\u201cI\u2019ve read Church in the Present Tense. And I liked it. But the title is wrong. It should be called Tense in the Present Church.\u201d \u2013 the inimitable Kim Fabricius<\/a><\/p>\nThe book delivers, however, on what it promises in the subtitle: \u201ca candid look at what\u2019s emerging\u201d. This represents both the strengths and weaknesses of the book, too: we have a glimpse of a conversation still in progress, yet the quality of the contributions varies at points, and there is very little resolution.<\/p>\n
Perhaps such weaknesses and limitations are inherent in this kind of multi-author work; in any case the book would have been strengthened by either of two features. Firstly, some kind of preface (am I the only person that still reads these?) proposing a\u00a0raison d\u2019etre<\/em> for the book: how did it come about and what does it hope to achieve? Secondly, an opportunity for the authors to respond to each other, addressing some of the frequent divergences or even outright contradictions.<\/p>\nEach of the four parts of the book \u2013 philosophy, theology, worship, and Bible and doctrine \u2013 is comprised by two chapters, and apart from the last which is penned solely by Scot McKnight, the two chapters are by different authors. And, while each of the parts certainly contains something worthwhile \u2013 sensible insights from Kevin Corcoran, subversive lyricism from Pete Rollins and solid but refreshing orthodoxy from McKnight \u2013 the chapters by Jason Clark contained (for me, at least) the stand-out contributions of the book. In the first (chapter 3) he provides a compelling account of the challenges that consumerism poses to Christian formation in community, in the second (chapter 5) he proposes a response. Perhaps this merely demonstrates my bias and an underdevelopment in my own discipleship: I feel competent (and I use that word consciously) in reading the Scriptures, in discussing philosophy and debating doctrine. I feel at a near total loss, however, in bringing these to bear on the most dominant aspect of the contemporary context \u2013 namely the fetishisation of production, consumption and distribution, or, more bluntly, the idolatry of the Market.<\/p>\n
Clark\u2019s critique of consumerism as a \u201cperverted\u201d counter-liturgy is challenging for its brilliance. He makes the familiar claim that the process of commodification has eroded identity, transforming it from something that is (at least, partly) received as gift, into something that is (almost entirely) produced or purchased, and so, may be exchanged or discarded arbitrarily. But, stingingly, this then is applied to the collective identity of the people of God, that is, ecclesiology. Most jarring to me, was his reflection that \u201cthose able to maintain their own faith [after having discarded \u2018church\u2019] can only do so because of years of past training they had in church communities,\u201d because it echoes but also takes issue with the claim of Jamieson (in\u00a0A Churchless Faith<\/em> and others) that outgrowing church is often given without irony as a legitimate reason for leaving it.<\/p>\nLeast satisfying was the book\u2019s opening chapter, in which Corcoran rejects the Emerging rejection of realism. It suffers from two significant faults: firstly, he provides no examples of emergent practitioners let alone theorists who sign up for the strong antirealism he dissembles; secondly, neither does he distinguish his \u2018chastened realism\u2019 from, for example, Wright\u2019s \u2018critical realism\u2019 or Vanhoozer\u2019s \u2018hermeneutic realism\u2019. In fact the determinative characteristic of chastened realism seems to be that, it isn\u2019t really realism after all. Yes, Corcoran says, things really exist; I concur, and believe that Burke and Rollins would, too. But, he concedes our knowledge of things is \u201cpartial<\/em>,\u00a0incomplete<\/em>, and\u00a0fragmentary<\/em>,\u201d\u00a0\u00a0(p11, italics original). Yet, still he dismisses as \u2018social-constructive anti-realism\u2019 the claim, which would seem to be inherent in the above quote, that we cannot \u201cknow [a thing] as it is, apart from us.\u201d\u00a0\u00a0So then, I was left wondering if there remained any distance on the anti-\/realist spectrum between soft (chastened) versions of Corcoran\u2019s realism and Rollins\u2019 anti-realism.<\/p>\nBetween these high and low points, the book offers entry into many other discussions \u2013 another take, this time from Rollins, on overcoming the gap between belief and behaviour, and McKnight out-gospelling The Gospel Coalition, for example. And as much fun as it would have been to comment on these and other chapters, one last observation is more necessary. It seems the book has made people tense because the authors are all white, male and even straight. Apart from observing that Australians and military chaplains were not represented (but now, thanks to this review, are) I note how heartened I am by Corcoran\u2019s response (here<\/a>). Yes, he concedes the point rightly made. More than that, I take his\u00a0mea culpa<\/em> as a concrete demonstration of intellectual discipleship that keeps the discussion moving so that it can remain open to other voices \u2013 even mine. Bravo.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev. Cameron West. \u201cI\u2019ve read Church in the Present Tense. And I liked it. But the title is wrong. It should be called Tense in the Present Church.\u201d \u2013 the inimitable Kim […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":196,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\n
Review - The Church in Present Tense<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Review - The Church in Present Tense\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Euangelion\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/michael.bird.33\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/coverart.oclc.org\/ImageWebSvc\/oclc\/+-+936279861_140.jpg?SearchOrder=+-+OT,OS,TN,FA,GO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Michael F. Bird\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@mbird12\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Michael F. Bird\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/\",\"name\":\"Review - The Church in Present Tense\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/db6f6af97b8c96ade6856573d1e67fb3\"},\"description\":\"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Review – The Church in Present Tense\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/\",\"name\":\"Euangelion\",\"description\":\"A Post-Post-Modern Blog On Scripture, Faith and Following Jesus\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/db6f6af97b8c96ade6856573d1e67fb3\",\"name\":\"Michael F. Bird\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33985cd4f41e365813d809405f3d6acf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33985cd4f41e365813d809405f3d6acf?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Michael F. Bird\"},\"description\":\"Mike Bird is Academic Dean and Lecturer in Theology at Ridley College in Melbourne, Australia.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/michael.bird.33\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/@mbird12\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC21I7qYVHPsOzL9ujxiRWZA\",\"brandygrenier\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/author\/mbird\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Review - The Church in Present Tense","description":"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Review - The Church in Present Tense","og_description":"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/","og_site_name":"Euangelion","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/michael.bird.33","article_published_time":"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/coverart.oclc.org\/ImageWebSvc\/oclc\/+-+936279861_140.jpg?SearchOrder=+-+OT,OS,TN,FA,GO"}],"author":"Michael F. Bird","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@mbird12","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Michael F. Bird","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/","name":"Review - The Church in Present Tense","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00","dateModified":"2011-08-10T23:41:07+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/db6f6af97b8c96ade6856573d1e67fb3"},"description":"The Church in the Present Tense By Kevin Corcoran,\u00a0Scot McKnight, Peter Rollins, & Jason Clark Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2011. Guest Post by Rev.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/2011\/08\/review-the-church-in-present-tense\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review – The Church in Present Tense"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/","name":"Euangelion","description":"A Post-Post-Modern Blog On Scripture, Faith and Following Jesus","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/db6f6af97b8c96ade6856573d1e67fb3","name":"Michael F. Bird","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33985cd4f41e365813d809405f3d6acf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/33985cd4f41e365813d809405f3d6acf?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Michael F. Bird"},"description":"Mike Bird is Academic Dean and Lecturer in Theology at Ridley College in Melbourne, Australia.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/michael.bird.33","https:\/\/twitter.com\/@mbird12","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UC21I7qYVHPsOzL9ujxiRWZA","brandygrenier"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/author\/mbird\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/196"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/euangelion\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/coverart.oclc.org\/ImageWebSvc\/oclc\/+-+936279861_140.jpg?SearchOrder=+-+OT,OS,TN,FA,GO\")
The Church in the Present Tense<\/em>