{"id":1037,"date":"2009-07-14T22:02:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-14T22:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037\/"},"modified":"2009-07-14T22:02:00","modified_gmt":"2009-07-14T22:02:00","slug":"1037","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html","title":{"rendered":""},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><strong>PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship.<\/strong> <a href=\"http:\/\/insidecatholic.com\/Joomla\/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=6334&amp;Itemid=48\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">My Inside Catholic piece<\/a> was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that advocacy.<\/p>\n<p>This is where my head is at right now, when I think about renewing the Christian tradition of vowed same-sex friendship. I\u2019m very open to criticism, especially critics who have alternative ideas for how to honor the loves I want to honor. But even if you\u2019re basically like, \u201cDon\u2019t go that way!\u201d rather than \u201cFollow me!\u201d, I want and need to hear from you. My email\u2019s on the sidebar.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe the first, necessary thing to say is that renewal is never rewind. There is simply no chance that vowed same-sex friendships in (say) 2055 will look the way they did in 1655. \u201cWith the inevitable forward march of progress\/comes new ways of hiding things\/and new things to hide.\u201d One thing I loved about Alan Bray\u2019s <em>The Friend<\/em> was its awareness of tensions, its ability to acknowledge conflicts without feeling the need to resolve them. This seems like a basic fact about any real, important tradition: It will serve both bad and good ends. You will not be able to harness it fully to any philosophy. It will always be messy and human and novelistic.<\/p>\n<p>And so I am not suggesting that a renewal of vowed same-sex friendship would \u201csolve our problems.\u201d Instead I\u2019m suggesting that it might shift our problems, so that we moved from less-Catholic problems to more-Catholic problems.<\/p>\n<p>Or to put it yet another way, even if I get everything I want from this idea, there will still be deep ethical problems with same-sex vowed friendships (just as there are deep ethical problems with Catholic marriage today, and there always have been). My goal is not to solve problems but to suggest that we might change them. If you think there are better ways to change our problems, email me!!! I promise to post <em>all <\/em>emails critical of this position.<\/p>\n<p><strong>PRENUPTIAL AGREEMENT<\/strong>: The one thing I most want to emphasize is that the Eucharist seals these vows. The Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ. These vows might have some kind of fifteenth-generation-xerox possibility in the absence of the Catholic faith, but they gain their depth and meaning and hope from Christ\u2019s Body.<\/p>\n<p>Having said that, I should note that my very last point is about generally Protestant communities and how they\u2019ve maintained a sense of the <em>family of baptism <\/em>which most American Catholics have simply discarded. The Eucharist is at the heart of everything I care about with these friendships, but I\u2019d be remiss if I didn\u2019t note that suffering and solidarity can create a kind of Protestant love-feast as well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>GIRLS DON\u2019T WANT BOYS, GIRLS WANT CARS AND MONEY<\/strong>: The tradition Alan Bray describes grew up in a culture where women were unequal, and where we were separated from men by a vast gulf of social status and poetic\/theological imagery. The tradition he describes was purely same-sex, and drew its power from metaphors both of marriage and of siblinghood, suggesting <em>chosen <\/em>kinship without sex. The tradition he describes defined the friend <em>against <\/em>the \u201csodomite,\u201d and had no place for what we now would call \u201cgay identity\u201d\u2013a lady could contract a sexually-transmitted disease from her ladyfriend and <em>perhaps <\/em>never consider herself implicated in the usual Romans condemnation-passage.<\/p>\n<p>We now live in a world where, as Bray himself describes, chosen kinship has been narrowed, filed down to marriage-and-nothing-else. Possibly this narrowing of kinship fuels the gay-marriage movement. (If you\u2019re a \u201cconservative Catholic\u201d and you\u2019ve warred against my \u201cRomoeroticism\u201d piece, maybe consider this?) We now live in a world of \u201csexual orientation,\u201d of \u201chomosexuality,\u201d of women working outside the home, and of women\u2019s theoretical equality.<\/p>\n<p>(Have women ever been \u201cequal\u201d in any interesting sense? I suppose it depends on what you consider interesting. Women have never been equivalent to men in any poetic sense. Women have never\u2013as far as I know\u2013been equal to men in any societal-power sense. If I were a man, I would ask God why I was not a woman, for precisely these reasons.)<\/p>\n<p>So: Can there be vowed same-sex friendship in a context so radically\u2013at least in theory!\u2013divorced from Bray\u2019s context?<\/p>\n<p>I think there are reasons to believe we can still renew this practice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>First, traditions adapt to fill new needs<\/strong>. We clearly have new needs. There are actual, existing same-sex couples in which one or both partner chooses to become chaste. Some of these couples are raising children. We need some way of honoring their love; otherwise we say, \u201cSplit up,\u201d and that is wrong.<\/p>\n<p>This is why I think vowed friendship, while I would recommend it to everyone!, will be most attractive to gay people. We are the ones who need it.<\/p>\n<p>I realize that if gay people take this on as a way of understanding our loves, it will be culturally harder for straight people to do the same. This is one of the new tensions and new problems I noted above. I\u2019m not sure how to address it. I want y\u2019all ladies to be able to make sisterhood vows without your husbands getting wiggy; and yet I want, also, for a gay man to be able to introduce his \u201cvowed friend\u201d to his family, and for them to understand that this means <em>more<\/em> than a boyfriend, and <em>different <\/em> than a friend.<\/p>\n<p>(Parenthetically, I\u2019ll say that I think there are strong reasons to follow tradition in restricting vowed friendships to same-sex pairs, even today when supposedly we\u2019re all equal. Men and women <em>aren\u2019t <\/em>similarly situated; tradition is a strong guide; regardless of sexual orientation, there\u2019s a point to distinguishing between relationships between two men, relationships between two women, and relationships between a man and a woman. I can expand on this if people want, since I know it\u2019s another point of tension! Mostly though, I\u2019m a \u201ctrad,\u201d I believe in sex differences [that would be how I come to like ladies, yo], and so I like structures which preserve the sense of difference.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Second, traditions exist to fill old needs<\/strong>, even when we\u2019ve forgotten how to address those needs. Veterans still have comrades. Straight men who need other men have virtually no way to articulate that need in terms our culture can understand. Vowed friendship between comrades would a) not preclude marriage and b) even more importantly, let the community\u2013not necessarily the law, I don\u2019t care about that right now\u2013acknowledge that these are men who have an unchosen but inescapable tie to one another.<\/p>\n<p>(For another point of tension: I know that now that we have ladies in the military, the relevant veteran-to-veteran links may cross the sex line. I genuinely don\u2019t know how to deal with that.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Third, traditions reflect minority practice, not just majority<\/strong>. I\u2019ve been struck, from the elementary-school playground to the pregnancy center, with how much more important godparenthood and godsiblinghood is to DC\u2019s black communities than to the white communities in which I was raised. We hear a lot about how black people are supposedly more \u201chomophobic\u201d than white, but we hear nothing about how much more open many black communities are to an expansive notion of kinship. I know this is a generosity born of necessity; but if all our communities worked the way black communities do, we\u2019d <em>already <\/em>have a better framework for understanding Alan Bray\u2019s description of premodern English kinship. \u201cGossip\u201d is short for \u201cgodsibling,\u201d yet the intimacy and responsibility of godsiblinghood is something I\u2019ve only found in DC\u2019s black communities.<\/p>\n<p>These ties are real and exist in America now. If you don\u2019t see them, it doesn\u2019t mean they\u2019ve gone away. Maybe they can be harnessed to handle all our needs.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that advocacy. This is where my head is at right now, when I think about renewing the Christian tradition of vowed same-sex friendship. I\u2019m very open to criticism, especially critics who have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1071,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Eve Tushnet<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Eve Tushnet\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Eve Tushnet\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Eve Tushnet\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html\",\"name\":\"\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/ca04686b93c92257f019070302a23415\"},\"description\":\"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/\",\"name\":\"Eve Tushnet\",\"description\":\"Conservatism reborn in twisted sisterhood\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/ca04686b93c92257f019070302a23415\",\"name\":\"Eve Tushnet\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be87ff28da150cb07788911c22e42ae2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be87ff28da150cb07788911c22e42ae2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Eve Tushnet\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/author\/evetushnet\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Eve Tushnet","description":"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_description":"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html","og_site_name":"Eve Tushnet","article_published_time":"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00","author":"Eve Tushnet","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Eve Tushnet","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html","name":"","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00","dateModified":"2009-07-14T22:02:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/ca04686b93c92257f019070302a23415"},"description":"PUBLIC LIVES IN PRIVATE PLACES: More thoughts on vowed friendship. My Inside Catholic piece was advocacy; this is the place where I complicate that","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/2009\/07\/1037.html"]}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/","name":"Eve Tushnet","description":"Conservatism reborn in twisted sisterhood","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/ca04686b93c92257f019070302a23415","name":"Eve Tushnet","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be87ff28da150cb07788911c22e42ae2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/be87ff28da150cb07788911c22e42ae2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Eve Tushnet"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/author\/evetushnet"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1037","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1071"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/evetushnet\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}