We sign fewer petitions, belong to fewer organizations that meet, know our neighbors less, meet with friends less frequently, and even socialize with our families less often. We\u2019re even bowling alone [Source: Bowling Alone<\/a>].<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Putnam\u2019s analysis of the causes was pretty nuanced (read: no-one really knows), but he did point out that the decline of religion in the US has gone hand in hand with the decline in other forms of so-called \u2018social capital\u2019.<\/p>\n In his latest book, American Grace, Putnam goes a bit further, arguing that religion is a kind of social glue. Take a look at this, from a review of the book<\/a>:<\/p>\n Religious Americans are better citizens than non-religious ones (they give more to secular <\/i>causes, volunteer more for secular <\/i>causes, and join more, to mention a few markers of good citizenship). However, it is not their particular theology that predicts good citizenship, but the extent to which they are embedded in a friendship network of religious others (regardless of their religion). [Putnam refers to these religious friends as \u201cpowerful, supercharged friends.\u201d]\u00a0<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Well, so much for the USA. What about godless Europe? <\/b><\/p>\n Europe must be in a pretty parlous state, without religion to bind communities together! You might think so, couple of pieces of recent research suggest that simple assumption is not really warranted.<\/p>\n Anna Rita Manca, of the ominous-sounding EU Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, crunched through some data from the European Social Survey and found that, sure enough, religious Europeans score highest on \u2018Social Capital\u2019.<\/p>\n By \u2018social capital\u2019 she\u2019s talking about two kinds of activity: <\/p>\n Religious people come out higher on social engagement but not private engagement \u2013 not too surprising when you look and see that being a member of a religious organisation scores you a point!<\/p>\n But let\u2019s not worry about that, because there\u2019s something much more interesting going on.<\/p>\n Take a look at this figure, which shows average levels of social capital (both social and private) in European Countries.<\/p>\n In the top right of the graph, in the area representing high levels of social capital, who should we find but our old friends the Nordic countries!<\/p>\n In fact, there\u2019s a general trend here \u2013 those countries with the least religion have the most social capital. And that\u2019s despite the fact that, even in Nordic countries, religious individuals tend to score higher.<\/p>\n We\u2019ve been here before. In fact, this seems to be quite a common trend. When you question individuals about their behaviour, the non-religious often seem to come out worse. And yet, when you look at nations, those with the fewest religious people regularly come out on top on a range of social issues.<\/p>\n So what does the future hold? Perhaps, you\u2019re thinking those Nordic countries would come out even higher if they still had their religion. Perhaps they are declining from a golden age some time in their religous past?<\/p>\n Well that\u2019s where research from Francesco Sarracino, at the University of Florence in Italy, comes in. Sarracino used a broad array of measures of social capital, including trust, unpaid voluntary work, and membership in organisations (including religious ones).<\/p>\n He found that, in the period 1980-2000, social capital had increased overall in virtually all European countries \u2013 despite declining Church going and declining trust in Church institutions. Sweden, Denmark and Norway have all seen increases in social capital over that time \u2013 and this was matched by an increase in well being.<\/p>\n There was one exception to this general European trend: the UK. Now, of all European nations, the UK is most like the USA. Over the past 20 years, social capital in the UK has generally gone down \u2013 and the people of the UK have become unhappier.<\/p>\n To me, this says that religion is unimportant for social capital. Rather, there is some shared disease that is corroding society in both the UK and in the USA. If our leaders are genuinely interested in stopping the rot, they should worry less about religion and instead figure out what the real disease is.<\/p>\n Sarracino, F. (2010). Social capital and subjective well-being trends: Comparing 11 western European countries Journal of Socio-Economics, 39<\/span> (4), 482-517 DOI: 10.1016\/j.socec.2009.10.010<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n Ten years ago, the sociologist Robert Putnam created shockwaves with his analysis of the breakdown of US society in recent decades \u2013 We sign fewer petitions, belong to fewer organizations that meet, know our neighbors less, meet with friends less frequently, and even socialize with our families less often. We\u2019re even bowling alone [Source: Bowling […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n\n
at improving the society at large (cultural, human rights, social, religious<\/b><\/i>, environmental\/peace organization).<\/li>\n
respondent (sport, trade union, business, teacher\/parents, political party).<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n![](\"https:\/\/lh5.googleusercontent.com\/-esAjm1GlGB8\/TXv1BnF7yXI\/AAAAAAAAAwQ\/IT8PQiQ6Dr0\/s400\/Mascherini_EU_social_capital.png\")
<\/a><\/div>\n
\n![\"ResearchBlogging.org\"](\"https:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_large_gray.png\")
<\/a><\/span>Mascherini, M., Vidoni, D., & Manca, A. (2010). Exploring the Determinants of Civil Participation in 14 European Countries: One-Size-Fits None European Sociological Review<\/span> DOI: 10.1093\/esr\/jcq041<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n![\"Creative](\"https:\/\/i.creativecommons.org\/l\/by-sa\/2.0\/uk\/88x31.png\")
<\/a><\/span> This article by Tom Rees<\/b> was first published on Epiphenom<\/a>. It is licensed under Creative Commons<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"