{"id":1237,"date":"2007-11-09T23:11:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-09T23:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up\/"},"modified":"2007-11-09T23:11:00","modified_gmt":"2007-11-09T23:11:00","slug":"lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html","title":{"rendered":"Lions for Lambs — the review’s up!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

\"\"<\/a>
My review<\/a> of Lions for Lambs<\/a><\/i> is now up at CT Movies.<\/span><\/p>\n

As an amateur number-cruncher, I can\u2019t resist noting a few extra things about this film \u2014 and specifically about its place in Tom Cruise\u2019s career.<\/p>\n

Going back to Mission: Impossible II<\/i> (2000), Cruise is arguably the only movie star to have appeared in seven consecutive films<\/a> that earned over $100 million in North America \u2014 eight, if we count his cameo in Austin Powers in Goldmember<\/a><\/i> (2002). I say \u201carguably\u201d because it all depends on whether you think Tom Hanks<\/a>\u2018s vocal performance in Toy Story 2<\/a><\/i> (1999) counts as an \u201cappearance\u201d; if it does, then Hanks has also had seven such films in a row, between Saving Private Ryan<\/a><\/i> (1998) and Catch Me If You Can<\/i> (2002).<\/p>\n

At any rate, Cruise\u2019s track record would be even better \u2014 averaging almost one such film per year as far back as A Few Good Men<\/i> (1992) \u2014 if it weren\u2019t for a couple of films he made in 1999, at a time when he apparently felt the need to prove his artistic cred, having long since proved himself as a box-office commodity. I refer, of course, to Stanley Kubrick\u2019s Eyes Wide Shut<\/a><\/i> and Paul Thomas Anderson\u2019s Magnolia<\/i>. For a brief, shining moment, Cruise put commercial viability aside in order to work with one of the industry\u2019s oldest and most reclusive living legends, and then to be part of the ensemble in a film by one of the industry\u2019s hottest up-and-coming indie filmmakers.<\/p>\n

So it is intriguing to see that Cruise, in choosing to make Lions for Lambs<\/i> his first starring vehicle since he took the reins at United Artists, has apparently opted for something resembling artistic cred again, rather than anything box-office related. The new film even has echoes of the two 1999 films. Like Eyes Wide Shut<\/i>, it is directed by an old Hollywood legend \u2014 in this case Robert Redford \u2014 and like Magnolia<\/i>, it is an ensemble film in which Cruise spends much of his screen time giving an interview to a somewhat antagonistic journalist.<\/p>\n

(In a weird way, the fact that Cruise shares top billing with two noticeably older and far more talented actors \u2014 namely Redford and Meryl Streep \u2014 also brings to mind that period in the late \u201980s and early \u201990s when Cruise made a point of co-starring with the likes of Paul Newman, Dustin Hoffman and Jack Nicholson.)<\/p>\n

But Lions for Lambs<\/i> is an extremely talky and didactic picture, so much so that it could almost have been a play, though not a very good one. And it\u2019s an explicitly political movie, released at a time when audiences don\u2019t seem to be remotely interested in explicitly political movies. With almost zero box-office potential, it\u2019s a really peculiar choice for a movie star who is trying to revitalize an old movie studio.<\/p>\n

At this point, I turn to Karina<\/a> at SpoutBlog, who has an interesting take on the significance of this film for Cruise\u2019s career:<\/p>\n

As political polemic and as entertainment, Robert Redford\u2019s Lions for Lambs<\/i> is mostly unsuccessful, but as a statement of purpose on behalf of its co-star and executive producer, Tom Cruise, it\u2019s mildly fascinating. Through sheer force of star power, Cruise manages to temporarily hijack this lumpy lecture, and turn it into a battle cry against the corporate media that both built and destroyed him. . . .<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I can\u2019t say Karina\u2019s point had occurred to me in so many words, but I did notice something along these lines while watching the film.<\/p>\n

In one of the film\u2019s final scenes, a guy watches the news, and the major military story of the day is relegated to a text crawl at the bottom of the screen while the program dwells on sleazy tabloid footage of a Britney-like pop star and the would-be rapper she\u2019s divorcing. I found myself wondering how that scene would have played if the footage were of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and whether making this film was basically Cruise\u2019s way of saying, \u201cHey, stop obsessing over my private life, and pay attention to something else<\/i> for a change!\u201d<\/p>\n

As it is, the experts are predicting<\/a> this film will make less than $7 million this weekend \u2014 easily the worst box-office performance of any Tom Cruise movie in its first weekend of wide release since The Color of Money<\/i> (1986; $6.4 million) or Legend<\/i> (1985; $4.3 million), with the exception of Magnolia<\/i>, which played on fewer screens than any Tom Cruise movie since All the Right Moves<\/i> (1983). And you just know that the media will pounce on figures like these to say that Cruise\u2019s career is falling even deeper into whatever hole he began digging when he jumped on Oprah\u2019s couch.<\/p>\n

But perhaps that\u2019s all part of Cruise\u2019s plan. Maybe he made this film just to show that he could<\/i> throw commercial viability to the winds again, and to lower everyone\u2019s expectations so that he can stage a big comeback with his next<\/i> film.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies. As an amateur number-cruncher, I can\u2019t resist noting a few extra things about this film \u2014 and specifically about its place in Tom Cruise\u2019s career. Going back to Mission: Impossible II (2000), Cruise is arguably the only movie star to have appeared in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1237","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nLions for Lambs -- the review's up!<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Lions for Lambs -- the review's up!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_MwnH1kpbPRM\/RzYFKq7iIMI\/AAAAAAAAA0g\/4UpaPQxpmh8\/s400\/lionsforlambs-a.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html\",\"name\":\"Lions for Lambs -- the review's up!\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Lions for Lambs — the review’s up!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Lions for Lambs -- the review's up!","description":"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Lions for Lambs -- the review's up!","og_description":"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/1.bp.blogspot.com\/_MwnH1kpbPRM\/RzYFKq7iIMI\/AAAAAAAAA0g\/4UpaPQxpmh8\/s400\/lionsforlambs-a.jpg"}],"author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html","name":"Lions for Lambs -- the review's up!","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00","dateModified":"2007-11-09T23:11:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"My review of Lions for Lambs is now up at CT Movies.As an amateur number-cruncher, I can't resist noting a few extra things about this film -- and","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/11\/lions-for-lambs-the-reviews-up.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Lions for Lambs — the review’s up!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1237"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1237\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1237"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1237"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1237"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}