{"id":5175,"date":"2008-01-17T16:15:28","date_gmt":"2008-01-17T16:15:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/"},"modified":"2008-01-17T16:15:28","modified_gmt":"2008-01-17T16:15:28","slug":"self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/","title":{"rendered":"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>Sharing some interesting news\u2026 have fun<\/p>\n<p><b>A giant palm tree <\/b>\u2013 which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites \u2013 which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/science\/nature\/7193161.stm\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">self destructing<\/a> tree!<\/p>\n<p><b>Is Science an Art?<\/b>  Well <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seedmagazine.com\/news\/2008\/01\/the_future_of_scienceis_art.php\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">Neils Bohr<\/a> certainly seemed to think so!  He thought electrons were closer to Picasso\u2019s world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bohr\u2019s discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren\u2019t like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso\u2019s deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><!--break--><\/p>\n<p>Ever fantasize being invisible?  Well, your wish may come true very soon.  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wired.com\/wired\/archive\/11.08\/pwr_invisible.html\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">Mr. Tachi<\/a> of Univ of Tokyo has a prototype of the cloak, wearing which you could become invisible!  Naah.. its not a movie stunt.. or may be it is\u2026<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Susumu Tachi, an engineering professor at the University of Tokyo, demonstrated a crude invisibility cloak. Through the clever application of some dirt-cheap technology, the Japanese inventor has brought personal invisibility a step closer to reality.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sharing some interesting news&#8230; have fun<\/p>\n<p><b>A giant palm tree <\/b>&#8211; which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites &#8211; which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/science\/nature\/7193161.stm\" target=\"_blank\">self destructing<\/a> tree!<\/p>\n<p><b>Is Science an Art?<\/b>  Well <a href=\"http:\/\/www.seedmagazine.com\/news\/2008\/01\/the_future_of_scienceis_art.php\" target=\"_blank\">Neils Bohr<\/a> certainly seemed to think so!  He thought electrons were closer to Picasso&#8217;s world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Bohr&#8217;s discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren&#8217;t like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso&#8217;s deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"author":1517,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[47],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso&#039;s world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr&#039;s discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren&#039;t like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso&#039;s deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso&#039;s world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr&#039;s discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren&#039;t like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso&#039;s deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Drishtikone\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Desh Kapoor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Desh Kapoor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/\",\"name\":\"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/e24bcebf9da3425dd595b71543245311\"},\"description\":\"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso's world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr's discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren't like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso's deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/\",\"name\":\"Drishtikone\",\"description\":\"Perspective on Life and World from Hindu and Indian standpoints\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/e24bcebf9da3425dd595b71543245311\",\"name\":\"Desh Kapoor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3cc132f0b1d11236e6dc28b12e598a23?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3cc132f0b1d11236e6dc28b12e598a23?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Desh Kapoor\"},\"description\":\"Making sense of the world via the perspective of Dharma and Hinduism. Drishtikone literally means \\\"View from an Angle\\\" in Hindi. It is a word used for \\\"Perspective\\\" in Hindi conversations.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/author\/drishtikone\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak","description":"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso's world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr's discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren't like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso's deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak","og_description":"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso's world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr's discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren't like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso's deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/","og_site_name":"Drishtikone","article_published_time":"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00","author":"Desh Kapoor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Desh Kapoor","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/","name":"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00","dateModified":"2008-01-17T16:15:28+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/e24bcebf9da3425dd595b71543245311"},"description":"Sharing some interesting news... have fun A giant palm tree - which can be seen on Google Earth\/satellites - which spends so much energy it collapses and dies.. a self destructing tree! Is Science an Art? Well Neils Bohr certainly seemed to think so! He thought electrons were closer to Picasso's world than to the science of revolving bodies of the Universe: Bohr's discerning conviction was that the invisible world of the electron was essentially a cubist world. By 1923, de Broglie had already determined that electrons could exist as either particles or waves. What Bohr maintained was that the form they took depended on how you looked at them. Their very nature was a consequence of our observation. This meant that electrons weren't like little planets at all. Instead, they were like one of Picasso's deconstructed guitars, a blur of brushstrokes that only made sense once you stared at it. The art that looked so strange was actually telling the truth.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/2008\/01\/self-destructing-plant-science-art-and-invisibilizing-cloak\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Self Destructing Plant, Science is Art and the Invisibilizing Cloak"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/","name":"Drishtikone","description":"Perspective on Life and World from Hindu and Indian standpoints","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/e24bcebf9da3425dd595b71543245311","name":"Desh Kapoor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3cc132f0b1d11236e6dc28b12e598a23?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3cc132f0b1d11236e6dc28b12e598a23?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Desh Kapoor"},"description":"Making sense of the world via the perspective of Dharma and Hinduism. Drishtikone literally means \"View from an Angle\" in Hindi. It is a word used for \"Perspective\" in Hindi conversations.","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/author\/drishtikone\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5175"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5175\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/drishtikone\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}