{"id":2606,"date":"2005-09-11T13:34:00","date_gmt":"2005-09-11T13:34:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million\/"},"modified":"2005-09-11T13:34:00","modified_gmt":"2005-09-11T13:34:00","slug":"the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html","title":{"rendered":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<\/head>

The Exorcism of Emily Rose<\/a><\/i> did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the third-highest September opening ever, and the 15th-highest of the year so far. Rory Bruer, president of distribution for Sony Pictures, tells the Associated Press<\/a>: \u201cThe movie cost us less than $20 million to make. We would have been very happy had the picture opened to $15 million.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

I am reminded of this bit from my interview with writer-director Scott Derrickson<\/a> last month:<\/p>\n

Marcus Nispel, who directed the Texas Chainsaw Massacre<\/i> remake, can make anything he wants now, because the movie was very \u2014 I loathed the film, but it was a very, very well-made, very well-crafted, very cinematically explosive movie made for very little money, and of course it made $75 million or whatever it was, so when Hollywood saw that, they saw him as a director who had tremendous skill. So he\u2019s off to bigger and better things.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Not to make Derrickson nervous or anything, but now that his film is giving the Chainsaw<\/i> movie (which opened<\/a> with $28.1 million on its way to a cume of $80.6 million) a run for its money, I\u2019m eager to see what sorts of \u201cbigger and better things\u201d lie in his future!<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the third-highest September opening ever, and the 15th-highest of the year so far. Rory Bruer, president of distribution for Sony Pictures, tells the Associated Press: \u201cThe movie cost us less than […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2606","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html\",\"name\":\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!","description":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!","og_description":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00","author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html","name":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00","dateModified":"2005-09-11T13:34:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose did way better than anyone expected this past weekend, grossing $30.2 million according to studio estimates. That makes it the","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/09\/the-exorcism-of-emily-rose-30-2-million.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Exorcism of Emily Rose: $30.2 million!"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books & Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2606","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2606"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2606\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2606"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2606"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2606"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}