![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2013\/10\/contact-foster-300x125.jpg\" "\\"contact-foster\\"")
<\/a>THE CRITICS are hailing Contact<\/i> as Hollywood\u2019s sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they\u2019re not far wrong. The film, adapted by Robert Zemeckis (Forrest Gump<\/i>) from the novel by Carl Sagan, is this year\u2019s most nakedly thought-provoking movie, and it does raise significant questions about the search for truth and the relationship between religion and science within that search.<\/p>\nThat relationship is personified in the on-and-off romance between Ellie Arroway (Jodie Foster), an astronomer who scans the skies for signs of extraterrestrial life, and Palmer Joss (Matthew McConaughey), a popular theologian and spiritual advisor to the American President.<\/p>\n
Palmer believes in God because of a supernatural experience he once had, but his testimony isn\u2019t enough to convince the skeptical Ellie. The tables turn, though, when Ellie receives a signal from a star 26 light-years away. The message contains instructions for building a transport which, after several twists and turns in the plot, Ellie rides into space.<\/p>\n
But after spending several hours with the aliens, she returns to find that no time at all has passed back on Earth. Her testimony is dismissed as a hoax, or a self-delusion. Like Lucy after her first adventures in Narnia, Ellie is dying to share her experience, but because she has no evidence to back up her story, no one will believe her. No one, that is, but Palmer, who recognizes in her an integrity similar to his own.<\/p>\n
So far, so open-minded. But whatever rapport this film builds between religion and science is hampered by the religious stereotypes sprinkled throughout Michael Goldenberg\u2019s script.<\/p>\n
There\u2019s Richard Rank (Rob Lowe), leader of the \u201cConservative Coalition,\u201d who frets that the aliens won\u2019t share Earth\u2019s \u201cvalues.\u201d There\u2019s David Drumlin (Tom Skerritt), the administrator who advances himself politically by currying favor with the gullible religious community. There\u2019s Joseph (Jake Busey), the sneering sideshow preacher who blows the first transport up, killing several people in a fit of apocalyptic self-righteousness.<\/p>\n
But, most tellingly, there is Palmer Joss himself. In the book, he was a \u201cfundamentalist preacher\u201d who tried \u201cto steer a middle course, to reconcile caricatures of science and religion.\u201d<\/p>\n
But the film goes out of its way to distance him from those wacky conservatives, transforming him into yet another caricature, albeit a sympathetic one. Now he\u2019s a seminary dropout who speaks pseudoliberal rhetoric, an ex-Jesuit who jumps at the chance to have casual sex with Ellie the day he meets her. Better to be a lapsed Catholic in Hollywood than an active evangelical.<\/p>\n
Whatever common ground may exist between religion and science, the film as a whole tips the scales decidedly in science\u2019s favor. The audience lives through Ellie\u2019s experience in space, but we only hear about Palmer\u2019s experience with God. And, at film\u2019s end, the audience is let in on a secret: the government has evidence that would prove Ellie\u2019s story, but they\u2019re keeping it hidden from the public.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s a far cry from Sagan\u2019s novel, which took a surprisingly theistic \u2014 or at least deistic \u2014 turn. There, the aliens helped Ellie find yet another message, this time buried deep within the very fabric of space and time by \u201can intelligence that antedates the universe.\u201d (Apparently Sagan couldn\u2019t bring himself to say \u201cGod\u201d.)<\/p>\n
In the film, the aliens settle for a trite, clich\u00e9d humanism instead. \u201cIn all the searching,\u201d says one, \u201cthe only thing we\u2019ve found that makes the emptiness bearable is each other.\u201d<\/p>\n
Perhaps that sentiment is meant to encourage dialogue here on earth, but true dialogue can\u2019t take place as long as entire communities \u2014 in this case, the religious one \u2014 are kept marginalized by Hollywood conventions. Listening to the stars may be a worthy venture, but it\u2019s of little use if you can\u2019t make contact with your fellow humans. <\/p>\n
\u2014 A version of this review was first published in <\/i>BC Christian News.<\/i><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood\u2019s sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they\u2019re not far wrong. The film, adapted by Robert Zemeckis (Forrest Gump) from the novel by Carl Sagan, is this year\u2019s most nakedly thought-provoking movie, and it does raise significant questions about the search for […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[107],"tags":[1496,219,1498,1604,1499,1495],"class_list":["post-10386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bcchristiannews","tag-carl-sagan","tag-contact","tag-jodie-foster","tag-matthew-mcconaughey","tag-michael-goldenberg","tag-robert-zemeckis"],"yoast_head":"\n
Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1997-07-27T15:00:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2013-11-02T21:03:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2013\/10\/contact-foster-300x125.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html\",\"name\":\"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1997-07-27T15:00:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2013-11-02T21:03:46+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)","description":"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)","og_description":"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"1997-07-27T15:00:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2013-11-02T21:03:46+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2013\/10\/contact-foster-300x125.jpg"}],"author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html","name":"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"1997-07-27T15:00:15+00:00","dateModified":"2013-11-02T21:03:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"THE CRITICS are hailing Contact as Hollywood's sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they're not far wrong. The film,","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/1997\/07\/review-contact-dir-robert-zemeckis-1997.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Review: Contact (dir. Robert Zemeckis, 1997)"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}![\"\"](\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2013\/10\/contact-foster.jpg\" "\\"contact-foster\\"")
<\/a>THE CRITICS are hailing Contact<\/i> as Hollywood\u2019s sole voice of reason in a summer filled with dumb, mass-marketed duds, and they\u2019re not far wrong. The film, adapted by Robert Zemeckis (Forrest Gump<\/i>) from the novel by Carl Sagan, is this year\u2019s most nakedly thought-provoking movie, and it does raise significant questions about the search for truth and the relationship between religion and science within that search.<\/p>\n