Note: I\u2019m changing the identification codes on the posts for clarity. \u00a0I initially called my \u201cJenkins Response\u201d meaning my response to Jenkins. \u00a0Then when Prof. Jenkins started posting I called them \u201cJenkins Rejoinder\u201d because \u201cresponse\u201d was already used. \u00a0From now on I\u2019m going to call my posts \u201cHamblin\u201d and prof. Jenkins\u2019 posts \u201cJenkins.\u201d<\/p>\n
Dear Philip,<\/p>\n
You need to remember that you are a guest on my blog. \u00a0I have attempted to let you have your say in a completely unfettered way. \u00a0In reply you\u2019ve treated me and my colleagues with thinly disguised or overt contempt. \u00a0In the future could you please try not to rant and insult LDS scholars?<\/p>\n
Thanks<\/p>\n
Bill<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Note: I\u2019m changing the identification codes on the posts for clarity. \u00a0I initially called my \u201cJenkins Response\u201d meaning my response to Jenkins. \u00a0Then when Prof. Jenkins started posting I called them \u201cJenkins Rejoinder\u201d because \u201cresponse\u201d was already used. \u00a0From now on I\u2019m going to call my posts \u201cHamblin\u201d and prof. Jenkins\u2019 posts \u201cJenkins.\u201d Dear Philip, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1814,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[61,38,52,450,40,57],"tags":[461],"class_list":["post-2535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ancient-studies","category-book-of-mormon","category-church-of-jesus-christ-of-latter-day-saints","category-historicity-history","category-mormon-studies","category-mormonism","tag-philip-jenkins"],"yoast_head":"\n