and Theology<\/em>, has determined that human reasoning skills continue to develop throughout adulthood, and that different people reach a higher final reasoning level than others. He has gone so far as to correlate this finding with the issue of religious belief.<\/p>\nReich\u2019s research shows that at the most basic reasoning level, people can only understand an either\/or dichotomy. If one given thing is true, then no other competing concept could possibly have validity. Reich compared this simple black versus white, either\/or mentality to the binary logic on which computers of the simplest form are based. Computers use a system of \u201c1\u2019s\u201d and \u201c0\u2019s\u201d to express any number, no matter how high. In binary logic, the system in question is either \u201con\u201d or \u201coff,\u201d \u201cyes\u201d or \u201cno.\u201d An \u201ceither\/or\u201d dichotomy is considered to sum up the entire situation. There are no other possibilities<\/p>\n
We all know people who approach religious belief this way. \u201cIf my religion is factually correct in every sense, then no other religion\u2014or any other viewpoint\u2014could possibly have any validity.\u201d This type of absolute certainty provides needed comfort and stability in the life of those who hold it. Such people often display a certain triumphalism<\/em> or sense of superiority over others because of their \u201ccorrect\u201d religious beliefs.<\/p>\nWhile apparently very useful in designing and running computers, binary logic is not an adequate way to determine life\u2019s most basic questions. You cannot use binary logic in choosing a spouse; you cannot use it to choose a career, or even which car to buy. Such matters always contain far more than two variables. For decisions with more than two variables, we need to employ some of Reich\u2019s \u201chigher\u201d levels of reasoning. Similarly, binary logic is not a valid form of reasoning when deciding such complex and entangled concepts as the nature of our being or the existence of God. Binary logic says \u201cIf God created the world in seven days, like it says in the Bible, then the theory of evolution cannot be true\u201d and \u201cIf my God is right, the God of all other religions must be wrong.\u201d But Reich\u2019s levels of reasoning tell us we must move beyond such simple logic in deciding questions like these.<\/p>\n
Our reasoning powers develop in accordance with our growth opportunities, and those whose reasoning is further developed can resolve cognitive conflict better than those whose reasoning is less mature. That means they can tolerate more uncertainty, do not need answers to be as black and white, as cut and dried; they do not see concepts as simply being either \u201ctrue\u201d or \u201cuntrue.\u201d Reich\u2019s research uncovered four reasoning levels above<\/em> simple binary logic. Each level describes a more complex and more advanced form of reasoning, an ever-broadening, more complete and more mature<\/em> perspective.<\/p>\nIn Reich\u2019s second level of reasoning, a person can allow that \u201cmaybe there is something valid\u201d to each of two competing viewpoints. Maybe this career would be more lucrative, but that other career might provide more personal satisfaction. In religion a person at Reich\u2019s second level may be able to admit that some other religions have good people too. He may be able to see that many religions are centered around similar values, even if the beliefs are different.<\/p>\n
At Reich\u2019s third level the person can concede that both viewpoints are needed to account for the phenomenon under study. In religion, a person may be able to see that some other creeds contain important concepts or ideas that are lacking in his own and may use the input of other faiths to complete his understanding.<\/p>\n
At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form\u00a0could be both a separate\u00a0entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.<\/p>\n
The highest level of reasoning, Reich\u2019s fifth level is apparently very rare. Here a person has the ability to recognize multiple, possibly competing perspectives as all having validity and all contributing to a complex, and constantly evolving whole. As it might apply to religion, this level probably represents something too complex to even describe, but it would definitely include allowing that all religions have some validity, that God\u2013whoever or whatever that is\u2014is much more vast than the human-like being described by most of our religions, and that our understanding of God must constantly evolve.<\/p>\n
So as you can see, a belief system providing definite black and white answers, as so many of our fundamentalist-type religions do, is based on a limited form of logic, and must necessarily fail to respect the full complexity of reality. To even begin to approach a full understanding, or to move toward a more complete and more mature form of spirituality, we must be willing to stretch beyond the limits of any given religion, and to include more varied contexts in our spiritual comprehension.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1150,"featured_media":285,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[32],"tags":[42,15,41,12,24,11],"class_list":["post-283","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spiritualmaturity","tag-binary-logic","tag-modern-society","tag-reasoning-power","tag-religious-belief","tag-spiritual-development","tag-spiritual-maturity"],"yoast_head":"\n
Religion vs Reasoning Skills<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Religion vs Reasoning Skills\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Faith Beyond Belief\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-12-04T22:41:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-12-04T04:32:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/258\/2012\/12\/my-laptop1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1944\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"2592\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Margaret Placentra Johnston\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Margaret Placentra Johnston\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/\",\"name\":\"Religion vs Reasoning Skills\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-12-04T22:41:48+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-12-04T04:32:47+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/3bff60a40168dbbc4995ec2571febe98\"},\"description\":\"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Religion vs Reasoning Skills\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/\",\"name\":\"Faith Beyond Belief\",\"description\":\"Spiritual Development for the Rational Seeker\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/3bff60a40168dbbc4995ec2571febe98\",\"name\":\"Margaret Placentra Johnston\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5fd8a07d289eff2df22399e653581306?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5fd8a07d289eff2df22399e653581306?s=96&d=mm&r=pg\",\"caption\":\"Margaret Placentra Johnston\"},\"description\":\"Author of Faith Beyond Belief: Stories of Good People Who Left Their Church Behind, Margaret Placentra Johnston writes in hope of challenging both religious believers and nonbelievers to consider a broader perspective. A practicing Optometrist, Margaret also loves helping people see better in the physical world. She lives in Virginia with her husband and has two grown sons.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/FaithBeyondBelief-book.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/author\/faithbeyondbelief\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Religion vs Reasoning Skills","description":"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Religion vs Reasoning Skills","og_description":"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/","og_site_name":"Faith Beyond Belief","article_published_time":"2012-12-04T22:41:48+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-12-04T04:32:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":"1944","height":"2592","url":"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/258\/2012\/12\/my-laptop1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Margaret Placentra Johnston","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Margaret Placentra Johnston","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/","name":"Religion vs Reasoning Skills","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-12-04T22:41:48+00:00","dateModified":"2012-12-04T04:32:47+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/3bff60a40168dbbc4995ec2571febe98"},"description":"At Reich\u2019s fourth level a person can explain how two competing concepts are related to each other. A person may be willing to allow that while science and logic are necessary, they may not supply all the answers, that there may be Truths in all religions, that all humans are all separate individuals and yet somehow all connected, that god in whatever form could be both a separate entity and yet still a part of every being at the same time.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/2012\/12\/religion-vs-reasoning-skills\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Religion vs Reasoning Skills"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/","name":"Faith Beyond Belief","description":"Spiritual Development for the Rational Seeker","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/3bff60a40168dbbc4995ec2571febe98","name":"Margaret Placentra Johnston","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5fd8a07d289eff2df22399e653581306?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5fd8a07d289eff2df22399e653581306?s=96&d=mm&r=pg","caption":"Margaret Placentra Johnston"},"description":"Author of Faith Beyond Belief: Stories of Good People Who Left Their Church Behind, Margaret Placentra Johnston writes in hope of challenging both religious believers and nonbelievers to consider a broader perspective. A practicing Optometrist, Margaret also loves helping people see better in the physical world. She lives in Virginia with her husband and has two grown sons.","sameAs":["http:\/\/FaithBeyondBelief-book.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/author\/faithbeyondbelief\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1150"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/283\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/285"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithbeyondbelief\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/258\/2012\/12\/my-laptop.jpg\" "\\"my")
<\/a>maturity? It turns out a Swiss researcher in cognitive and religious development has studied this in depth. K. Helmut Reich, holding doctoral degrees in Electrical Engineering, Physics, and Theology<\/em>, has determined that human reasoning skills continue to develop throughout adulthood, and that different people reach a higher final reasoning level than others. He has gone so far as to correlate this finding with the issue of religious belief.<\/p>\n