{"id":449,"date":"2009-02-14T07:35:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-14T06:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social-conservatism.html"},"modified":"2014-12-07T05:45:12","modified_gmt":"2014-12-07T04:45:12","slug":"how-religion-generates-social","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html","title":{"rendered":"How religion generates social conservatism"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p>You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are, of course, more likely than non-religious adults to say that animals exist for a purpose.<\/p>\n<p>But what about men and women? Black people and whites? Rich and poor? Arab and Jew? Do these exist for a purpose? And is it possible for one to become another? Gil Diesdendruck and Lital Haber of Bar-Ilan University in Israel decided to find out what children think.<\/p>\n<p>They tested 64 Jewish girls and boys aged 7-12 years. Public education in Israel is heavily segregated, and they took half their sample from a secular school and half from an orthodox school. Each child was shown a series of picture pairs \u2013 animals (elephants and lions), artefacts (chairs and tables), ethnicity (Arabs and Jews), sex (men and women), race (black and white), and wealth (rich and poor).<a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/492\/2009\/02\/Diesendruck_2009_teleology.gif\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright  wp-image-2354\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/492\/2009\/02\/Diesendruck_2009_teleology.gif\" alt=\"Diesendruck_2009_teleology\" width=\"478\" height=\"395\"><\/a>They were then shown a little story, in which two dolls discussed whether these different categories exist for a purpose, e.g., \u2018\u2018Danny says that rich people exist for a purpose. Yossi says that rich people exist for no purpose, they just exist\u201d. The children were then asked who was right.<\/p>\n<p>There were big differences between the two groups, shown in the figure here. Orthodox kids were much more likely to say that Arabs and Jews exist for a specific purpose, as do blacks and whites and, revealingly, rich and poor.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, they think that all these types exist because they have a specific role to play, usually mandated by god. You can see here the seed of adult-life social conservatism.<\/p>\n<p>They also asked the kids whether it was possible for one type to become another. Whether an Arab could become a Jew, or a poor person become rich. While they broadly agreed on animals, artefacts, and wealth, orthodox kids were more likely to say that sex, race and ethnicity are fixed (they have \u2018essential\u2019 properties).<\/p>\n<p>These differences become even more stark when you split the kids not according to whether they were orthodox or secular, but according to whether they thought that God had created each of the categories in question. Of course, orthodox kids were more likely to think this, but not all of them did (and, conversely, some secular kids did).<\/p>\n<p>The kids who thought that god created race, ethnicity, and gender were significantly more likely to think that this categories were created for a purpose and also that they were stable (you can\u2019t change from one to another). Although they thought that socio-economic status and animals were also created for a purpose, but weren\u2019t more likely to think that these categories were stable.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s what Diesendruck and Haber conclude:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u2026 our findings indicate that children\u2019s essentialist beliefs about animals, and their teleological construal of artifacts, come to them intuitively and independently of creationism. In turn, children\u2019s extension of essentialism to particular social categories, and teleology to both social categories and animals, are reflective, and result from the communication of a culturally constituted belief system \u2013 i.e., creationism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In other words, if you teach kids creationism \u2013 not just about animals, but about people \u2013 you train them to think that they have a specific purpose (in the same way that secular kids think about artefacts such as pencils, tables and chairs).<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s no wonder, then, that they grow up to be social conservatives \u2013 fearing women and gay rights, accepting wide differences in social equality, and reinforcing the ethnic schisms within society.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"padding: 5px; float: left;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"border: 0pt none;\" src=\"https:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_large_gray.png\" alt=\"ResearchBlogging.org\"><\/a><\/span><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=Cognition&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1016%2Fj.cognition.2008.11.001&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=God%E2%80%99s+categories%3A+The+effect+of+religiosity+on+children%E2%80%99s+teleological+and+essentialist+beliefs+about+categories%E2%98%86&amp;rft.issn=00100277&amp;rft.date=2009&amp;rft.volume=110&amp;rft.issue=1&amp;rft.spage=100&amp;rft.epage=114&amp;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS001002770800259X&amp;rft.au=G+DIESENDRUCK&amp;rft.au=L+HABER&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Psychology%2CReligion\">G DIESENDRUCK, L HABER (2009). God\u2019s categories: The effect of religiosity on children\u2019s teleological and essentialist beliefs about categories. <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Cognition, 110<\/span> (1), 100-114. DOI: <a href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cognition.2008.11.001\" rev=\"review\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">10.1016\/j.cognition.2008.11.001<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are, of course, more likely than non-religious adults to say that animals exist for a purpose. But what about men and women? Black people and whites? Rich and poor? Arab and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>How religion generates social conservatism<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How religion generates social conservatism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-14T06:35:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-07T04:45:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/files\/2009\/02\/Diesendruck_2009_teleology.gif\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html\",\"name\":\"How religion generates social conservatism\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-14T06:35:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-07T04:45:12+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\"},\"description\":\"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How religion generates social conservatism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"description\":\"The science of religion and non-belief\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Epiphenom\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How religion generates social conservatism","description":"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How religion generates social conservatism","og_description":"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html","og_site_name":"Epiphenom","article_published_time":"2009-02-14T06:35:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-07T04:45:12+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/files\/2009\/02\/Diesendruck_2009_teleology.gif"}],"author":"Epiphenom","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Epiphenom","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html","name":"How religion generates social conservatism","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-14T06:35:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-07T04:45:12+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1"},"description":"You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2009\/02\/how-religion-generates-social.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How religion generates social conservatism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/","name":"Epiphenom","description":"The science of religion and non-belief","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1","name":"Epiphenom","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Epiphenom"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2091"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/449\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}