{"id":2230,"date":"2006-05-29T11:07:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-29T11:07:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28\/"},"modified":"2006-05-29T11:07:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-29T11:07:00","slug":"canadian-box-office-stats-may-28","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html","title":{"rendered":"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; May 28"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><span style=\"font-family: georgia\">Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><i>Deep Sea 3-D<\/i> \u2014 CDN $1,138,590 \u2014 N.AM $9,353,786 \u2014 12.2%<br><i>The Da Vinci Code<\/i> \u2014 CDN $16,445,661 \u2014 N.AM $136,481,000 \u2014 12.0%<br><i>Mission: Impossible III<\/i> \u2014 CDN $12,323,982 \u2014 N.AM $113,967,000 \u2014 10.8%<br><i>Just My Luck<\/i> \u2014 CDN $1,443,533 \u2014 N.AM $13,457,000 \u2014 10.7%<\/span><br><span><i>RV<\/i> \u2014 CDN $5,204,496 \u2014 N.AM $55,955,000 \u2014 9.3%<\/span><br><span><i>Poseidon<\/i> \u2014 CDN $3,894,423 \u2014 N.AM $45,173,000 \u2014 8.6%<br><i>Over the Hedge<\/i> \u2014 CDN $6,254,386 \u2014 N.AM $75,931,000 \u2014 8.2%<br><i>The Sentinel<\/i> \u2014 CDN $2,802,796 \u2014 N.AM $34,614,186 \u2014 8.1%<br><i>X-Men: The Last Stand<\/i> \u2014 CDN $6,690,925 \u2014 N.AM $103,125,000 \u2014 6.5%<br><i>See No Evil<\/i> \u2014 CDN $377,407 \u2014 N.AM $8,563,000 \u2014 4.4%<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia\">A couple of discrepancies: <i>Deep Sea 3-D<\/i> and <i>The Sentinel<\/i> were #9 and #10 on the Canadian chart, respectively (they were not in the North American Top 20 at all this week, but they were at #21 and #22 last week), while <i>United 93<\/i> and <i>An American Haunting<\/i> were #9 and #10 on the North American chart, respectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Also, in case anyone was wondering, there was no stats post last week because the website from which I glean this information did not list the Canadian top ten.  Blame the Victoria Day holiday.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest. Deep Sea 3-D \u2014 CDN $1,138,590 \u2014 N.AM $9,353,786 \u2014 12.2%The Da Vinci Code \u2014 CDN $16,445,661 \u2014 N.AM $136,481,000 \u2014 12.0%Mission: Impossible III \u2014 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Canadian box-office stats -- May 28<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian box-office stats -- May 28\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html\",\"name\":\"Canadian box-office stats -- May 28\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; May 28\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian box-office stats -- May 28","description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian box-office stats -- May 28","og_description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00","author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html","name":"Canadian box-office stats -- May 28","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00","dateModified":"2006-05-29T11:07:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/05\/canadian-box-office-stats-may-28.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; May 28"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}