{"id":5354,"date":"2013-11-16T13:17:25","date_gmt":"2013-11-16T17:17:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/?p=5354"},"modified":"2013-11-16T13:17:25","modified_gmt":"2013-11-16T17:17:25","slug":"djg-edition-comparison-historical-jesus-quest-of-1st-ed-vs-quest-of-the-historical-jesus-2nd-ed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2013\/11\/djg-edition-comparison-historical-jesus-quest-of-1st-ed-vs-quest-of-the-historical-jesus-2nd-ed\/","title":{"rendered":"DJG Edition Comparison: “Historical Jesus, Quest of” (1st Ed) -vs- “Quest of the Historical Jesus” (2nd Ed)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"\"<\/a>When I sketched the original post<\/a><\/strong> announcing the release of the 2nd edition of the Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels<\/em><\/strong><\/a>, I thought I would begin the comparison with Matthew. However, I found my interest drew me first to the article on the \u201cQuest of the Historical Jesus\u201d. I\u2019ve used the article to good effect in my own study as well as in classes. So it is one I knew fairly well. This article is an interesting case study in the difference between the two editions because it was authored by the same person, Collin Brown. \u00a0As some readers may have noticed in the comment from Richard Bauckham to the previous post<\/a><\/strong> on the DJG, Richard noted that while he was an original contributor, he was not asked to write the article for the same topic in the 2nd edition (\u201cGospels [Apocryphal]\u201d in the 1st ed, \u201cChristology\u201d in the 2nd).<\/p>\n

I still intend to write a post on the \u201cMatthew\u201d article as it will illustrate, on the other hand, the difference between the two editions by looking at an article written by different scholars in the 1st and 2nd editions.<\/p>\n

Historical Jesus, Quest of -vs- Quest of the Historical Jesus<\/em><\/p>\n

I begin with some data:<\/p>\n

1. Title<\/p>\n