{"id":26498,"date":"2015-01-15T13:39:04","date_gmt":"2015-01-15T21:39:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?p=26498"},"modified":"2015-01-16T08:18:18","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T16:18:18","slug":"oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html","title":{"rendered":"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2015\/01\/americansniper.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2015\/01\/americansniper-300x169.jpg\" alt=\"americansniper\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-26499\"><\/a>I devoted posts to this subject in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/03\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2005<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/02\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-redux.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2006<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2008\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-re-redux.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2007<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2009\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2008.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2008<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2010\/03\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2009.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2009<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2013\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2012.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2012<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2014\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2013.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">2013<\/a> \u2014 so here\u2019s the post for 2014.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.boxofficemojo.com\/oscar\/chart\/?yr=2005&amp;view=fulldetail&amp;catid=1&amp;p=.htm\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">2005<\/a> marked the first time since 1996 that the Best Picture winner did not gross at least $100 million, the first time since 1985 that not one of the Best Picture <i>nominees<\/i> grossed at least $100 million, and the first time in living memory that the Oscar did not go to one of the Top 25 films in North America. In fact, the winner that year \u2014 <i><a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2006\/03\/newsbites-cars-crash-bashing-id-trial-movie.html#2\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">Crash<\/a><\/i> \u2014 grossed a mere $54.6 million and ranked way, way down at #49.<\/p>\n<p>Ever since then, the Oscar for Best Picture has alternated between relatively big hits and somewhat smaller box-office performers. But that trend could end this year, as the Academy now seems poised to reward <i>two<\/i> small films in a row.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->Last year, the Oscar went to <i>12 Years a Slave<\/i>, which grossed $56.7 million and ranked 62nd among the films of 2013. If the pattern of the past decade holds, then this year\u2019s winner would have to be a much bigger hit than that \u2014 but not one of this year\u2019s nominees has earned $60 million or cracked the Top 50 for 2014!<\/p>\n<p>Admittedly, that will probably change very soon. <i>American Sniper<\/i>, which is currently playing in only four theatres, goes into wide release this weekend, and box-office analysts expect it to gross <a href=\"http:\/\/deadline.com\/2015\/01\/weekend-box-office-american-sniper-kevin-hart-the-wedding-ringer-paddington-blackhat-martin-luther-king-jr-1201349929\/\" target=\"_blank\" class=\" decorated-link\" rel=\"nofollow\">over $50 million<\/a> this weekend alone. If it follows the trajectory of last year\u2019s <i>Lone Survivor<\/i> \u2014 another military movie that went wide in mid-January \u2014 then it could very easily end up in the Top 25 for the year.<\/p>\n<p>But that doesn\u2019t mean <i>American Sniper<\/i> will win Best Picture. Crucially, the film\u2019s director, Clint Eastwood, failed to get an Oscar nomination, despite being nominated for best director on four previous occasions and winning twice, and despite being nominated for the Directors Guild Award for this particular film.<\/p>\n<p>So, odds are good that <i>American Sniper<\/i> won\u2019t win Best Picture. And thus, odds are good that this may mark the first time in living memory that the Oscar for Best Picture has gone to relatively low-grossing films for two consecutive years.<\/p>\n<p>As ever, we shall see. For now, here are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-nominations-my-own-two-bits-and-a-complete-list-2.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">the nominees<\/a>, with their current grosses and box-office rankings for the year as of yesterday:<\/p>\n<ul type=\"disc\">\n<li><i>The Grand Budapest Hotel<\/i> \u2014 $59,100,318 \u2014 53rd\n<\/li><li><i>The Imitation Game<\/i> \u2014 $42,776,746 \u2014 75th\n<\/li><li><i>Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)<\/i> \u2014 $26,601,455 \u2014 94th\n<\/li><li><i>The Theory of Everything<\/i> \u2014 $26,202,405 \u2014 96th\n<\/li><li><i>Boyhood<\/i> \u2014 $24,339,423 \u2014 100th\n<\/li><li><i>Selma<\/i> \u2014 $16,548,467 \u2014 112th\n<\/li><li><i>Whiplash<\/i> \u2014 $6,154,000 \u2014 138th\n<\/li><li><i>American Sniper<\/i> \u2014 $3,372,722 \u2014 157th<\/li><\/ul>\n<p>As before, here are the Best Picture winners (with box-office stats) going back to the year of my birth; I\u2019ll add this year\u2019s winner after it is announced February 22:<\/p>\n<p>2013 \u2014 62 \u2014 $56.7 million \u2014 <i>12 Years a Slave<\/i><br>\n2012 \u2014 22 \u2014 $136.0 million \u2014 <i>Argo<\/i><br>\n2011 \u2014 71 \u2014 $44.7 million \u2014 <i>The Artist<\/i><br>\n2010 \u2014 18 \u2014 $135.5 million \u2014 <i>The King\u2019s Speech<\/i><br>\n2009 \u2014 116 \u2014 $17.0 million \u2014 <i>The Hurt Locker<\/i><br>\n2008 \u2014 16 \u2014 $141.3 million \u2014 <i>Slumdog Millionaire<\/i><br>\n2007 \u2014 36 \u2014 $74.3 million \u2014 <i>No Country for Old Men<\/i><br>\n2006 \u2014 15 \u2014 $132.4 million \u2014 <i>The Departed<\/i><br>\n2005 \u2014 49 \u2014 $54.6 million \u2014 <i>Crash<\/i><br>\n2004 \u2014 24 \u2014 $100.5 million \u2014 <i>Million Dollar Baby<\/i><br>\n2003 \u2014 1 \u2014 $377.0 million \u2014 <i>The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King<\/i><br>\n2002 \u2014 10 \u2014 $170.7 million \u2014 <i>Chicago<\/i><br>\n2001 \u2014 11 \u2014 $170.7 million \u2014 <i>A Beautiful Mind<\/i><br>\n2000 \u2014 4 \u2014 $187.7 million \u2014 <i>Gladiator<\/i><br>\n1999 \u2014 13 \u2014 $130.1 million \u2014 <i>American Beauty<\/i><br>\n1998 \u2014 18 \u2014 $100.3 million \u2014 <i>Shakespeare in Love<\/i><br>\n1997 \u2014 1 \u2014 $600.8 million \u2014 <i>Titanic<\/i><br>\n1996 \u2014 19 \u2014 $78.7 million \u2014 <i>The English Patient<\/i><br>\n1995 \u2014 18 \u2014 $75.6 million \u2014 <i>Braveheart<\/i><br>\n1994 \u2014 1 \u2014 $329.7 million \u2014 <i>Forrest Gump<\/i><br>\n1993 \u2014 9 \u2014 $96.1 million \u2014 <i>Schindler\u2019s List<\/i><br>\n1992 \u2014 11 \u2014 $101.2 million \u2014 <i>Unforgiven<\/i><br>\n1991 \u2014 4 \u2014 $130.7 million \u2014 <i>Silence of the Lambs<\/i><br>\n1990 \u2014 3 \u2014 $184.2 million \u2014 <i>Dances with Wolves<\/i><br>\n1989 \u2014 8 \u2014 $106.6 million \u2014 <i>Driving Miss Daisy<\/i><br>\n1988 \u2014 1 \u2014 $172.8 million \u2014 <i>Rain Man<\/i><br>\n1987 \u2014 25 \u2014 $44.0 million \u2014 <i>The Last Emperor<\/i><br>\n1986 \u2014 3 \u2014 $138.5 million \u2014 <i>Platoon<\/i><br>\n1985 \u2014 5 \u2014 $87.1 million \u2014 <i>Out of Africa<\/i><br>\n1984 \u2014 12 \u2014 $52.0 million \u2014 <i>Amadeus<\/i><br>\n1983 \u2014 2 \u2014 $108.4 million \u2014 <i>Terms of Endearment<\/i><br>\n1982 \u2014 12 \u2014 $52.8 million \u2014 <i>Gandhi<\/i><br>\n1981 \u2014 7 \u2014 $59.0 million \u2014 <i>Chariots of Fire<\/i><br>\n1980 \u2014 11 \u2014 $54.8 million \u2014 <i>Ordinary People<\/i><br>\n1979 \u2014 xx \u2014 $106.3 million \u2014 <i>Kramer Vs. Kramer<\/i><br>\n1978 \u2014 xx \u2014 $49.0 million \u2014 <i>The Deer Hunter<\/i><br>\n1977 \u2014 xx \u2014 $38.3 million \u2014 <i>Annie Hall<\/i><br>\n1976 \u2014 xx \u2014 $117.2 million \u2014 <i>Rocky<\/i><br>\n1975 \u2014 xx \u2014 $109.0 million \u2014 <i>One Flew over the Cuckoo\u2019s Nest<\/i><br>\n1974 \u2014 xx \u2014 $47.5 million \u2014 <i>The Godfather Part II<\/i><br>\n1973 \u2014 xx \u2014 $156.0 million \u2014 <i>The Sting<\/i><br>\n1972 \u2014 xx \u2014 $133.7 million \u2014 <i>The Godfather<\/i><br>\n1971 \u2014 xx \u2014 $51.7 million \u2014 <i>The French Connection<\/i><br>\n1970 \u2014 xx \u2014 $61.7 million \u2014 <i>Patton<\/i><\/p>\n<p><b>March 2 update:<\/b> Updated to include the winner for 2013.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For the first time in decades &#8212; and possibly ever &#8212; the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[2742,19,179,347],"class_list":["post-26498","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","tag-american-sniper","tag-box-office","tag-clint-eastwood","tag-oscars"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-01-15T21:39:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-16T16:18:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2015\/01\/americansniper-300x169.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html\",\"name\":\"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2015-01-15T21:39:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-16T16:18:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014","description":"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014","og_description":"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2015-01-15T21:39:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-16T16:18:18+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.production.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2015\/01\/americansniper-300x169.jpg"}],"author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html","name":"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2015-01-15T21:39:04+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-16T16:18:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"For the first time in decades -- and possibly ever -- the Academy may be on the verge of giving its top prize to films that relatively few people have seen for two years in a row.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2015\/01\/oscar-winners-slipping-at-the-box-office-2014.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Oscar winners slipping at the box office \u2014 2014"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26498","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26498"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26498\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26498"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26498"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26498"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}