{"id":358,"date":"2009-09-18T22:39:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-18T21:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus-personal-ethics-what-doctors-think.html"},"modified":"2014-11-22T00:20:53","modified_gmt":"2014-11-21T23:20:53","slug":"professional-obligations-versus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html","title":{"rendered":"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong. Apparently they are. This is in line with the well-known fact that religious people are more likely to have authoritarian natures.<\/p>\n<p>But it doesn\u2019t necessarily follow that religious people are more likely to obey authorities if those authorities are religious. There\u2019s some good evidence of this from studies of physicians. The most recent has just been published in the journal <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Academic Medicine<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>The study lead was Farr Curlin, from the University of Chicago. Back in 2007 he published a survey which asked US physicians whether they are obliged to refer patients if the patients want a treatment to which they are entitled but which the physician objects to on personal ethical grounds. Abortion is a classic example.<\/p>\n<p>Now, the rules on this are in fact murky. But, as <a href=\"http:\/\/www.law.utoronto.ca\/faculty_content.asp?itemPath=1\/3\/0\/0\/0&amp;profile=19&amp;cType=facMembers\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Bernard Dickens<\/a>, Professor of Health Law and Policy at the University of Toronto, wrote in a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/19705646\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">paper<\/a> earlier this year:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The right to conscientious objection is founded on human rights to act according to individuals\u2019 religious and other conscience. Domestic and international human rights laws recognize such entitlements. Healthcare providers cannot be discriminated against, for instance in employment, on the basis of their beliefs. They are required, however, to be equally respectful of rights to conscience of patients and potential patients. They cannot invoke their human rights to violate the human rights of others. There are legal limits to conscientious objection. Laws in some jurisdictions unethically abuse religious conscience by granting excessive rights to refuse care. In general, healthcare providers owe duties of care to patients that may conflict with their refusal of care on grounds of conscience.<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"> The reconciliation of patients\u2019 rights to care and providers\u2019 rights of conscientious objection is in the duty of objectors in good faith to refer their patients to reasonably accessible providers who are known not to object.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, if s doctor refuses to provide a service on moral grounds, they have an obligation to refer.<\/p>\n<p>What Curlin found was widespread disagreement with this basic principle among the religious. Nearly half of all physicians with high \u2018<a href=\"http:\/\/hirr.hartsem.edu\/ency\/Intrinsic-Extrinsic.htm\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">intrinsic religiosity<\/a>\u2018 rejected it, as did 40% of those who went to church twice a month or more. It was rejected by less than 20% of non-religious physicians.<a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/492\/2009\/09\/Curlin_2009_physicians_obligations.png\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-2261\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/492\/2009\/09\/Curlin_2009_physicians_obligations.png\" alt=\"Curlin_2009_physicians_obligations\" width=\"411\" height=\"312\"><\/a>Scroll forward to 2009, and Curlin has done a follow up survey (again in the USA). This time, he specifically asked doctors whether they agreed or disagreed witht he statement \u201cSometimes physicians have a professional ethical obligation to provide medical services even if they personally believe it would be morally wrong to do so.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The results probably aren\u2019t quite what you\u2019d expect.<\/p>\n<p>For Christians versus atheists, there\u2019s a clear difference. Christians were more likely to reject the idea that they have a professional obligation to provide services they find immoral.<\/p>\n<p>But Hindus and Muslims were much more open to the idea. In fact they seem more open to the idea of professional obligations trumping personal reservations.<\/p>\n<p>Curlin explains these differences in two ways. Firstly, in cultural terms:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The idea that physicians should never act against conscience follows from a long Western tradition, expressed in the maxim, \u201cLet your conscience be your guide.\u201d This tradition is rooted in part in Catholic moral theology, which says that an individual \u201cmust always obey the certain judgment of his conscience. If he were deliberately to act against it, he would condemn himself.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To me, this doesn\u2019t seem very likely. The atheists in his survey probably have mostly a \u2018Christian culture\u2019 heritage. And yet they accept professional obligations.<\/p>\n<p>Curlin also found that immigrants are more likely to prioritise their professional obligations, and writes that:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u2026this finding may indicate that immigrants make a special effort to accommodate and adapt to what they perceive to be the expectations of the host culture.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It would be interesting to do this study in India, to see if the findings are different. But it might explain the atheists responses \u2013 as a minority group, they might be more inclined to see the value of having professional rules that apply to everyone.<\/p>\n<p>Alternatively, it might be that the ones who have the biggest problems with the rules are the Christians. After all, the rules tend to allow medical procedures that are anathema to some religious authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Atheists, on the other hand, have no rule book to follow except the commonly agreed standards of the society in which they live.<\/p>\n<p>____________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"padding: 5px; float: right;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: 0pt none;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_large_gray.png\" alt=\"ResearchBlogging.org\"><\/a><\/span><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=Academic+medicine+%3A+journal+of+the+Association+of+American+Medical+Colleges&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19707071&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=Physicians%27+beliefs+about+conscience+in+medicine%3A+a+national+survey.&amp;rft.issn=1040-2446&amp;rft.date=2009&amp;rft.volume=84&amp;rft.issue=9&amp;rft.spage=1276&amp;rft.epage=82&amp;rft.artnum=&amp;rft.au=Lawrence+RE&amp;rft.au=Curlin+FA&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Social+Science%2CHealth%2CMedical+Ethics%2C+Religion\">Curlin, F., Lawrence, R., Chin, M., &amp; Lantos, J. (2007). Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Clinical Practices <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">New England Journal of Medicine, 356<\/span> (6), 593-600 DOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1056\/NEJMsa065316\" rev=\"review\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">10.1056\/NEJMsa065316<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=Academic+medicine+%3A+journal+of+the+Association+of+American+Medical+Colleges&amp;rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F19707071&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=Physicians%27+beliefs+about+conscience+in+medicine%3A+a+national+survey.&amp;rft.issn=1040-2446&amp;rft.date=2009&amp;rft.volume=84&amp;rft.issue=9&amp;rft.spage=1276&amp;rft.epage=82&amp;rft.artnum=&amp;rft.au=Lawrence+RE&amp;rft.au=Curlin+FA&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Social+Science%2CHealth%2CMedical+Ethics%2C+Religion\">Lawrence RE, &amp; Curlin FA (2009). Physicians\u2019 beliefs about conscience in medicine: a national survey. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 84<\/span> (9), 1276-82 PMID: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/19707071\" rev=\"review\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">19707071<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"float: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/uk\/\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border-width: 0pt;\" src=\"https:\/\/i.creativecommons.org\/l\/by-sa\/2.0\/uk\/88x31.png\" alt=\"Creative Commons License\"><\/a><\/span>This work by <a href=\"http:\/\/bhascience.blogspot.com\/\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Tom Rees<\/a> is licensed under a <a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-sa\/2.0\/uk\/\" rel=\"nofollow\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England &amp; Wales License<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong. Apparently they are. This is in line with the well-known fact that religious people are more likely to have authoritarian natures. But it doesn\u2019t necessarily follow that [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-358","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-18T21:39:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-11-21T23:20:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/files\/2009\/09\/Curlin_2009_physicians_obligations.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html\",\"name\":\"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-18T21:39:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-11-21T23:20:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\"},\"description\":\"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"description\":\"The science of religion and non-belief\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Epiphenom\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think","description":"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think","og_description":"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html","og_site_name":"Epiphenom","article_published_time":"2009-09-18T21:39:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-11-21T23:20:53+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/files\/2009\/09\/Curlin_2009_physicians_obligations.png"}],"author":"Epiphenom","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Epiphenom","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html","name":"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-18T21:39:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-11-21T23:20:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1"},"description":"In the last post, I reported on a study into whether religious people are more likely to support the Supreme Court to judge matters of right and wrong.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/09\/professional-obligations-versus.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Professional obligations versus personal ethics: what doctors think"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/","name":"Epiphenom","description":"The science of religion and non-belief","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1","name":"Epiphenom","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Epiphenom"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2091"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=358"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/358\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=358"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=358"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=358"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}