{"id":3436,"date":"2012-07-27T15:24:28","date_gmt":"2012-07-27T21:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?p=3436"},"modified":"2012-07-27T19:27:01","modified_gmt":"2012-07-28T01:27:01","slug":"oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html","title":{"rendered":"Oh what a tangled web the <i>Bourne<\/i> writers weave&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\">\n<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><meta http-equiv=\"content-type\" content=\"text\/html; charset=utf-8\"><\/head><body><p><a href=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2012\/07\/bournelegacy.jpg\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/wp-media.patheos.com\/blogs\/sites\/227\/2012\/07\/bournelegacy-300x171.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"bournelegacy\" width=\"300\" height=\"171\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-3437\"><\/a>The constant retconning on the <i>Bourne<\/i> movies is really something to behold. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2004\/07\/review-the-bourne-supremacy-dir-paul-greengrass-2004.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">first sequel<\/a> didn\u2019t do anything too outrageous \u2014 it just added some flashbacks to an earlier point in \u201cJason Bourne\u2019s\u201d career \u2014 but it ended with an epilogue in which Bourne, an amnesiac, learns his real name. So the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2007\/08\/review-the-bourne-ultimatum-dir-paul-greengrass-2007.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\">second sequel<\/a> had to get a wee bit more inventive, if it was to keep this amnesiac-on-the-run storyline going; instead of picking up where the first sequel left off, the bulk of the second sequel actually takes place <i>before<\/i> the epilogue to the first sequel. And then, by the end of that second sequel, Bourne\u2019s real name had been shared not only with Bourne himself but with the world at large. The amnesiac-on-the-run premise had been exhausted. The franchise simply had <a href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2008\/02\/can-matt-damon-really-be-bourne-again.html\" class=\" decorated-link\" target=\"_blank\"> nowhere to go<\/a> from there.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->But that hasn\u2019t stopped the filmmakers from coming up with a new angle, and revising everything we thought we knew yet again. \u201cJason Bourne\u201d himself is not a major figure in <i>The Bourne Legacy<\/i>, which comes out next week \u2014 but apparently his actions had a domino effect on a whole bunch of <i>other<\/i> characters who will now be introduced to us for the first time. And, just to make things even <i>more<\/i> convoluted, a just-released featurette explains that the new, fourth movie actually takes place <i>at the same time as<\/i> the third movie. Which presumably means that it, too, takes place at least partly before the end of the second movie. Whew.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/pMQkiwZVQaA\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, did you catch that bit about chromosomes? It sounds like they\u2019re taking this franchise in an increasingly sci-fi-ish direction. So are we going to find out that \u201cJason Bourne\u201d and the other assassins were not merely highly trained at what they did, but genetically engineered as well? This is beginning to remind me of how George Lucas introduced \u201cmidichlorians\u201d to the <i>Star Wars<\/i> prequels.<\/p>\n<\/body><\/html>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn\u2019t do anything too outrageous \u2014 it just added some flashbacks to an earlier point in \u201cJason Bourne\u2019s\u201d career \u2014 but it ended with an epilogue in which Bourne, an amnesiac, learns his real name. So the second sequel had [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[127,156,126,154,157],"class_list":["post-3436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog","tag-bourne-identity","tag-bourne-legacy","tag-bourne-supremacy","tag-bourne-ultimatum","tag-star-wars-episode-i-the-phantom-menace"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn&#039;t do anything too outrageous -- it just added some\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn&#039;t do anything too outrageous -- it just added some\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"FilmChat\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2012-07-27T21:24:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-07-28T01:27:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2012\/07\/bournelegacy-300x171.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Peter T. Chattaway\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html\",\"name\":\"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2012-07-27T21:24:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2012-07-28T01:27:01+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\"},\"description\":\"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn't do anything too outrageous -- it just added some\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave&#8230;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/\",\"name\":\"FilmChat\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde\",\"name\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Peter T. Chattaway\"},\"description\":\"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...","description":"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn't do anything too outrageous -- it just added some","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...","og_description":"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn't do anything too outrageous -- it just added some","og_url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html","og_site_name":"FilmChat","article_published_time":"2012-07-27T21:24:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-07-28T01:27:01+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/files\/2012\/07\/bournelegacy-300x171.jpg"}],"author":"Peter T. Chattaway","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Peter T. Chattaway","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html","name":"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave...","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website"},"datePublished":"2012-07-27T21:24:28+00:00","dateModified":"2012-07-28T01:27:01+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde"},"description":"The constant retconning on the Bourne movies is really something to behold. The first sequel didn't do anything too outrageous -- it just added some","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/2012\/07\/oh-what-a-tangled-web-the-bourne-writers-weave.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Oh what a tangled web the Bourne writers weave&#8230;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/","name":"FilmChat","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/5759ddf28b81af08b29eb15b4e071fde","name":"Peter T. Chattaway","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9c4b809df092b410d749a6995bcf4f3e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Peter T. Chattaway"},"description":"Peter T. Chattaway was the regular film critic for BC Christian News from 1992 to 2011. In addition to his award-winning film column for that paper, his news and opinion pieces have appeared in such publications as Books &amp; Culture, Christianity Today, Bible Review and the Vancouver Sun. He has also contributed essays to the books Re-Viewing The Passion: Mel Gibson\u2019s Film and Its Critics (Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Scandalizing Jesus?: Kazantzakis\u2019s The Last Temptation of Christ Fifty Years on (Continuum, 2005) and The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film (De Gruyter, 2016).","url":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/author\/peterchattaway"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.patheos.com\/blogs\/filmchat\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}