{"id":487,"date":"2008-12-08T21:56:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-08T21:56:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html"},"modified":"2008-12-08T21:56:00","modified_gmt":"2008-12-08T21:56:00","slug":"god-damned-nanotechnology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html","title":{"rendered":"God-damned nanotechnology"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_8sY9bx8acNM\/ST2FvXDP36I\/AAAAAAAAAPE\/XLdEw00MbsA\/s1600-h\/nano.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px;float: right;cursor: pointer;width: 400px;height: 304px\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_8sY9bx8acNM\/ST2FvXDP36I\/AAAAAAAAAPE\/XLdEw00MbsA\/s400\/nano.jpg\" alt=\"\" id=\"BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5277521387036073890\" border=\"0\"><\/a>Earlier this year <a href=\"http:\/\/bhascience.blogspot.com\/2008\/02\/nanotech-against-god-and-probably.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">this blog reported<\/a> on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study \u2013 Dietram A. Scheufele at the University of Wisconsin \u2013 reckoned that the differences were in part due to differences in the prevalence of religious belief.<\/p>\n<p>Well, now he\u2019s done the analysis to back this up, and it\u2019s been published in <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Nature Nanotechnology<\/span>. It turns out that the level of religious fervour is the most important factor in determining public acceptance to nanotechnology.<\/p>\n<p>The correlation held even after controlling for other factors that influence attitudes to nanotechnology, like science literacy, educational performance, and levels of research productivity and funding directed to science and technology by different countries. And not only are religious countries more against nanotech, they are also less likely to think that nanotech is useful. In other words, their religious-based dislike of the <span style=\"font-style: italic\">idea<\/span> of nanotech crosses over and affects their beliefs about the utility of it.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The survey findings, says Scheufele, are important not only because they reveal the paradox of citizens of one of the world\u2019s elite technological societies taking a dim view of the implications of a particular technology, but also because they begin to expose broader negative public attitudes toward science when people filter their views through religion.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat we captured is nanospecific, but it is also representative of a larger attitude toward science and technology,\u201d Scheufele says. \u201cIt raises a big question: What\u2019s really going on in our public discourse where science and religion often clash?\u201d (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.eurekalert.org\/pub_releases\/2008-12\/uow-fnr120408.php\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">Press release<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>So why do religious people have the heebie jeebies about nanotech? The study doesn\u2019t answer that one, although it is likely to be similar to their <a href=\"http:\/\/bhascience.blogspot.com\/2008\/03\/catholics-on-human-animal-hybrids.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">abhorrence of hybrid embryos<\/a>. It smacks of human beings getting too clever for their own good and playing god.<\/p>\n<p>But the implications for science communication are clear. This research fits into a wider picture of how public attitudes to science are shaped. Simple communication of facts will not change attitudes to science. You need to change worldviews.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"padding: 5px\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"ResearchBlogging.org\" src=\"https:\/\/www.researchblogging.org\/public\/citation_icons\/rb2_large_gray.png\" style=\"border: 0pt none\"><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"Z3988\" title=\"ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&amp;rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&amp;rft.jtitle=Nature+Nanotechnology&amp;rft_id=info%3Adoi%2F10.1038%2FNNANO.2008.361&amp;rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fresearchblogging.org&amp;rft.atitle=Religious+beliefs+and+public+attitudes+toward+nanotechnology+in+Europe+and+the+United+States&amp;rft.issn=1748-3387&amp;rft.date=2008&amp;rft.volume=&amp;rft.issue=&amp;rft.spage=0&amp;rft.epage=0&amp;rft.artnum=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Fdoifinder%2F10.1038%2Fnnano.2008.361&amp;rft.au=Dietram+A.+Scheufele&amp;rft.au=Elizabeth+A.+Corley&amp;rft.au=Tsung-jen+Shih&amp;rft.au=Kajsa+E.+Dalrymple&amp;rft.au=Shirley+S.+Ho&amp;rfe_dat=bpr3.included=1;bpr3.tags=Physics%2CSocial+Science%2CReligion%2C+Sociology%2C+Nanoscience\">Dietram A. Scheufele, Elizabeth A. Corley, Tsung-jen Shih, Kajsa E. Dalrymple, Shirley S. Ho (2008). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States <span style=\"font-style: italic\">Nature Nanotechnology<\/span> DOI: <a rev=\"review\" href=\"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1038\/NNANO.2008.361\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">10.1038\/NNANO.2008.361<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study \u2013 Dietram A. Scheufele at the University of Wisconsin \u2013 reckoned that the differences were in part due to differences in the prevalence of religious belief. Well, now he\u2019s done the analysis [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2091,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>God-damned nanotechnology<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"God-damned nanotechnology\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_8sY9bx8acNM\/ST2FvXDP36I\/AAAAAAAAAPE\/XLdEw00MbsA\/s400\/nano.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Epiphenom\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html\",\"name\":\"God-damned nanotechnology\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\"},\"description\":\"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"God-damned nanotechnology\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"description\":\"The science of religion and non-belief\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1\",\"name\":\"Epiphenom\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Epiphenom\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"God-damned nanotechnology","description":"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"God-damned nanotechnology","og_description":"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html","og_site_name":"Epiphenom","article_published_time":"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_8sY9bx8acNM\/ST2FvXDP36I\/AAAAAAAAAPE\/XLdEw00MbsA\/s400\/nano.jpg"}],"author":"Epiphenom","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Epiphenom","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html","name":"God-damned nanotechnology","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00","dateModified":"2008-12-08T21:56:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1"},"description":"Earlier this year this blog reported on different attitudes to nanotech around the world. At the time the guy who did the study - Dietram A. Scheufele at","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/2008\/12\/god-damned-nanotechnology.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"God-damned nanotechnology"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/","name":"Epiphenom","description":"The science of religion and non-belief","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/98b4bf21daa886d9eb1d5f0e99643ad1","name":"Epiphenom","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/a9abb71dca9f11ec59b77b1fffa487fa?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Epiphenom"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/author\/trees"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2091"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/487\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/epiphenom\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}