{"id":2762,"date":"2005-06-13T11:04:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-13T11:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12\/"},"modified":"2005-06-13T11:04:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-13T11:04:00","slug":"canadian-box-office-stats-june-12","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html","title":{"rendered":"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; June 12"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><span style=\"font-family: georgia\">Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span><i>C.R.A.Z.Y.<\/i> \u2014 CDN $771,020 \u2014 N.AM $771,020 \u2014 100%<\/span><br><span><i>Lords of Dogtown<\/i> \u2014 CDN $862,322 \u2014 N.AM $9,336,000 \u2014 9.2%<br><i>The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants<\/i> \u2014 CDN $2,124,650 \u2014 N.AM $23,691,000 \u2014 9.0%<\/span><br><span><i>Star Wars: Episode III: Revenge of the Sith<\/i> \u2014 CDN $28,503,437 \u2014 N.AM $332,108,000 \u2014 8.6%<br><i>Madagascar<\/i> \u2014 CDN $10,635,193 \u2014 N.AM $128,334,000 \u2014 8.3%<br><i>Monster-in-Law<\/i> \u2014 CDN $6,285,941 \u2014 N.AM $76,475,000 \u2014 8.2%<br><i>Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith<\/i> \u2014 CDN $3,866,343 \u2014 N.AM $51,050,000 \u2014 7.6%<br><i>Cinderella Man<\/i> \u2014 CDN $2,561,227 \u2014 N.AM $34,459,000 \u2014 7.4%<br><i>The Longest Yard<\/i> \u2014 CDN $7,826,538 \u2014 N.AM $118,106,000 \u2014 6.6%<br><i>The Adventures of Shark Boy &amp; Lava Girl in 3D<\/i> \u2014 CDN $448,045 \u2014 N.AM $12,505,000 \u2014 3.6%<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: georgia\">A couple of discrepancies: <i>Lords of Dogtown<\/i> and <i>C.R.A.Z.Y.<\/i> were #8 and #10 on the Canadian chart, respectively (the former film was #12 on the North American chart, and the latter film isn\u2019t listed at all), while <i>The Honeymooners<\/i> and <i>High Tension<\/i> were #8 and #10 on the North American chart, respectively.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe the lowest. C.R.A.Z.Y. \u2014 CDN $771,020 \u2014 N.AM $771,020 \u2014 100%Lords of Dogtown \u2014 CDN $862,322 \u2014 N.AM $9,336,000 \u2014 9.2%The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants \u2014 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Canadian box-office stats -- June 12<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Canadian box-office stats -- June 12\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html\",\"name\":\"Canadian box-office stats -- June 12\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; June 12\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Canadian box-office stats -- June 12","description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Canadian box-office stats -- June 12","og_description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00","author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html","name":"Canadian box-office stats -- June 12","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00","dateModified":"2005-06-13T11:04:00+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"Here are the figures for the past weekend, arranged from those that owe the highest percentage of their take to the Canadian box office to those that owe","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2005\/06\/canadian-box-office-stats-june-12.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Canadian box-office stats &#8212; June 12"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}