Jeff Overstreet<\/a> has just linked to this article<\/a> by Ken Morefield on the possibility that the Left Behind<\/a><\/i> series of books might constitute a form of \u201cevangelical pornography\u201d.<\/span><\/p>\n As Morefield writes, \u201cI would argue that the success of these books is largely because they serve a Kaplanesque pornographic function \u2014 they allow readers to simultaneously gratify and hide a desire.\u201d He adds, \u201cI would argue, however, prior to the ascent of Ralph Reed\u2019s Christian Coalition in the 1980s and 1990s, the dominant mood of the Christian community was one of dismay at the loss of perceived privileged status as the dominant worldview of the country. For that reason, I think it is easy to see the portrayal of Christian persecution [in] the post-apocalyptic world as being allegorical rather than prophetic.\u201d He concludes:<\/p>\n In Left Behind<\/i>, as in much Christian fiction, the objects that are portrayed seem to be represented in such a way as to gratify the consumers rather than challenge them. The role of the constructed reader flip-flops seamlessly, as it does in much pornography, between that of the victim wronged by the object of pornography and the victorious and vengeful corrector of past injustices. Pornography often reveals a deep-seated anger or hostility in the heart of the consumer which, combined with his feelings of powerlessness, creates a need to manipulate, punish, and humiliate the perceived sources of that treatment.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Quite so. As I wrote in my own article<\/a> on end-times fiction for the Vancouver Sun<\/i> a few years ago:<\/p>\n Most evangelicals [in the 19th century] were postmillennialists, and it was this belief that fuelled their efforts on behalf of the abolition of slavery, the rights of women, and so on. But by the early 20th century, they were growing discouraged, as missionaries met with resistance overseas and churches back home turned to more liberal interpretations of the Bible. The Christianization of the world seemed increasingly unlikely, and in the 1920s, fundamentalists were pushed even further to the margins of society, following the public-relations disasters of Prohibition and the Scopes trial. The idea that God would remove all the true believers and then exact his judgment on the rest of the world appealed to an increasingly marginalized community.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Or, as Michael Joseph Gross put it in the Atlantic Monthly<\/i> five years ago<\/a>:<\/p>\n \u201cLeft Behind\u201d offers no strong alternative to the world\u2019s definition of what matters; it merely appropriates and baptizes worldly standards. Everyone in the books is above average. The characters\u2019 brains and physical beauty are sometimes described with clumsy cultural references that demonstrate little more than Jenkins\u2019s aching, futile desire to be \u201cwith it\u201d: one character looks \u201cas if he had come off the cover of a Fortune 500 edition of GQ.\u201d Buck is \u201cIvy League\u201d educated; Rayford, despite his simplistic conversation, is described as an \u201cerudite reader.\u201d The Tribulation Force drives a snazzy Range Rover loaded with gizmos (cell phone, \u201ccitizen\u2019s band radio,\u201d and \u201ca CD player that plays those new two-inch jobs\u201d). Everyone is online, and the Tribulation Force proselytizes on two separate Web sites. One, maintained by a messianic Jew named Tsion Ben-Judah, is strictly theological (\u201cten times more popular than any other [site] in history\u201d); the other, maintained by Buck, is an underground newsmagazine called The Truth (\u201cten times the largest reading audience he had \u2026 [at] Global Community Weekly\u201d). And the leading believers get treated like stars. A young Jewish convert (David Hassid) is amazed that Rayford knows Tsion Ben-Judah personally. \u201cShoot,\u201d Rayford says, \u201cI can probably get the kid an autograph.\u201d . . .<\/p>\n Why would Jerry B. Jenkins want to be famous? In The Frenzy of Renown: Fame & Its History<\/i>, Leo Braudy points out that Emperor Augustus made the Roman state \u201cthe only place where personal dignity could be conferred.\u201d Then Christianity came along \u201cto define an arena for individual nature well beyond the political,\u201d and \u201cdignity was conferred not in the service of Rome, but in the service of God.\u201d (Render unto Caesar, and so forth.) The empire socialized the desire for personal recognition; the Church spiritualized it. Still, the Church and the Empire each also retained some vestige of the other\u2019s power. The Catholic ecclesiastical structure can still slake the human thirst for worldly recognition within a community of the faithful; for Catholics, salvation has always had to do with actual physical interaction among believers. Protestants, in contrast, have only their Bibles to keep them warm. Their church hierarchies are more various (in many evangelical and fundamentalist churches they are almost chaotic), and their salvation depends more heavily on an abstract relationship with the Truth, revealed through Scripture. These facts can\u2019t help creating a conflicted relationship between Protestants and the culture at large \u2014 a heightened sensitivity to culture\u2019s world-shaping power and a fear of words and images that do not point back to the Word.<\/p>\n This fear is what makes Jenkins desire fame. His books suggest that he fears being left behind by a secular, global, technological culture bereft of Christian messages, and the popularity of his books confirms that he\u2019s not alone in his fear. Jenkins fights fear with fiction, by Christianizing the world. But the \u201cLeft Behind\u201d phenomenon has been swept up in worldly culture, even enraptured by it. (\u201cOur most important goal is to produce a movie that is accessible and understood by the average moviegoer.\u201d) This must be a terrifying experience, because now the fear doubles: Jenkins is a Christian at war with secular culture, but his toy soldiers use a $100,000 Range Rover as their tank. No wonder Rayford Steele is the Antichrist\u2019s personal pilot.<\/p>\n Jenkins and LaHaye have done a masterly job of using conservative Christian media networks to purvey their message, build their image, and make their fortune. But the great throng of their fans, and even the authors themselves, are painfully aware that they are out of the loop. The harder they try to be culturally relevant, the more ridiculous they become, the further they fall from relevance, the more intensely they are exiled \u2014 not only from cultural legitimacy but also from the spiritual power of their own beliefs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n FWIW, it may also be possible to look at the Left Behind<\/i> series as a simple revenge fantasy. John Shelton Lawrence and Robert Jewett explore this angle when they include the film in their chapter on disaster movies in The Myth of the American Superhero<\/a><\/i>; there, they coin the term \u201cTertullian ecstasy\u201d to describe the almost sensual pleasure that Christians such as Tertullian and Jonathan Edwards have expressed at the thought of seeing the wicked unbelievers punished \u2014 ideally in this life, but certainly in hell. (And the Left Behind<\/i> series is, basically, all about how this world goes to hell, once all the Christians have been removed.)<\/p>\n Footnote: Morefield goes a little easy on the books\u2019 treatment of Catholicism<\/a>; he does not mention that the raptured Pope had apparently Lutheran tendencies and was thus okay in the eyes of Tim LaHaye and his readers. So, what seems like an ecumenical concession on the books\u2019 part, isn\u2019t, exactly.<\/p>\n