{"id":989,"date":"2010-07-22T12:45:34","date_gmt":"2010-07-22T18:45:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/community\/mainlineportal\/?p=989"},"modified":"2010-07-22T12:45:34","modified_gmt":"2010-07-22T18:45:34","slug":"responding-to-religious-terrorism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/","title":{"rendered":"Responding to Religious Terrorism"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><em>by Philip Clayton<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The \u201cOn Faith\u201d section of the <em>Washington Post<\/em> recently ran <a href=\"http:\/\/newsweek.washingtonpost.com\/onfaith\/2010\/07\/what_to_call_terrorists\/all.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\">a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate <em>Islamic<\/em> and <em>terrorist<\/em>. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are <em>political <\/em>acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For the record: I see no way of avoiding the adjective. When a suicide bomber carries the Qur\u2019an close to his heart as he dies or a gunman yells \u201cAll\u0101hu Akbar!\u201d (\u201cGod is Great!\u201d) as he kills other human beings, as Nidal Malik Hasan did last November, he leaves us no choice. <em>He<\/em> self-defines his terrorist act as a religious act. We may later try to wrest this definition away from him, and maybe with good reason. Yet we have no choice but to start with his dying words.<\/p>\n<p>But does the reader have to be an extremist too, dividing the world into either\/or\u2019s, siding with just one camp or the other? Is there no element of truth in the blogs of those I disagree with? Those on the other side of the debate scored at least three strong points. Let the record be expanded to include them as well:<\/p>\n<p>\u25cf The problem with the adjective \u201cIslamic\u201d terrorist is not that it\u2019s false. The problem lies in <em>us<\/em>, in what we do with it. The truth is, many Americans are using the phrase to <em>define<\/em> Islam, and then to dismiss it as evil. On Jesus-is-Lord.com, you can read about Muslims raping children and murdering innocents. What conclusions are drawn? \u201cThey are attempting to take over the entire world via violent conquest.\u201d \u201cWe see the incessant immigration of Muslim and Catholics. We\u2019re being overwhelmed.\u201d In response to the rape charges, a reader writes, \u201cI was brought up in a Muslim family, and I can tell you from experience that this is the way it is all of the time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u25cf Let\u2019s not underestimate our own ability to stereotype. Surely we have learned this much from our own sad history of racial relations in America. Abraham Heschel once wrote that \u201cRacism is man\u2019s gravest threat to man \u2014 the maximum of hatred for a minimum of reason.\u201d Obama\u2019s goal in separating adjective and noun is not to deny undeniable realities. It\u2019s to create a space, a cognitive gap, so that our minds don\u2019t leap blindly from \u201cMuslim\u201d to \u201cterrorist,\u201d as if the two terms were coterminous. <em>That<\/em> claim, surely, is false.<\/p>\n<p>\u25cf The world is far more complex, Horatio, than is dreamt of in your philosophy.<\/p>\n<p>Contraries are often true at the same time. Many Muslims are willing to condone, and some to engage in, acts of violence in the name of Islam. Too few Muslim spokespersons boldly condemn this link.\u00a0 That is true, and so is this: any deep study of Islamic texts, theology, and history shows the spiritual depth and wisdom contained in this tradition. I have the privilege of teaching great Muslim philosophers such as Avicenna and Averroes to graduate students, as well as the spiritual poetry of the Sufi mystics. This, too, is Islam.<\/p>\n<p>In short: we pay attention to labels not to promote an Orwellian distortion of reality, but to fight back against our own penchant to stereotype. Franklin Graham called Islam an \u201cevil and wicked religion,\u201d and conservative Christian leaders Pat Robertson and Chuck Colson happily echoed his refrain. Religious character assassination also needs to be resisted.<\/p>\n<p>Religions at their best offer a positive vision of how the world might be different. \u201cLet there be no compulsion in religion: Truth stands out clear from Error\u201d (Surah 2, Verse 256). Just as exterminating a species weakens the entire biosphere, so also silencing the positive voice of Islam removes a spiritual resource for the future of humanity. <em>Assalamu Alaikum<\/em> \u2014 Peace be upon you.<\/p>\n<p><em>Philip Clayton is <\/em><em>Professor of Religion and Philosophy at Claremont Graduate University and Ingraham Professor at\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.cst.edu\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\">Claremont School of Theology<\/a><\/em>.<em> He is primarily known for his work in constructive theology and the religion-science debate. <\/em><em>Visit his blog\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/philipclayton.net\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">here<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Washington Post&#8217;s &#8220;On Faith&#8221; recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d  I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d  Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism&#8230;   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Responding to Religious Terrorism<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Washington Post&#039;s &quot;On Faith&quot; recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Responding to Religious Terrorism\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Washington Post&#039;s &quot;On Faith&quot; recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Faith Forward\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Guest Contributor\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/\",\"name\":\"Responding to Religious Terrorism\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\"},\"description\":\"Washington Post's \\\"On Faith\\\" recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Responding to Religious Terrorism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/\",\"name\":\"Faith Forward\",\"description\":\"Voices from the Mainline, Progressive and Emerging Church\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2\",\"name\":\"Guest Contributor\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=identicon&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Guest Contributor\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/author\/admin\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Responding to Religious Terrorism","description":"Washington Post's \"On Faith\" recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Responding to Religious Terrorism","og_description":"Washington Post's \"On Faith\" recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/","og_site_name":"Faith Forward","article_published_time":"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00","author":"Guest Contributor","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Guest Contributor","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/","name":"Responding to Religious Terrorism","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00","dateModified":"2010-07-22T18:45:34+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2"},"description":"Washington Post's \"On Faith\" recently ran a fascinating debate on the question, \u201cWhat to call terrorists?\u201d I was most struck by how sharply the answers split. A number of the authorities objected stridently to the Obama administration\u2019s efforts to separate Islamic and terrorist. \u201cCall it what it is!\u201d they insisted; \u201cyou\u2019re just obscuring the facts and engaging in double-speak.\u201d But others were equally vehement on the other side: \u201cIt\u2019s not Islam as such that creates terrorism and terrorists. Theirs are political acts of violence, and we should label them as such. Don\u2019t blame this all on Islam!\u201d Guest blogger Philip Clayton invites us to watch our responses to religious terrorism...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/2010\/07\/responding-to-religious-terrorism\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Responding to Religious Terrorism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/","name":"Faith Forward","description":"Voices from the Mainline, Progressive and Emerging Church","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/2869b699bf0e57982cb1f212243705f2","name":"Guest Contributor","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5010a3cc274cdb37811bf24de46dc280?s=96&d=identicon&r=g","caption":"Guest Contributor"},"url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/989\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/faithforward\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}