00a0 But I digress.\u00a0 The point is that her response hardly rises to the level of the acidic poison pouring forth regularly from the other side.<\/p>\n It is the Trump side<\/a> that needs to be lectured about civility and tolerance.\u00a0 What lapses or failures are evident on the other side, pale in comparison.\u00a0 Do they need to do better?\u00a0 Sure.\u00a0 But to lay them alongside what we\u2019ve seen from Trump and his followers as somehow comparable, is frankly ridiculous.\u00a0 Come on.\u00a0 Be serious.\u00a0 If you want to be taken seriously, then you have to make a serious comparison.<\/p>\n Compare Warren\u2019s response (I\u2019m not a supporter by-the-way) to this<\/a>, this<\/a>, this<\/a>, and this<\/a>.\u00a0 To assert Warren\u2019s response is an equal example of what we find in these examples, or in general, from Trump and company\u2014is laughable.\u00a0 It only further reveals how seemingly out of tune evangelicals are, how tone deaf they are to our current crisis\u2014a crisis they helped (81%) create!\u00a0 Trump and his supporters have turned the idea of civility and tolerance on its head.\u00a0 Knowing they could not win with rational, or ethical arguments and policies, they have made insult, bullying, and the low road their only path.<\/p>\n Evangelical Christianity is whistling past the graveyard at this point.\u00a0 These so-called moderate voices think they are somehow helping by staying above the fray.\u00a0 I will put the lie to such fantasies.\u00a0 Imagine it\u2019s the 1960s and we are in the midst of the Civil Rights Movement.\u00a0 Or imagine one is a Christian in Nazi Germany in the late 1930s.\u00a0 Those who came out and tried to mediate as neutral observers, tried to stay above the fray, tried to tell us both sides were the same (\u201cgood people on both sides\u201d), that both needed to tone it down, who did they end up helping?\u00a0 The oppressors, those whose incivility and intolerance are intrinsic to their very movement, philosophy, and existence.<\/p>\n History, rightly so, has not been kind to those voices.\u00a0 I have the feeling history will see these current voices in the same light.\u00a0 In their very commendable attempt to promote civility and tolerance, they miss the gravity of our current moment with their false equivalencies and poor analysis of the moment.\u00a0 In seeking to promote the good, they invariably end up helping those who have decided they will do the very opposite.<\/p>\n These writers have forgotten the words of Elie Wiesel:<\/p>\n \u201cWe must take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented.\u201d<\/p>\n